fonticons VS Hush Nag Blocker

> bundle it with something like https://fortawesome.com/ Using FA as a CDN is not GDPR compliant, either. Generally speaking using any public CDN is not GDPR compliant. If you _could_ self host the files, then you can not meet the necessity test required for any of the relevant legal basis in GDPR art 6(1). Google Fonts and FA are worse, because the personal data is shipped off wholesale to the USA. Neither FA or... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

+1 It's not even clear if using Google Fonts is GDPR compliant (since you're leaking the fact that your visitor has visited your website): https://github.com/google/fonts/issues/1495 Even if you do want to use your own custom pretty font on your site, just self host it, or bundle it with something like https://fortawesome.com/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

This seems similar to the ‘Hush’ extension for Safari: https://oblador.github.io/hush/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

Maybe this will do the trick: https://oblador.github.io/hush/. Source: over 1 year ago

No I don’t think, but is a good law, only badly implemented, just use a cookie banner blocker like Hush -> https://oblador.github.io/hush/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

Hush is a great ad-block https://oblador.github.io/hush/ instructions on the page. Source: almost 2 years ago

> Declining is always a multi-step process with various checkboxes. https://oblador.github.io/hush/ You're welcome! - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago