Forklift VS Azure File Storage

Forklift Reviews

Azure File Storage Reviews

Forklift mentions (32)

• macOS Finder is still bad at network file copies

  Forklift (https://binarynights.com/) and Path Finder (https://www.cocoatech.io/) are the two big ones I think. - Source: Hacker News / 29 days ago

• Double Commander – Changes in version 1.1.0

  If you're on Mac, you might also want to try Forklift – by coincidence, they just release major version 4 yesterday. https://binarynights.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

• Total Commander

  There are couple which will have two panels by default, but in my opinion, ForkLift is very native macOS commander-like app -- https://binarynights.com. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

• Finder alternatives for performance?

  Forklift is what I use though never with that many files in a single directory. I know I have used it for ones that had 1000+ files with no slowness. It has a free trial so give it a try. Source: 11 months ago

• DESKTOP2 – A Graphical User Interface for DOS

  Heh, I've been there as well a decade ago when switching from windows to macos. Far manager was also the first program I'd also install on any box. I can assure you, this will eventually pass :) To be fair, far is also not a match to modern file browsers like https://binarynights.com (forklift), especially if you need s3 integration etc. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago

Azure File Storage mentions (13)

• Searching for online alternative for a synology

  Azure Files perhaps? Or if you need frequently accessed files to be quicker then Azure File Sync. Source: 11 months ago

• How To Upload and Delete files in Azure Blob Storage Using Blazor Apps With .NET 7

  ​To know more details: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/products/storage/files/. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

• Hosted, mappable storage?

  If you have a use case that affords any kind of budget, maybe consder Azure Files. It is an SMB share you access over the internet. Basically, windows file server but hardened and entirely managed by Microsoft. This is as hands-off as it gets for an SMB share. Source: about 1 year ago

• Microsoft cloud drive options

  I have a client that (finally!) decided to go all-in on Azure; I had prepared the owner to expect additional costs based on their need for a file share -- I was expecting to have to use Azure Files. Source: over 1 year ago

• Sharing a folder between organizations shows in the file browser?

  I agree with the SharePoint, though another option would be Azure Files. Source: over 1 year ago