Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Git Large File Storage VS BitBucket

Compare Git Large File Storage VS BitBucket and see what are their differences

Git Large File Storage logo Git Large File Storage

Git Large File Storage (LFS) replaces large files such as audio samples, videos, datasets, and graphics with text pointers.

BitBucket logo BitBucket

Bitbucket is a free code hosting site for Mercurial and Git. Manage your development with a hosted wiki, issue tracker and source code.
  • Git Large File Storage Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-13
  • BitBucket Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-09

Git Large File Storage features and specs

  • Efficient Large File Handling
    Git LFS replaces large files with text pointers inside Git, while storing the file contents on a separate server, thus optimizing repository size and performance.
  • Reduced Clone Time
    By keeping the large file content separate, clone times are significantly reduced as only pointers are initially fetched.
  • Better Storage Management
    Actual large files are stored on an external server, allowing for more efficient use of local disk space.
  • Easier Collaboration
    Facilitates collaboration on repositories containing large files by preventing performance issues typically associated with large repositories.

Possible disadvantages of Git Large File Storage

  • Requires Additional Setup
    Using Git LFS involves extra configuration and infrastructure setup, which could be challenging for new users or small teams.
  • Limited Free Storage
    Most Git host providers have storage limits and may charge for additional space, which can lead to extra costs.
  • Compatibility Issues
    Some Git clients and services might not fully support Git LFS, leading to possible compatibility issues.
  • Complexity in Managing LFS Files
    Some operations, such as moving large files between branches or repositories, can be more complex compared to handling regular files.

BitBucket features and specs

  • Integration with Atlassian Suite
    BitBucket integrates seamlessly with other Atlassian products like Jira, Confluence, and Trello, enabling end-to-end project management and enhanced collaboration capabilities.
  • Unlimited Private Repositories
    BitBucket offers unlimited private repositories, which is a significant advantage for developers and organizations that prioritize privacy and want to manage multiple projects securely.
  • Built-in CI/CD
    BitBucket Pipelines provides integrated continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) right out of the box, making it easier for teams to automate their workflows and deploy code faster.
  • Cost-Effective
    BitBucket offers competitive pricing plans, including a free tier that supports small teams with essential features, making it accessible for startups and small to medium-sized businesses.
  • Strong Branch Permissions
    BitBucket allows for granular branch permissions, enabling teams to control who can read, write, and merge their code, enhancing security and boosting code quality.

Possible disadvantages of BitBucket

  • User Interface
    Some users find BitBucket's user interface less intuitive compared to competitors like GitHub and GitLab, which can lead to a steeper learning curve for new users.
  • Performance Issues
    There can be occasional performance issues, particularly with larger repositories or heavy traffic, which can slow down the development and deployment processes.
  • Smaller Community
    BitBucket has a smaller user community compared to GitHub, which may result in fewer third-party integrations, plugins, and community-driven support resources.
  • Limited Marketplace
    The BitBucket Marketplace offers fewer integrations and extensions compared to its competitors, which might limit customization options for advanced users or larger teams.
  • Less Popular for Open Source Projects
    BitBucket is less popular for hosting open-source projects compared to platforms like GitHub, which might be a drawback for teams looking to engage with a broader open-source community.

Git Large File Storage videos

#GitHub_Git Large File Storage (LFS) Files Upload to GitHub By Git GUI Here

BitBucket videos

Bitbucket tutorial | How to use Bitbucket Cloud

More videos:

  • Review - Jira & Bitbucket Pull Request and Code Review Part-3 (Last Part)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Git Large File Storage and BitBucket)
Git
15 15%
85% 85
Code Collaboration
13 13%
87% 87
Development
100 100%
0% 0
Software Development
5 5%
95% 95

User comments

Share your experience with using Git Large File Storage and BitBucket. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Git Large File Storage and BitBucket

Git Large File Storage Reviews

We have no reviews of Git Large File Storage yet.
Be the first one to post

BitBucket Reviews

The Top 10 GitHub Alternatives
Bitbucket offers several hosting options, including Cloud, Server, and Data Centre. Each option has its own unique features and benefits. For example, Bitbucket Cloud is hosted on Atlassian’s servers and accessed via a URL. It has an exclusive built-in CI/CD tool, Pipelines, that enables you to build, test, and deploy directly from Bitbucket.
Top 7 GitHub Alternatives You Should Know (2024)
Most of the listed alternatives offer free tier plans for individuals or small teams. Tools like GitLab and Bitbucket allow users to host unlimited repositories without cost.
Source: snappify.com
Best GitHub Alternatives for Developers in 2023
Bitbucket Pipes provides over 50 plug-and-play integrations (code quality, deployment, incident management, etc.) for extended CI/CD workflow automation. Speaking of integrations, Bitbucket integrates seamlessly with other Atlassian programming tools like Opsgenie and Confluence, as well as third-party tools like CircleCI, GitHub and Jenkins.
Let's Make Sure Github Doesn't Become the only Option
The Pull Request workflow is so dominant now that it’s considered the default path for code to permanently enter into a repository. You can see a similar features in GitHub’s smaller competition Codeberg, GitLab, BitBucket, and Gitea. These competitors don’t offer other, major code collaboration tools, and their Pull Request-like features aren’t just there to help users come...
Free Data Science Tools for Students and Educators in 2020
You can get free unlimited private Git repositories at Bitbucket. If you already have a GitHub Pro, you may wonder why Bitbucket

Social recommendations and mentions

Git Large File Storage might be a bit more popular than BitBucket. We know about 103 links to it since March 2021 and only 78 links to BitBucket. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Git Large File Storage mentions (103)

  • Faster and More Reliable Hugging Face Downloads Using aria2 and GNU Parallel
    Git Large File Storage (git-lfs): An open source Git extension for versioning large files. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • AWS open source newsletter, #204
    Git-remote-s3 is a neat tool that provides you with the ability to use Amazon S3 as a Git Large File Storage (LFS) remote provider. It provides an implementation of a git remote helper to use S3 as a serverless Git server. The README provides good examples of how to set this up and example git commands that allow you to use this setup. This is pretty neat, and something I am going to try out for myself in future... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • A step-by-step guide to building an MLOps pipeline
    The meta-data and model artifacts from experiment tracking can contain large amounts of data, such as the training model files, data files, metrics and logs, visualizations, configuration files, checkpoints, etc. In cases where the experiment tool doesn't support data storage, an alternative option is to track the training and validation data versions per experiment. They use remote data storage systems such as S3... - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Git-annex: manage large files in Git without storing the contents in Git
    What's the difference between this and Git-LFS? https://git-lfs.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Aho – a Git implementation in Awk
    It doesn't, since Git's data model has to be changed to content-defined chunks to solve the issue. You should look at git-lfs[1] instead. [1] https://git-lfs.com. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
View more

BitBucket mentions (78)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Git Large File Storage and BitBucket, you can also consider the following products

Working Copy - The powerful Git client for iOS

GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.

CodeHub - CodeHub is the most complete, unofficial, client for GitHub on the iOS platform.

GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab

GVfs - Git Virtual File System (by Microsoft)

Gitea - A painless self-hosted Git service