FreeBASIC VS Ruby

FreeBASIC Reviews

1. Jose Galeno    

   about 3 years ago
   Can Not to Comapre FREEBASIC is a COMPILER NOT AN IDE

   HAS IDE AS FBEdit, FBNP,WINFBE, VisualFB, etc

   🏁 Competitors: Visual Basic

   👍 Pros:    Compiler|32|64|Windows linux mac|Mingw32 and mingw64|Free to use|Binding to c, c++

Ruby Reviews

FreeBASIC mentions (5)

• Microsoft's Growing Control of Linux

  Outside of Microsoft created QB64: - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QB64 - https://lunduke.substack.com/p/the-wild-events-that-nearly-took Outside of Microsoft created Visual Basic IDE: - http://gambas.sourceforge.net/en/main.html - https://github.com/wekan/hx/tree/main/prototypes/ui/gambas Outside of Microsoft created FreeBasic: - https://freebasic.net. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

• qb.js: An implementation of QBASIC in Javascript

  If you have linux or windows, you can try freebasic. I believe it has a qbasic compatibility mode. Source: over 2 years ago

• Ask HN: What are your opinions on modern BASIC dialects?

  Have you looked at https://freebasic.net/ and https://www.qb64.org/portal/ ? It's been ages since I actually wrote code in BASIC, but there do appear to be nice open-source options in the modern world. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

• How to compile a BASIC code in linux ?

  I used https://freebasic.net/ ages ago. Works fine. Source: about 3 years ago

• Blank Projects - Then And Now

  And here you can live though that pain again: https://freebasic.net/. Source: about 3 years ago

Ruby mentions (3)

• A full-stack serverless application with AssemblyLift and Next.js

  The counter function is written in Ruby. Since Ruby is an interpreted language, AssemblyLift deploys a customized Ruby 3.1 interpreter compiled to WebAssembly, which executes the function handler. Since the interpreter is somewhat large, the cold-start time of a Ruby function tends to be larger than that of a Rust function. Our counter is being run in the backround, so we're fine with it being a little bit laggy... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• Why is no one promoting ruby?

  But, in general I was told use rubyapi.org unless you _really_ want to stick with the ruby-lang.org docs for all you do (which is fine) or to dig more into some object hierarchy, etc. Source: almost 2 years ago

• Looking for pwsh (core/open source, v7) integration w/ rbenv, asdf

  [2] 'rbenv' - https://github.com/rbenv/rbenv - Ruby version management utility. Run something like rbenv install 3.1.1 to install that version on your system (requires related project ruby-build), then rbenv local 3.1.1 in your code's directory to specify that for any ruby command in that directory only, you want to use version 3.1.1 that you installed through rbenv. Does other useful stuff too. Only does Ruby,... Source: about 2 years ago