GitBook VS Stack Overflow Trends
Compare GitBook VS Stack Overflow Trends and see what are their differences
Logseq is a local-first, non-linear, outliner notebook for organizing and sharing your personal knowledge base.
featured
GitBook
Docusaurus
MkDocs
Doxygen
ReadMe
Confluence
ReadTheDocs
Atlassian Bitbucket Server
Stack Overflow Trends
Stack Roboflow
Smarty Bot
Stack Overflow for Teams
Answer Bot by Intercom
CodePilot.ai
Community Questions for Confluence
ask-stack
GitBook Stack Overflow TrendsNo Stack Overflow Trends videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, Stack Overflow Trends seems to be a lot more popular than GitBook. While we know about 28 links to Stack Overflow Trends, we've tracked only 2 mentions of GitBook. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
You can have both a landing page (e.g.: www.your-project.dev) and a documentation website (e.g.: docs.your-project.dev). For creating documentation website GitBook is better fit than Gitlanding. GitBook is free for open source Projects (you just need to issue a request). - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
GitBook is a collaborative documentation tool that allows anyone to document anything—such as products and APIs—and share knowledge through a user-friendly online platform. According to GitBook, “GitBook is a flexible platform for all kinds of content and collaboration.” It provides a single unified workspace for different users to create, manage and share content without using multiple tools. For example:. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
It has, but it wasn't adopted by the pragmatists in that time. It's hard to tell if the early adopters adopted it either - It doesn't show up at all in the 2023 stack overflow survey (nor in the previous two years) - https://survey.stackoverflow.co/2023/#technology-most-popular-technologies - It doesn't show up in questions asked on Stackoverflow since 2008 -... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
> In 2017 I had React projects in production for years. I doubt that. React wasn't stable until 2015, and wasn't mainstream until 2016. > And it only got worse and the overengineering to make it looks fast in the first load is not worth it as modern JS frameworks are faster than React out-of-the-box. Again, Next.js != React; the former builds on the latter, it doesn't replace it nor does it claim to be the same... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
> Prior to Next.js, React was hard to setup and maintain No, it wasn't. > I started using Next.js in 2017. It made React a real production framework In 2017 I had React projects in production for years. > React was hard to setup and maintain and hard to make it go fast (on first load) And it only got worse and the overengineering to make it looks fast in the first load is not worth it as modern JS frameworks are... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
Based on what? https://insights.stackoverflow.com/trends?tags=python%2Cjava. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
Fair enough, my information is outdated. StackOverflow agrees. [1] [1] https://insights.stackoverflow.com/trends?tags=django%2Cruby-on-rails. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
Docusaurus - Easy to maintain open source documentation websites
Stack Roboflow - Coding questions pondered by an AI.
MkDocs - Project documentation with Markdown.
Smarty Bot - Wiki for tech teams, right where work happens
Doxygen - Generate documentation from source code
Stack Overflow for Teams - Everything you love about Stack Overflow in a private space.