Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Garden (Clojure) VS Sass

Compare Garden (Clojure) VS Sass and see what are their differences

Garden (Clojure) logo Garden (Clojure)

Unlike the mini-languages that are other pre/post-processor options, Garden leverages the full power of the Clojure programming language for CSS.

Sass logo Sass

Syntatically Awesome Style Sheets
  • Garden (Clojure) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-17
  • Sass Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-19

Garden (Clojure) features and specs

  • Clojure Interoperability
    Garden leverages Clojure's syntax and functional programming paradigms, enabling seamless integration with Clojure applications and allowing developers to utilize Clojure's features, such as macros and immutable data structures.
  • Powerful Abstraction
    Garden provides a high-level abstraction for styling, which allows developers to compose styles dynamically and programmatically. This can lead to more maintainable and reusable code compared to traditional CSS.
  • Live Reloading
    Garden integrates well with tools like Figwheel for hot reloading, allowing developers to see changes in styles immediately without refreshing the browser, which boosts productivity.
  • Code as Data
    By treating CSS as data, Garden allows for the manipulation and transformation of styles with the full power of Clojure's data processing capabilities, enabling complex style logic that would be cumbersome in vanilla CSS.

Possible disadvantages of Garden (Clojure)

  • Steep Learning Curve
    For developers not familiar with Clojure, the syntax and concepts might present a barrier to entry, requiring a learning period before being able to effectively use Garden.
  • Limited Adoption
    As a niche tool within the Clojure ecosystem, Garden has a smaller user base and community compared to more mainstream CSS preprocessors like SASS or LESS, which can limit the availability of community resources and plugins.
  • Performance Overhead
    Generating styles dynamically might add to the initial rendering time compared to static style sheets, which can be a concern for performance-sensitive applications.
  • Debugging Complexity
    The abstraction and dynamic nature of Garden can make debugging CSS issues more complex, as it is not as straightforward as inspecting static CSS rules in browser developer tools.

Sass features and specs

  • Nesting
    Sass allows for nested syntax, making it easier to target specific elements and providing a clear, hierarchical structure to CSS code.
  • Variables
    Sass supports variables that can store values such as colors, fonts, or any CSS value, making it simple to maintain and update styles.
  • Mixins
    Mixins in Sass enable reusable chunks of code, which can dramatically reduce redundancy and simplify complex CSS.
  • Partials and Import
    With Sass, CSS can be split into smaller, more manageable partial files which are then imported into a central stylesheet, enhancing modularity and organization.
  • Control Directives
    Sass includes control directives (such as @if, @for, @each) that allow for conditional logic and loops, providing more dynamic CSS generation.
  • Built-in Functions
    Sass offers a variety of built-in functions for manipulating colors, strings, and other values, empowering developers to create more sophisticated styles.
  • Compass and Other Frameworks
    Sass can be extended with frameworks such as Compass, which provides additional mixins and functionality, speeding up development.
  • Community and Documentation
    Sass has a strong community and comprehensive documentation, which makes it easier to find solutions to problems and learn best practices.

Possible disadvantages of Sass

  • Learning Curve
    Sass introduces various features and syntax that may require additional time and resources to learn and adopt, especially for developers new to pre-processors.
  • Dependency on Compilation
    Sass needs to be compiled into standard CSS, which requires build tools and adds an extra step in the development workflow.
  • Tooling Requirements
    Using Sass effectively often involves additional tools like Node.js, npm, and task runners (e.g., Gulp, Grunt), which can complicate setup and maintenance.
  • Performance
    In large projects, the compilation time for Sass can become noticeable, potentially slowing down the development process, especially when dealing with extensive stylesheets.
  • Compatibility
    Older projects or those not built with modern development tools might face compatibility issues when integrating Sass, requiring significant refactoring.
  • Overhead
    For smaller projects, the overhead of setting up and maintaining Sass and its related tools may not be justified compared to the benefits gained.

Garden (Clojure) videos

No Garden (Clojure) videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Sass videos

The Armalite AR10 Super SASS

More videos:

  • Review - Armalite Super SASS
  • Review - M110 SASS to 800yds: Practical Accuracy (Leupold Mk4, US Sniper Rifle)
  • Review - Anatomy of the Semi Automatic Sniper System (SASS): Featuring the Lone Star Armory TX10 DM Heavy
  • Review - ArmaLite XM110 Rifle to AR10 Super SASS

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Garden (Clojure) and Sass)
CSS Framework
10 10%
90% 90
Developer Tools
4 4%
96% 96
Design Tools
5 5%
95% 95
Development Tools
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Garden (Clojure) and Sass. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Sass seems to be a lot more popular than Garden (Clojure). While we know about 144 links to Sass, we've tracked only 2 mentions of Garden (Clojure). We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Garden (Clojure) mentions (2)

  • What working with Tailwind CSS every day for 2 years looks like
    Thanks for the vanilla-extract recommendation, I'll be using this! In my case, tailwind was useful for providing a handy set of vocabularies for simple and common stylings. But once customizations start to pile on, we're back into SCSS. Using 2 systems at once meant additionally gluing them with the postcss toolchain, so effectively we have 3 preprocessors running for every style refresh. Looking in at TypeScript... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Clojure Single Codebase?
    I spent some time doing this ~3 years ago, so I don't know about now, but to my knowledge it was the only language where you could really use one language for everything: no HTML (via hiccup), no CSS (via garden), clojure/clojurescript everywhere, and no shell (via babashka). Source: almost 3 years ago

Sass mentions (144)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Garden (Clojure) and Sass, you can also consider the following products

Stylecow - CSS processor to fix your css code and make it compatible with all browsers

PostCSS - Increase code readability. Add vendor prefixes to CSS rules using values from Can I Use. Autoprefixer will use the data based on current browser popularity and property support to apply prefixes for you.

CSS Next - Use tomorrow’s CSS syntax, today.

Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.

Stylus - EXPRESSIVE, DYNAMIC, ROBUST CSS

Bootstrap - Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions