Font Awesome VS RocketCake

Font Awesome Reviews

RocketCake Reviews

1. Erik

   about 2 years ago
   Great editor, does everything you need

   I created a few nice looking websites with the free version of RocketCake - it it very easy to use and simply gets out of the way. It has all the options I need and you can create complicated stuff with mostly a few clicks.

   🏁 Competitors: Adobe Dreamweaver, Sandvox, WYSIWYG Web Builder, NetObjects Fusion

   👍 Pros:    Easy to use|Quick and easy|Fully responsive

   👎 Cons:    None so far

Font Awesome mentions (127)

• Creating Gradient Buttons with Animated Text using CSS

  The I element is the icon of the button, I'm using fontawesome.com for the icon, the class fa-apple retrives Apple icon for us. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago

• How to build a Good Portfolio Website - My Approach.

  Icons: Fontawesome Development: HTML, SCSS, JavaScript Deployment: Github + Netlify. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago

• Adding Symbols in text.

  For generic icons (i.e. You just need a d6 and not a system-specific d6 option), Foundry has Font Awesome which are easy to search, then copy and insert, and always look good inline. Source: 5 months ago

• [Accessibility] Points to Consider When Adding aria-label to Icon Font Elements

  The following is an example of defining Font Awesome:. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago

• A Developer’s Guide to Implementing a Design System (Part 1)

  Of course, we have many different ways of solving this problem. Some of the most common include pre-existing third-party icon libraries (such as Font Awesome), icons bundled into a third-party component library (like the Kendo UI Icons), or a completely custom set of icons designed and maintained by your design team. Obviously, going 100% custom will require more work (on both the design and dev side), but might... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago

RocketCake mentions (0)