Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Flowbase VS LT Browser by Lambdatest

Compare Flowbase VS LT Browser by Lambdatest and see what are their differences

Limey
Limey: Connect smarter with QR codes, links, sites, and digital business cards in one place. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

Flowbase logo Flowbase

Curated Webflow assets, templates & guides

LT Browser by Lambdatest logo LT Browser by Lambdatest

LT Browser is a free dev friendly browser for developers and testers. You can see mobile view of website on different screen sizes and resolution on 50+ pre installed view ports. You can build, test and debug your website faster then ever.
  • Flowbase Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-01
  • LT Browser by Lambdatest Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-11

With LT Browser, you can see mobile view of website on different screen sizes and resolution. With over 50+ devices to choose from, mobile website test hasn't been much easier. Use LT Browser and ensure that your website is mobile responsive. You can create your own custom devices and save it for future uses. Create new mobile, tablet or desktop devices and test website on various devices, screen resolution and perform screen resolution test for website on different screen sizes. You don’t have to switch between two devices to perform mobile website test. Test on two devices simultaneously with LT Browser and perform mobile website test on different tablet and desktop devices and inspect website on different resolution and resolution simultaneously. LT Browser comes with Dev Tool to debug multiple devices while performing responsiveness test on your devices simultaneously. Test website on various devices simultaneously with separate Dev Tools for each device.

Flowbase features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Flowbase provides templates and components that simplify the design process, making it accessible for users without extensive design experience.
  • Customization
    The platform offers high levels of customization, allowing users to tailor their Webflow projects to specific needs and preferences.
  • Time Efficiency
    By using pre-built components and templates, users can significantly reduce the time required to build and deploy websites.
  • Design Quality
    Flowbase's templates are often designed by professionals, ensuring that projects maintain a high standard of modern design.
  • Learning Resource
    It provides guidance and resources that can help users learn more about design principles and Webflow usage.

Possible disadvantages of Flowbase

  • Cost
    Accessing premium templates and components on Flowbase may require additional payment, which could be a drawback for budget-conscious users.
  • Dependency
    Relying heavily on templates can lead to a lack of originality, making websites look similar and potentially harming brand uniqueness.
  • Limited Support
    Some users may find the level of customer support insufficient compared to other platforms, affecting their experience if they encounter issues.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its ease of use, there might still be a learning curve for users new to Webflow or those unfamiliar with web design concepts.
  • Platform Limitation
    As a third-party resource, updates or changes to Webflow could affect the compatibility or functionality of Flowbase components.

LT Browser by Lambdatest features and specs

  • Responsive Testing
    LT Browser allows users to test their websites on a variety of screen sizes and resolutions, ensuring that the site is responsive and performs well on all devices.
  • Pre-built Device Viewports
    The tool comes with a wide range of pre-built device viewports which can simulate different devices' screens, making it easier to perform cross-device testing.
  • Local Testing
    Users can perform local testing, allowing them to test and debug their websites in the development phase without having to deploy them.
  • Network Throttling
    LT Browser includes network throttling features that enable users to test their websites under different network conditions, such as 3G, 4G, and slower connections.
  • Collaborative Features
    The tool provides features for easy bug logging and sharing of test results with team members, fostering better collaboration.
  • Performance Reports
    Users receive detailed performance reports that help identify and rectify issues affecting the website's performance across different devices.
  • Integration with Popular Tools
    LT Browser integrates with a range of popular development tools such as Slack, JIRA, and Asana, streamlining workflows and improving productivity.

Possible disadvantages of LT Browser by Lambdatest

  • Subscription Cost
    LT Browser requires a subscription, which might be a consideration for small teams or individual developers who have budget constraints.
  • Learning Curve
    Though user-friendly, new users may face a slight learning curve in navigating and leveraging all the features effectively.
  • Limited Free Features
    The free version has limited features, potentially requiring users to upgrade to paid plans to access advanced functionalities.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running multiple devices and resolution tests simultaneously can be resource-intensive, possibly affecting the performance of less powerful systems.
  • No Offline Mode
    An active internet connection is required to use many of the features, meaning you cannot perform tests offline.

Analysis of LT Browser by Lambdatest

Overall verdict

  • LT Browser is considered a good tool for developers and QA testers looking for an efficient way to validate the responsiveness of web applications. It integrates well with other testing tools and platforms, offers a range of customizable viewport options, and supports local testing. Users appreciate its user-friendly design and the ability to sync with the development workflow seamlessly.

