Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
x

Gema VS xmllint

Compare Gema VS xmllint and see what are their differences

Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

Gema logo Gema

General purpose text macro processor.

xmllint logo xmllint

command line XML tool
  • Gema Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-03-21
  • xmllint Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-16

Gema features and specs

  • Open Source
    Gema is open-source, meaning its source code is freely available for modification, distribution, and use, providing flexibility for customization and improvements by the community.
  • Text Processing Capabilities
    Gema is capable of processing text through macro expansion, which allows for efficient handling and transformation of text data input.
  • Portability
    As a lightweight tool, Gema can be used on various operating systems without requiring extensive system resources or dependencies, enhancing its usability across different environments.

Possible disadvantages of Gema

  • Limited Functionality
    Gema is specifically designed for macro processing, which may not be suitable for users seeking a more comprehensive text processing or scripting tool.
  • Learning Curve
    For new users, understanding and effectively using Gema's macro processing capabilities may present a learning curve, especially for those unfamiliar with macro languages.
  • Minimal Documentation
    Gema's documentation may not be as comprehensive as more widely used tools, potentially making it challenging for users to find assistance or detailed instructions.

xmllint features and specs

  • Validation
    xmllint can be used to validate XML documents against a DTD, which helps ensure the XML structure adheres to a predefined specification.
  • XPath Support
    It offers the ability to evaluate XPath expressions, which allows users to query specific parts of the XML document efficiently.
  • Format and Beautify
    xmllint can reformat XML documents to make them more readable, which is especially helpful for debugging and reviewing code.
  • Wide Compatibility
    As part of the libxml2 project, xmllint is compatible with various systems and supports a wide range of XML standards, making it versatile for different environments.
  • Command-line Usage
    Being a command-line tool, xmllint can be easily scripted and used in automated processes or integrated into development pipelines.

Possible disadvantages of xmllint

  • Complexity for Large Documents
    Handling very large XML documents can be computationally intensive, and xmllint might struggle with performance or memory usage in such cases.
  • Limited Error Descriptions
    Error messages produced by xmllint may not always be detailed, which can make debugging difficult for users without extensive XML knowledge.
  • No XML Schema Validation
    While xmllint supports DTD validation, it does not offer native support for validating XML Schema, which limits its applicability for XML documents based on XML Schema definitions.
  • Learning Curve
    Users unfamiliar with command-line tools may find xmllint challenging to use initially due to its text-based interface and wide range of options.
  • Limited Interactive Use
    Unlike some graphical XML tools, xmllint does not provide an interactive user interface, which may not appeal to users preferring visual tools for working with XML.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Gema and xmllint)

Gema

xmllint

Programming Language
39 39%
Programming Language
61% 61
OOP
41 41%
OOP
59% 59
Note Taking
41 41%
Note Taking
59% 59
Generic Programming Language
39 39%
Generic Programming Language
61% 61

User comments

Share your experience with using Gema and xmllint. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, xmllint seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Gema mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Gema yet. Tracking of Gema recommendations started around Mar 2021.

xmllint mentions (2)

  • Generate RSS feeds with grep(1), sed(1), and Awk(1)
    I strongly recommend adding a schema validator to anything that generates XML. ATOM¹ has a nice schema available² that you can use at the end to check the whole thing (I use xmllint³, since it is in a lot of package repositories). Another nice thing about ATOM compared to RSS is that it has the xml:base attribute, which means you do not need to rewrite relative URLs into absolute ones. You can use recode's⁴... - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago
  • looking for html beautifier
    There is also pup. Or if you want to go with a lot more options with xmllint. Of if you want just to render the html in your terminal. Source: about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Gema and xmllint, you can also consider the following products

GCC C Preprocessor (cpp) - Top (The C Preprocessor)

PP - A generic Preprocessor - P is a text preprocessor designed for Pandoc (and more generally Markdown and reStructuredText).

Xidel - Xidel is a command line tool to download html/xml pages and extract data from them using CSS 3 selectors, XPath 3 expressions or pattern-matching templates.

GPP - GPP is a general-purpose preprocessor with customizable syntax, suitable for a wide range of...

GNU M4 - GNU M4 is an implementation of the m4 macro preprocessor.

Filepp - filepp is a generic file preprocessor.

Loading...