Software Alternatives & Reviews

Garden (Clojure) VS Less

Compare Garden (Clojure) VS Less and see what are their differences

Garden (Clojure) logo Garden (Clojure)

Unlike the mini-languages that are other pre/post-processor options, Garden leverages the full power of the Clojure programming language for CSS.

Less logo Less

Less extends CSS with dynamic behavior such as variables, mixins, operations and functions. Less runs on both the server-side (with Node. js and Rhino) or client-side (modern browsers only).
  • Garden (Clojure) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-17
  • Less Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-19

Garden (Clojure)

Categories
  • Developer Tools
  • CSS Framework
  • Design Tools
  • Development Tools
Website github.com

Less

Categories
  • Developer Tools
  • Design Tools
  • CSS Framework
  • Development Tools
Website cloudhead.io

Garden (Clojure) videos

No Garden (Clojure) videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Less videos

'Less' author Andrew Sean Greer answers your questions

More videos:

  • Review - Book Review: Less by Andrew Sean Greer, reviewed by Smriti
  • Review - Book Review - Less by Andrew Sean Greer

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Garden (Clojure) and Less)
CSS Framework
38 38%
62% 62
Developer Tools
38 38%
62% 62
Design Tools
40 40%
60% 60
Development Tools
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Garden (Clojure) and Less. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Garden (Clojure) seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Garden (Clojure) mentions (2)

  • What working with Tailwind CSS every day for 2 years looks like
    Thanks for the vanilla-extract recommendation, I'll be using this! In my case, tailwind was useful for providing a handy set of vocabularies for simple and common stylings. But once customizations start to pile on, we're back into SCSS. Using 2 systems at once meant additionally gluing them with the postcss toolchain, so effectively we have 3 preprocessors running for every style refresh. Looking in at TypeScript... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Clojure Single Codebase?
    I spent some time doing this ~3 years ago, so I don't know about now, but to my knowledge it was the only language where you could really use one language for everything: no HTML (via hiccup), no CSS (via garden), clojure/clojurescript everywhere, and no shell (via babashka). Source: over 1 year ago

Less mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Less yet. Tracking of Less recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Garden (Clojure) and Less, you can also consider the following products

Stylecow - CSS processor to fix your css code and make it compatible with all browsers

Sass - Syntatically Awesome Style Sheets

CSS Next - Use tomorrow’s CSS syntax, today.

PostCSS - Increase code readability. Add vendor prefixes to CSS rules using values from Can I Use. Autoprefixer will use the data based on current browser popularity and property support to apply prefixes for you.

Stylus - EXPRESSIVE, DYNAMIC, ROBUST CSS

Rework - Let's Make Work Better. Research, ideas, and practices from Google and others, to put people first.