Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

GitBook VS Stonly

Compare GitBook VS Stonly and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

GitBook logo GitBook

Modern Publishing, Simply taking your books from ideas to finished, polished books.

Stonly logo Stonly

Create interactive step-by-step guides
  • GitBook Landing page
    Landing page //
    2024-05-27
  • Stonly Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-20

GitBook features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    GitBook offers a clean and intuitive user interface, making it easy for users to write, edit, and organize documentation without a steep learning curve.
  • Collaborative Tools
    GitBook provides robust collaboration features such as real-time editing, comments, and version control, allowing teams to work together efficiently.
  • Integration with Git
    GitBook integrates seamlessly with Git repositories, enabling users to sync their documentation with their codebase and manage it using Git workflows.
  • Customizable Templates
    The platform offers customizable themes and templates, enabling users to maintain a consistent look and feel for their documentation that aligns with their brand.
  • Web and Markdown Support
    GitBook allows the use of Markdown syntax and supports web-based editing, making it versatile for different types of content creators.
  • Hosting and Deployment
    GitBook hosts the documentation on their servers, providing a reliable and fast server infrastructure to publish and share content instantly.
  • Search and Navigation
    It includes powerful search and navigation features, helping readers to find information quickly and improving the overall accessibility of the documentation.

Possible disadvantages of GitBook

  • Pricing
    While GitBook offers a free tier, advanced features and larger projects may require a subscription, which might be expensive for smaller teams or individual developers.
  • Limited Customization
    Compared to some other documentation tools, GitBook may offer limited customization options beyond pre-defined themes, which might not meet the needs of some users for highly customized documentation.
  • Dependency on Platform
    Users are dependent on GitBook's platform and its availability, meaning any downtime or service issues on GitBook's end can affect access to and editing of documentation.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite being user-friendly, some users might still face a learning curve, especially those who are not familiar with version control or Markdown.
  • Export Options
    Exporting documentation in different formats like PDF, EPUB, or HTML may be limited or require additional steps, which can be inconvenient for users who need these features.
  • Feature Set
    Some users may find that GitBook lacks certain advanced features or integrations that other specialized documentation tools offer, potentially limiting its utility for highly technical documentation needs.

Stonly features and specs

  • Interactive Tutorials
    Stonly offers interactive step-by-step tutorials that can engage users better compared to traditional static guides. This interactivity helps in improving user comprehension and retention.
  • Customization
    The platform allows for high levels of customization, enabling organizations to tailor the tutorials and guides to match their branding and specific needs.
  • Analytics
    Stonly provides robust analytics features that allow organizations to track user interactions with guides and tutorials, helping them to understand better what works and what needs improvement.
  • Integrations
    The tool integrates with various third-party applications like Intercom, Zendesk, and more, making it easy to incorporate into existing workflows.
  • No Coding Required
    Users do not need any coding skills to create interactive guides and tutorials, making it accessible to a wider range of users within an organization.

Possible disadvantages of Stonly

  • Cost
    Stonly can be expensive, particularly for small businesses or startups with limited budgets, potentially making it less accessible for these organizations.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite being user-friendly, there is still a learning curve associated with mastering all of its features and making the most out of the platform.
  • Limited Offline Access
    Since Stonly is primarily a web-based platform, offline access to tutorials and guides is very limited, which can be a drawback in environments where internet access is unreliable.
  • Dependency on Platform
    Using a third-party platform means that organizations could become dependent on Stonly for their tutorials, which may present issues if the platform experiences downtime or other service issues.
  • Customization Limits
    Although highly customizable, there are still some limitations in design and functionality that may not meet the specific needs of every user or organization.

Analysis of GitBook

Overall verdict

  • Yes, GitBook is generally regarded as a good tool for creating and managing documentation. Its comprehensive set of features and ease of use make it a popular choice among individuals and teams who need an efficient way to organize and disseminate information.

Why this product is good

  • GitBook is often considered a good platform because it provides an intuitive and user-friendly interface for creating and publishing documentation. It supports collaboration, making it easy for teams to work together on documents. GitBook also offers features like version control, customization options, and integrations with other tools, which enhance its functionality and make it suitable for a variety of use cases.

Recommended for

  • Software development teams looking to document their projects.
  • Open-source project maintainers needing a platform for their documentation.
  • Educational institutions requiring a user-friendly way to publish learning materials.
  • Businesses needing to provide comprehensive product documentation to users.

