Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

FreeBSD Jails VS runc

Compare FreeBSD Jails VS runc and see what are their differences

FreeBSD Jails logo FreeBSD Jails

Jails on the other hand permit software packages to view the system egoistically, as if each package had the machine to itself.

runc logo runc

CLI tool for spawning and running containers according to the OCI specification - opencontainers/runc
  • FreeBSD Jails Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-12-19
  • runc Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-21

FreeBSD Jails features and specs

  • Isolation
    FreeBSD Jails provide process isolation, allowing multiple processes to run independently without affecting each other.
  • Security
    Jails offer an added layer of security by restricting the resources and access of applications, reducing potential attack surfaces.
  • Resource Management
    Jails allow for fine-grained control over resource allocation, enabling administrators to manage CPU, memory, and network usage per jail.
  • Simplicity
    Compared to full virtualization solutions, jails are lightweight and simple to set up, making them easier to deploy and manage.
  • Compatibility
    Running on the FreeBSD operating system, jails are inherently compatible with FreeBSD applications and services.

Possible disadvantages of FreeBSD Jails

  • Limited Isolation
    While jails provide process isolation, they share the same kernel, which may lead to using kernel-level exploits to escape the jail.
  • FreeBSD Specific
    Jails are specific to FreeBSD, meaning they cannot natively run software designed for other operating systems without adaptation.
  • Complex Networking
    Configuring networking in jails can be complex and may require careful setup to ensure proper isolation and performance.
  • Resource Contention
    Since all jails run on the same host system, high resource usage by one jail can affect the performance of others if not managed properly.
  • Lack of GUI and Advanced Features
    FreeBSD Jails focus on providing a command-line environment with limited graphical support, which may not be suitable for all applications.

runc features and specs

  • Standardization
    runc is part of the Open Containers Initiative (OCI), promoting standardization across container runtimes. This ensures interoperability and broad community support.
  • Lightweight
    As a lightweight and fast CLI tool, runc provides a minimal runtime for environments where resource efficiency is critical.
  • Security
    runc adheres to principles of secure software development and incorporates Linux kernel features like namespaces and cgroups to enhance security.
  • Broad Adoption
    As the reference implementation for OCI, runc is widely adopted and tested in production environments, ensuring reliability.
  • Flexibility
    runc offers the flexibility to handle low-level container configurations, making it suitable for advanced users needing granular control.

Possible disadvantages of runc

  • Complexity for Beginners
    The low-level nature of runc can be daunting for beginners who might prefer higher-level tools like Docker that abstract away complexities.
  • Minimalist Design
    While its simplicity is an advantage, runc lacks some of the advanced features and orchestration capabilities found in other container platforms.
  • Manual Configurations
    Users need to manually handle configurations, which can be error-prone and time-consuming compared to automated solutions.
  • Ecosystem Integration
    runc does not provide direct integration with tools and platforms by default, requiring additional setup for comprehensive ecosystem support.
  • Limited Features
    Compared to complete container platforms, runc offers fewer built-in features, requiring supplementary tools to achieve similar functionalities.

FreeBSD Jails videos

20 Years of FreeBSD Jails (2019)

More videos:

  • Demo - FreeBSD Jails Brief demo

runc videos

2/21/19 RunC Vulnerability Gives Root Access on Container Systems| AT&T ThreatTraq

More videos:

  • Review - Demo MONEY,TIME - RunC

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to FreeBSD Jails and runc)
Developer Tools
52 52%
48% 48
Web Servers
0 0%
100% 100
Containers As A Service
100 100%
0% 0
Web And Application Servers

User comments

Share your experience with using FreeBSD Jails and runc. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, FreeBSD Jails should be more popular than runc. It has been mentiond 32 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

FreeBSD Jails mentions (32)

  • Why do I run FreeBSD for my home servers
    I understand what you mean re: Arch wiki (I'm a fan of it even though not an arch user) but I genuinely suggest you go over and read some of the FreeBSD Handbook. It is a cohesive whole which can be read from start to finish (it is an actual book). This is also how the whole system feels as well (as others have commented). Things are integrated and coherent. Example: freebsd has its own libc, and the kernel... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • Its possible to install FreeBSD ina External USB HDD?
    You can install FreeBSD on an external disk. The FreeBSD Handbook answers the other questions. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • FreeBSD docs a good start to start the journey?
    I have an veeery old notebook (Toshiba tecra s2) and wanted to give this machine a new life. Learning about unix and so on. Are the docs on https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/handbook/ a good start for this? Or does someone has any recommendations? Source: about 2 years ago
  • how well would freebsd perform on a development / study laptop?
    In the official handbook read chapters 1-5, 13, & 19 to get oriented. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Distro for a Software Engineer.
    The system that exhibits the best software engineering in its development and in the software packaging process is undoubtedly FreeBSD -- it wouldn't hurt to look at it more carefully. I build all of my desktop (Gnome/Plasma/XFCE) and math and programming languages / editors from source code on FreeBSD using the latest stable operating system release (13.1, soon to be 13.2). See the FreeBSD Journal to get an... Source: over 2 years ago
View more

runc mentions (11)

  • Setup multi node kubernetes cluster using kubeadm
    For kubeadm , kubetlet , kubectl should same version package in this lab I used v1.31 to have 1.31.7 References: Https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/networking/ports-and-protocols/ Https://kubernetes.io/docs/setup/production-environment/tools/kubeadm/install-kubeadm/ Https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/releases/... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Comparing 3 Docker container runtimes - Runc, gVisor and Kata Containers
    Previously I wrote about the multiple variants of Docker and also the dependencies behind the Docker daemon. One of the dependencies was the container runtime called runc. That is what creates the usual containers we are all familiar with. When you use Docker, this is the default runtime, which is understandable since it was started by Docker, Inc. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • You run containers, not dockers - Discussing Docker variants, components and versioning
    Now we have dockerd which uses containerd, but containerd will not create containers directly. It needs a runtime and the default runtime is runc, but that can be changed. Containerd actually doesn't have to know the parameters of the runtime. There is a shim process between containerd and runc, so containerd knows the parameters of the shim, and the shim knows the parameters of runc or other runtimes. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • US Cybersecurity: The Urgent Need for Memory Safety in Software Products
    It's interesting that, in light of things like this, you still see large software companies adding support for new components written in non-memory safe languages (e.g. C) As an example Red Hat OpenShift added support for crun(https://github.com/containers/crun), which is written in C as an alternative to runc, which is written in Go( - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Why did the Krustlet project die?
    Yeah, runtimeClass lets you specify which CRI plugin you want based on what you have available. Here's an example from the containerd documentation - you could have one node that can run containers under standard runc, gvisor, kata containers, or WASM. Without runtimeClass, you'd need either some form of custom solution or four differently configured nodes to run those different runtimes. That's how krustlet did... Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing FreeBSD Jails and runc, you can also consider the following products

Apache Mesos - Apache Mesos abstracts resources away from machines, enabling fault-tolerant and elastic distributed systems to easily be built and run effectively.

Docker Hub - Docker Hub is a cloud-based registry service

rkt - App Container runtime

Apache Thrift - An interface definition language and communication protocol for creating cross-language services.

Eureka - Eureka is a contact center and enterprise performance through speech analytics that immediately reveals insights from automated analysis of communications including calls, chat, email, texts, social media, surveys and more.

Docker - Docker is an open platform that enables developers and system administrators to create distributed applications.