Why this product is good

  • LT Browser by LambdaTest is designed for developers and testers who need to ensure their websites are mobile responsive. It offers a straightforward interface that allows users to test the appearance and functionality of web pages across different devices and viewports. The tool supports a wide range of device resolutions and allows side-by-side comparisons, which can be crucial for identifying and resolving responsive design issues quickly.

Recommended for

    LT Browser is recommended for web developers, QA testers, and UI/UX designers who regularly work on responsive web designs. It's particularly useful for those managing projects where cross-device consistency is crucial. Additionally, it's beneficial for agile teams that require fast feedback loops and efficient collaboration.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Flowbase and LT Browser by Lambdatest)

Flowbase

LT Browser by Lambdatest

Design Tools
86 86%
Design Tools
14% 14
Browser Testing
0 0%
Browser Testing
100% 100
Website Builder
100 100%
Website Builder
0% 0
Website Testing
0 0%
Website Testing
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Flowbase and LT Browser by Lambdatest. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Flowbase and LT Browser by Lambdatest

Flowbase Reviews

We have no reviews of Flowbase yet.
Be the first one to post

LT Browser by Lambdatest Reviews

  1. Alick
    · Team Lead at Partnerize ·
    Our go to mobile testing tool

    LT Browser is the new defacto tool for responsive testing requirements. Being a ecommerce company with wide audience we need to stay on our toes to keep our users bouncing because of a UI bug. LT browser has been helping us for the past 3 months with testing on the latest mobile view ports. And my favorite feature is instant local testing by simply adding the URL and side by side comparison of two devices. And best part of the debugging is that we can see the changes being reflected in real time

    🏁 Competitors: BrowserStack, CrossBrowserTesting
    👍 Pros:    Latest devices resolution|Scroll sync with two devices|Intuitive interface|Integration with jira|Instant screenshot and bug reporting flow|Testing on various networks
    👎 Cons:    Cross browser testing is not possible|Missing the test analytics
  2. chris-hewins
    · QA Engineer at Toast Inc ·
    Helped us develop mobile websites faster

    As website designers our team loves the way we can show all the progress to our clients. It helped us have a better transparency in our work. We can just screengrab the viewport and easily share it with clients. And the best part is the interface, it's intuitive enough that none of us have ever looked at the support doc. Ability to test the local url path and Integration with JIRA saves a lot of time and makes it easier to communicate within the team. Kudos Team LT Browser..!!

    🏁 Competitors: Blisk Browser
    👍 Pros:    45+ viewports to choose from|Intuitive ui and viewport comparison feature for quick visualisation|Can make changes on the go with the help of inbuilt development tools|Mobile touch feature helps to test user experience in mobile viewports.
    👎 Cons:    Comparison is available for only 2 viewports, it forces users to select and deselect the devices repeatedly. a grid with more devices can be a better solution
  3. Alina-Novikava
    · Software QA Engineer at uTest ·
    Must have tool for web designers & developers

    Responsive testing can be a really daunting task. To ensure that all media queries are working properly for specific screen sizes is bound to be time consuming. However, LT browser has made the task comparatively easy for me and my team. It enabled us to test on multiple pre installed devices in no time. Plus, we can test over 2 devices at the same time in a side by side view.

    Our development team relies heavily over this tool since it offers hassle-free local testing experience, supports hot-reloading and offers developer tools to help us debug any UI bug on the go.

    Even our design team loves the LT browser due to its intuitiveness. They are always intrigued to check if the changes are rendering well and as per the design or not after every release cycle. With LT browser, they can do it easily without having to install anything or dealing with developer tools mobile-view debugging

    🏁 Competitors: Blisk
    👍 Pros:    You can integrate project management tools like jira|Simulate network bandwidth to test your website.|It offers two device views, which makes comparing easy by mirroring actions.|You get 30+ pre installed devices to test on and also make your own custom resolution device.
    👎 Cons:    Testing on an internet explorer using our custom device, there is no option!

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Flowbase and LT Browser by Lambdatest, you can also consider the following products

Relume Library - Say goodbye to building Webflow websites from scratch.

browserling - Live interactive cross-browser testing from your browser.

uncoverLAB - Never start from blank Figma ever again! Website design compoenents, app flows and color palettes!

CrossBrowserTesting - Browser Testing made simple! Run automated, visual, and manual tests on 1500+ real browsers and mobile devices. Test more browsers, in less time.

SystemFlow - Designer-First Framework for Webflow

Browsershots - Browsershots makes screenshots of your web design in different browsers.

Loading...