Flow Type VS Perl

Flow Type Reviews

Perl Reviews

Flow Type mentions (24)

• Is TypeScript actually worth It?

  I love JS, but I want types. I don't want TypeScript though, but I'll do it if the job requires it. Has anyone tried building in flow for a large project? This was facebook's static type checking approach: https://flow.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

• How I improved my JS code with these 3 functions

  In my examples, I’ll use the Flow type system so that it’s easier to follow the idea. The code consists of two parts: a service API and a recommendation flow. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• Guido van Rossum: Python and the Future of Programming | Lex Fridman Podcast #341

  You think we could try to make it such that people use JS + Flow the static type checker. Source: over 1 year ago

• Front-end Guide

  The two biggest contenders in adding static types to JavaScript are Flow (by Facebook) and TypeScript (by Microsoft). As of date, there is no clear winner in the battle. For now, we have made the choice of using Flow. We find that Flow has a lower learning curve as compared to TypeScript and it requires relatively less effort to migrate an existing code base to Flow. Being built by Facebook, Flow has better... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• Flow - a little language I've been working on

  Just FYI, Facebook has a JS dialect called Flow. There was a point in time that Flow and TypeScript were duking it out, but clearly TS has won. I think Flow is still used inside Facebook, but I don't think it has really caught on in the larger developer ecosystem. Source: over 1 year ago

Perl mentions (5)

• CamelFace

  But what would be a better symbol? I just saw, that perl.org also has a littel camel face on the site :-). Source: 10 months ago

• What are your coolest tools for one-liners ?

  And just while I wrote this I saw this on perl.org which may be an interesting read (although I prefer writing some things in Bash despite being a 20 year+ perl user). Source: over 1 year ago

• Precedence

  I'm going through the textbook "Beginning Perl" located at perl.org, and I'm having a confuse with one of the example questions. I'm supposed to determine the order of operations for 26 + 3 ^ 4 * 2. According to the precedence table in the textbook, + and * come before ^. So I think the answer should be ((26 + 3) ^ (4 * 2)), but the book says the answer is 26 + (3 ^ (4 * 2)). Can anyone help me figure out what... Source: almost 2 years ago

• How to run/debug perl from Vs:code

  See "A regularly updated compendium of Perl IDEs to be hosted on perl.org" at https://grants.perlfoundation.org/. Source: almost 3 years ago

• Perling and Curling

  Use Net::Curl::Easier; Use Net::Curl::Promiser::Mojo; Use Mojo::Promise; My $easy1 = Net::Curl::Easier->new( url => 'http://perl.org', followlocation => 1, ); My $easy2 = Net::Curl::Easier->new( username => 'hal', userpwd => 'itsasecret', url => 'imap://mail.example.com/INBOX/;UID=123', ); My $easy3 = Net::Curl::Easier->new( username => 'hal', userpwd => 'itsasecret', url =>... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago