Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Git History VS Screenful Metrics for GitHub

Compare Git History VS Screenful Metrics for GitHub and see what are their differences

Git History logo Git History

Quickly browse the history of any GitHub file Replace github.com with github.githistory.xyz in any file url.

Screenful Metrics for GitHub logo Screenful Metrics for GitHub

Analytics for GitHub Issues
  • Git History Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-13
  • Screenful Metrics for GitHub Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-19

Git History features and specs

  • Easy Visualization
    Git History provides an intuitive interface to visualize the commit history of a Git repository, making it easier to understand the project's development timeline.
  • Interactive Features
    The tool offers interactive features, such as the ability to click on specific commits to see detailed information, including lines of code changed, author, and timestamps.
  • No Installation Required
    As a web-based tool, Git History does not require any installation, allowing users to access it from any device with a web browser.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source tool, Git History allows developers to contribute improvements or customize the tool according to their needs.

Possible disadvantages of Git History

  • Limited Functionality
    Compared to robust Git clients, Git History may lack some advanced features such as rebasing or detailed branch management.
  • Performance Issues
    For large repositories, Git History might suffer from performance lags or may not handle the complexity efficiently.
  • Dependency on GitHub
    The tool requires repositories to be hosted on GitHub, limiting its use for repositories hosted on other platforms.
  • Security Concerns
    Using a web-based tool means potential exposure to security vulnerabilities, particularly if sensitive information is being accessed.

Screenful Metrics for GitHub features and specs

  • Enhanced Visibility
    Screenful Metrics provides a visual overview of development activity within GitHub, which enhances visibility into project status, progress, and bottlenecks.
  • Customizable Dashboards
    Users can customize dashboards to focus on the metrics that matter most to their team, allowing for a tailored experience and better decision-making.
  • Automated Reporting
    The tool automates the reporting process, saving time and effort while ensuring that stakeholders receive timely updates without manual intervention.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Screenful integrates smoothly with GitHub, pulling in essential data without requiring additional infrastructure or significant configuration.

Possible disadvantages of Screenful Metrics for GitHub

  • Learning Curve
    New users might encounter a learning curve when navigating the various features and fully utilizing the customization options available.
  • Pricing
    The cost of using Screenful Metrics may be a concern for smaller teams or organizations with limited budgets, as ongoing fees can accumulate.
  • Dependency on GitHub Data
    Since Screenful Metrics relies heavily on data from GitHub, any disruptions or changes in GitHub's API can potentially affect data accuracy and availability.
  • Feature Limitations
    Some users might find that certain advanced features are not as robust as they need, potentially requiring supplementary tools to fill gaps.

Git History videos

How to view git history of files in vscode | git commit history and local history without extension

Screenful Metrics for GitHub videos

No Screenful Metrics for GitHub videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Git History and Screenful Metrics for GitHub)
Git
56 56%
44% 44
Analytics
0 0%
100% 100
Data Dashboard
45 45%
55% 55
Git Tools
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Git History and Screenful Metrics for GitHub. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Git History seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Git History mentions (2)

  • Github on Steroids
    Sometime you want to know what changes have been made to a file. Github do have a history button for a file, but In my opinion, it's not really detail and still have to click a a lot of things. Luckily there is another awesome tool Git History. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
  • Scrollycoding – A new way to write code walkthroughs
    I also have this project http://githistory.xyz/, I want to make a new version of it specific for tutorials, using commit messages or git notes to display a better description of each step. - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago

Screenful Metrics for GitHub mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Screenful Metrics for GitHub yet. Tracking of Screenful Metrics for GitHub recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Git History and Screenful Metrics for GitHub, you can also consider the following products

Waydev - Waydev analyzes your codebase from Github, Gitlab, Azure DevOps & Bitbucket to help you bring out the best in your engineers work.

Git analytics - for software developers, teams, and open-source communities

Code Time - VS Code extension for automatic programming metrics

HockeyStack - Not just another simple analytics tool.

gitui - blazing fast terminal-ui for git

GitPrime - GitPrime uses data from any Git based code repository to give management the software engineering metrics needed to move faster and optimize work patterns.