Get Mad Ideas VS The State of JavaScript 2018

Find and share ridiculous app ideas

Discover the latest trends in the JavaScript ecosystem

Not present

Creative Approach
Get Mad Ideas encourages out-of-the-box thinking, which can lead to unique and innovative solutions.
Collaborative Environment
The platform fosters collaboration between users, enhancing the quality of ideas through shared input.
Resource Access
Users gain access to various resources and tools that can facilitate idea development and execution.

Limited Audience
The platform may not be widely known, which can limit the exposure and reach of ideas shared on it.
Scalability Issues
As a relatively new platform, it might face challenges in handling a large number of users or projects simultaneously.
Feature Limitations
The platform may lack certain features or functionalities that more established competitors offer.

Comprehensive Data
The survey offers a wide range of data on JavaScript libraries, frameworks, and tools, providing a broad overview of the ecosystem in 2018.
Community Insights
It offers insights directly from JavaScript developers, reflecting trends, preferences, and challenges faced by the community.
Historical Reference
Serves as a historical reference point to track the evolution and adoption of different technologies in the JavaScript world over the years.
Visual Presentation
Includes charts and graphs that make the information easy to digest and understand trends quickly.
Segmented Analysis
Provides segmented analysis of different aspects of JavaScript such as frameworks, testing, state management, etc., for more targeted insights.

Potential Bias
The survey could be subject to self-selection bias, as it depends on who chooses to participate.
Time-Sensitive Data
Being from 2018, the survey data is outdated, and the JavaScript ecosystem evolves rapidly, possibly limiting its current relevance.
Limited Demographics
May not accurately represent all JavaScript developers globally, particularly those from underrepresented regions or communities.
Depth vs. Breadth
While comprehensive, some areas may lack depth in insights compared to focused, specialized surveys or studies.
Interpretation Challenges
The results and trends can be challenging to interpret without considering external factors influencing the JavaScript ecosystem.