Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

GitBucket VS Gitolite

Compare GitBucket VS Gitolite and see what are their differences

GitBucket logo GitBucket

GitBucket is the easily installable open-source GitHub clone written with Scala.

Gitolite logo Gitolite

Setup git hosting on a central server, with fine-grained access control
  • GitBucket Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-21
  • Gitolite Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-16

GitBucket features and specs

  • Simple Setup
    GitBucket is relatively easy to set up and requires minimal configuration, making it accessible for users who may not be as technically inclined.
  • Integrated Wiki and Issues
    GitBucket provides integrated support for wikis and issue tracking, allowing teams to manage project documentation and track issues in one place.
  • Plugin System
    The platform supports a flexible plugin system, enabling users to extend the functionality of GitBucket to fit their specific needs.
  • Supports GitHub API
    GitBucket supports much of the GitHub API, which allows for better compatibility with tools and services that integrate with GitHub.
  • Low Resource Use
    GitBucket is known for its low resource consumption compared to some other Git hosting solutions, making it suitable for environments with limited resources.

Possible disadvantages of GitBucket

  • Limited Scalability
    GitBucket may not scale as well as other enterprise-level solutions, which could be a limitation for very large projects or organizations.
  • Interface
    The user interface of GitBucket may not be as polished or intuitive as other popular Git hosting platforms like GitHub or GitLab.
  • Community Size
    The community and development support for GitBucket are smaller compared to larger platforms, which might result in slower updates and fewer available extensions.
  • Dependency on JVM
    GitBucket runs on the Java Virtual Machine, which means it requires a JVM to be installed, potentially complicating deployment in certain environments.
  • Limited Advanced Features
    GitBucket may lack some advanced features found in more comprehensive solutions like GitLab or Bitbucket, such as advanced CI/CD pipelines or built-in container registries.

Gitolite features and specs

  • Access Control
    Gitolite provides fine-grained access control over Git repositories, allowing administrators to set permissions at the branch, tag, and repository level, which enhances security and management.
  • Lightweight and Simple
    As a server-side application, Gitolite is lightweight and does not require a complex setup or configuration, making it easier to install and maintain on existing Git servers.
  • Flexible Configuration
    Gitolite offers flexible configuration options through straightforward text files, allowing administrators to easily manage repositories and user permissions.
  • SSH-based Authentication
    Utilizing SSH keys for authentication, Gitolite enhances security and eliminates the need for separate password management for accessing the Git server.
  • Open Source
    Gitolite is an open-source tool, which means it is free to use and can be modified according to specific needs, contributing to community-driven development and improvement.

Possible disadvantages of Gitolite

  • Learning Curve
    Gitolite has a steeper learning curve for users who are not familiar with command-line operations and managing permissions via text file configurations.
  • Limited User Interface
    Gitolite lacks a graphical user interface, which can be a limitation for users who prefer or require a visual management tool for handling repositories and permissions.
  • Dependency on SSH
    Since Gitolite relies heavily on SSH for authentication and access, any issues or misconfigurations with SSH can lead to connectivity problems and access issues.
  • Feature Set Restrictions
    Gitolite might not provide all the features of more comprehensive Git server solutions, such as integrated code review, project management tools, or web-based interfaces.
  • Maintenance Overhead
    Administrators must manually handle updates and configurations, which might require additional effort compared to solutions that provide automatic updates and more streamlined management options.

Analysis of GitBucket

Overall verdict

  • Yes, GitHub is generally considered a very good platform for developers. Its comprehensive set of tools and features enhances productivity and collaboration among teams, making it a cornerstone for many software development projects.

Why this product is good

  • GitHub (often referred to by users as GitBucket, although GitBucket is technically a different service) is a widely used platform for version control and collaborative software development. It offers a robust set of features including issue tracking, code reviews, project management tools, and continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) capabilities. Its large community and ecosystem of integrations make it a go-to platform for many developers.

Recommended for

  • Software developers looking for a reliable version control system.
  • Teams seeking collaborative coding environments.
  • Open-source project maintainers and contributors.
  • Organizations that require extensive project management tools.
  • Developers who appreciate a wide range of third-party integrations.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GitBucket and Gitolite)
Git
76 76%
24% 24
Code Collaboration
72 72%
28% 28
Software Development
69 69%
31% 31
Version Control
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using GitBucket and Gitolite. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Gitolite might be a bit more popular than GitBucket. We know about 2 links to it since March 2021 and only 2 links to GitBucket. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

GitBucket mentions (2)

  • Selfhosted open source alternative to GitHub/GitLab
    I saw this on HN and have been using it for the past two weeks for some small hobby projects. The docs are so-so but I got it set up in Docker without much hassle. I've since migrated completely from gitbucket. Great software - I encourage everyone to try it out. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • Scala projects to read through
    A Git platform (like github or gitlab) written in Scala. Definitely not a pet project so might be fun to read the code. Https://github.com/gitbucket/gitbucket. Source: almost 4 years ago

Gitolite mentions (2)

  • Whatever happened to SHA-256 support in Git?
    People also forget about Gitolite, which provides lightweight shared access control around Git+SSH+server-repos. For me it's a much simpler alternative than systems with a heavyweight web UI. Although to be honest I don't know whether Gitolite handles SHA256 hashes (I've never tested it). https://gitolite.com. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
  • *set Edge as default browser*
    Gitolite is awesome if there's no need for web frontend and easy to setup. Source: about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GitBucket and Gitolite, you can also consider the following products

Gitea - A painless self-hosted Git service

GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab

Bonobo Git Server - Set up your own self hosted git server on IIS for Windows.

GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.

Gitstack - GitStack is a free software that let you setup your own private Git server on Windows.

Gogs - A painless self-hosted Git service written in Go