Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Forestry.io VS autoComplete.js

Compare Forestry.io VS autoComplete.js and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Forestry.io logo Forestry.io

A simple CMS for Jekyll and Hugo sites.

autoComplete.js logo autoComplete.js

Simple autocomplete pure vanilla Javascript library.
  • Forestry.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-08
  • autoComplete.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-07-12

Forestry.io features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Forestry.io offers an intuitive interface that is easy to navigate, making it accessible for both technical and non-technical users.
  • Git Integration
    Seamless integration with Git repositories allows for version control and collaboration, ensuring content consistency and traceability.
  • Static Site Generator Compatibility
    Supports a variety of static site generators such as Jekyll, Hugo, and Gatsby, providing flexibility in choosing the best framework for your needs.
  • Real-Time Preview
    Provides real-time previews of content changes, enabling users to see how updates will look before they are published.
  • Markdown Support
    Offers robust support for Markdown, making it easier to format and manage content.
  • Customizable
    Highly customizable, allowing users to define content models, fields, and custom workflows to fit their specific needs.
  • Collaborative Editing
    Supports collaborative editing, enabling multiple users to work on the same content simultaneously.

Possible disadvantages of Forestry.io

  • Learning Curve for Non-Technical Users
    While the interface is user-friendly, non-technical users might initially struggle with concepts like Git and static site generators.
  • Dependency on External Tools
    Relies heavily on Git and static site generators, meaning you need to have these set up and integrated properly for optimal use.
  • Performance Issues
    Some users have reported performance issues, particularly with larger repositories or more complex site setups.
  • Limited Built-In Hosting
    Forestry.io focuses on content management and does not provide its own hosting solution, so you'll need a separate provider for deploying your site.
  • Pricing
    Might be considered expensive for smaller projects or individual users, especially when compared to other content management systems.
  • Support and Documentation
    While generally good, some users have found the available support and documentation lacking in certain areas, making it harder to troubleshoot issues.
  • Security
    As with any third-party service, there are inherent security risks. Ensuring the security of your Git repositories and sensitive data requires additional vigilance.

autoComplete.js features and specs

  • Lightweight
    autoComplete.js is a lightweight library, with a very small file size, making it fast to load and easy to integrate without significantly impacting page performance.
  • Easy to Implement
    The library is straightforward and easy to integrate into any project, providing a quick setup process with minimal configuration needed to get started.
  • Customizable
    Offers various customization options, allowing developers to modify appearance and behavior to fit the specific needs of their application.
  • No Dependencies
    autoComplete.js does not rely on external libraries like jQuery, making it a stand-alone solution that reduces dependency management concerns.
  • Accessibility Features
    The library includes accessibility support, such as keyboard navigation, which enhances usability for users with disabilities.

Possible disadvantages of autoComplete.js

  • Limited Features
    Compared to more comprehensive libraries, autoComplete.js has a more limited feature set, which may not suffice for very complex implementations.
  • Community Support
    autoComplete.js has a smaller community, meaning there might be fewer third-party resources, plugins, or updated guides available compared to more popular libraries.
  • Scalability
    For projects with large-scale requirements or complex data structures, the lightweight nature of the library might pose limitations in terms of scalability.
  • Customization Complexity
    While customization is a benefit, it may require deeper knowledge of CSS and JavaScript to fully leverage the customization potential, which can be a hurdle for some developers.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Forestry.io and autoComplete.js)
CMS
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Blogging
100 100%
0% 0
Custom Search Engine
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Forestry.io and autoComplete.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Forestry.io and autoComplete.js

Forestry.io Reviews

Best Headless CMS for 2020
Forestry.io is a Git-backed CMS for websites and web products built using static site generators. Forestry bridges the gap between developers and their teams, by making development fun and easy while providing powerful content management for their teams. Visit site here
Source: dev.to

autoComplete.js Reviews

We have no reviews of autoComplete.js yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Forestry.io seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 35 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Forestry.io mentions (35)

  • Show HN: Self-hosted CMS on Cloudflare for podcast/blog/images/videos/docs/URLs
    Forestry has been on my radar for a long time but never had a need to use it https://forestry.io/ The big draw for me is it's just Hugo/Gatsby/Jekyll underneath, and the output files can be delivered anywhere that will host static files (CloudFlare pages does this really well, as does Netlify). - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • How would you build a website for someone who would like to update it often?
    I've done this before using Forestry.io, though I'm sure there's other similar solutions. Source: over 2 years ago
  • free-for.dev
    Forestry.io — Headless CMS. Give your editors the power of Git. Create and edit Markdown-based content with ease. Comes with three free sites that includes 3 editors, Instant Previews. Integrates with blogs hosted on Netlify/GitHubpages/ elsewhere. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Easier way to publish changes for hugo static blog?
    (Sorry. Bit late to the party) If you have github and don't mind external services (for content management) you could look at this via https://forestry.io. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: Apps that are built with Git as the back end?
    This is an excelling CMS: https://forestry.io/ I used it as the editorial interface for a little static blog: https://www.wildernessprime.com/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
View more

autoComplete.js mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of autoComplete.js yet. Tracking of autoComplete.js recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Forestry.io and autoComplete.js, you can also consider the following products

VuePress - A static site generator by Vue.js 🛠️

Angular InstantSearch by Algolia - Build beautiful search UX on top of Angular

Sanity.io - Sanity.io a platform for structured content that comes with an open-source editor that you can customize with React.js.

InstantSearch iOS by Algolia - Build beautiful Search UX in Swift & Objective-C

Publii - Open Source CMS for Static Websites

Vue InstantSearch by Algolia - Build beautiful Search UX on top of Vue.js & Laravel