GitBook videos

Alex Vieira on Unbiased GitBook Review Perfect for Everyone

More videos:

Stonly videos

Add and edit media in Stonly

More videos:

  • Review - AWS & Dashlane/Stonly | Les conseils du fondateur #StartupMoments

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GitBook and Stonly)
Documentation
100 100%
0% 0
User Onboarding And Engagement
Documentation As A Service & Tools
User Engagement
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using GitBook and Stonly. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare GitBook and Stonly

GitBook Reviews

Best Gitbook Alternatives You Need to Try in 2023
GitBook can be a good option for internal knowledge bases, as it offers features such as collaboration, version control, and easy customization. However, the suitability of GitBook for your specific use case depends on your organization's size, needs, and preferences.
Source: www.archbee.com
Introduction to Doxygen Alternatives In 2021
It is a standard paperwork system where all products, APIs, and internal understanding bases can be tape-recorded by teams. It’s a platform for users to believe and track concepts. Gitbook is a tool in an innovation stack in the Documentation as a Service & Tools area.
Source: www.webku.net
12 Most Useful Knowledge Management Tools for Your Business
Their doc editor is simple and powerful, allowing you to use Markdown, and code snippets, as well as embed content. Since GitBook doesn’t have a built-in code editor, you’ll have to use the integration with GitHub for coding.
Source: www.archbee.com
Doxygen Alternatives
It is a standard documentation system where all products, APIs, and internal knowledge bases can be recorded by teams. It’s a platform for users to think and track ideas. Gitbook is a tool in a technology stack in the Documentation as a Service & Tools section.
Source: www.educba.com
Doxygen Alternatives
It provides users with a platform on which they can think and keep track of ideas. Gitbook is a piece of software that may be found in the Documentation as a Service and Tools portion of a technology stack.

Stonly Reviews

11 Popular Knowledge Management Tools to Consider in 2025 
The future of customer service hinges on the quality of your knowledge. That’s why Stonly’s knowledge base platform allows you to create content that makes it easier for people to get the help they need, and deliver that help when and where it’s needed. With generative AI and powerful search, Stonly lets you turn your knowledge into instant, accurate answers.With Stonly you...
Source: knowmax.ai
8 Best Usetiful Alternatives and Competitors That Are More Professional
❌ If you want to integrate Stonly into your UI elements, and, of course, implement Stonly’s knowledge base and help center into your platform, you’ll definitely need a bunch of developer hours to get it done.
Source: userguiding.com
Top alternatives to UserGuiding
Like Usetiful and Lou, Stonly has a free forever plan limited to 5 guides, no team seats and 1000 guide views per month. Stonly Pricing

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, GitBook should be more popular than Stonly. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

GitBook mentions (5)

  • Why GitBook switched from LaunchDarkly to Bucket
    TL,DR: LaunchDarkly is great for B2C companies. Bucket is for B2B SaaS products, like GitBook — a modern, AI-integrated documentation platform. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Bucket vs LaunchDarkly — an alternative for B2B engineers
    Addison Schultz, Developer Relations Lead at GitBook, puts it simply:. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Show HN: We built a FOSS documentation CMS with a pretty GUI
    Good question that led to insightful responses. I would like to bring GitBook (https://gitbook.com) too to the comparison notes (no affiliation). They, too, focus on the collaborative, 'similar-to-git-workflow', and versioned approach towards documentation. Happy to see variety in the 'docs' tools area, and really appreciate it being FOSS. Looking forward to trying out Kalmia on some project soon. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • GitLanding: A beautiful landing page for your Github project in a matter of minutes.
    You can have both a landing page (e.g.: www.your-project.dev) and a documentation website (e.g.: docs.your-project.dev). For creating documentation website GitBook is better fit than Gitlanding. GitBook is free for open source Projects (you just need to issue a request). - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
  • How to Use GitBook for Technical Documentation
    GitBook is a collaborative documentation tool that allows anyone to document anything—such as products and APIs—and share knowledge through a user-friendly online platform. According to GitBook, “GitBook is a flexible platform for all kinds of content and collaboration.” It provides a single unified workspace for different users to create, manage and share content without using multiple tools. For example:. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago

Stonly mentions (1)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GitBook and Stonly, you can also consider the following products

Docusaurus - Easy to maintain open source documentation websites

UserGuiding - Create in-app experiences with the most straightforward product adoption platform — quick implementation, lasting user engagement.

MkDocs - Project documentation with Markdown.

Appcues - Improve user onboarding, feature activation & more — no code required! Stop waiting on dev and start increasing customer engagement today. Try it for free.

Doxygen - Generate documentation from source code

Usetiful - Fight user churn with great user onboarding. Interactive product tours and smart tips significantly improve your user retention.