Software Alternatives & Reviews
Register   |   Login

Gitbox VS Atlassian Bitbucket Server

Compare Gitbox VS Atlassian Bitbucket Server and see what are their differences


“Version control outside the Terminal is usually a clusterfuck. Gitbox looks the most straightforward that I've seen thus far.” Mark Otto, UI designer at Twitter. “I've started really, really liking Git since getting Gitbox.

Atlassian Bitbucket Server is a scalable collaborative Git solution.
Gitbox Landing Page
Gitbox Landing Page
Atlassian Bitbucket Server Landing Page
Atlassian Bitbucket Server Landing Page

Gitbox details

Categories
Git Git Tools Code Collaboration
Website oleganza.com  

Atlassian Bitbucket Server details

Categories
Code Collaboration Git Documentation
Website atlassian.com  

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Gitbox and Atlassian Bitbucket Server)
10
10%
90%
90
5
5%
95%
95
100
100%
0%
0
0
0%
100%
100

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Gitbox and Atlassian Bitbucket Server, you can also consider the following products

SourceTree - Mac and Windows client for Mercurial and Git.

Visual Studio Team Services - Visual Studio Team Services (VSTS) provides unlimited Git hosting, cloud build for CI, agile planning and continuous delivery.

SmartGit - SmartGit is a front-end for the distributed version control system Git and runs on Windows, Mac OS...

GitHub Desktop - GitHub Desktop is a seamless way to contribute to projects on GitHub and GitHub Enterprise.

GitKraken - The intuitive, fast, and beautiful cross-platform Git client.

Mercurial SCM - Mercurial is a free, distributed source control management tool.

User reviews

Share your experience with using Gitbox and Atlassian Bitbucket Server. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Post a review