Flow Type VS Babel

I love JS, but I want types. I don't want TypeScript though, but I'll do it if the job requires it. Has anyone tried building in flow for a large project? This was facebook's static type checking approach: https://flow.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

In my examples, I’ll use the Flow type system so that it’s easier to follow the idea. The code consists of two parts: a service API and a recommendation flow. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

You think we could try to make it such that people use JS + Flow the static type checker. Source: over 1 year ago

The two biggest contenders in adding static types to JavaScript are Flow (by Facebook) and TypeScript (by Microsoft). As of date, there is no clear winner in the battle. For now, we have made the choice of using Flow. We find that Flow has a lower learning curve as compared to TypeScript and it requires relatively less effort to migrate an existing code base to Flow. Being built by Facebook, Flow has better... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

Just FYI, Facebook has a JS dialect called Flow. There was a point in time that Flow and TypeScript were duking it out, but clearly TS has won. I think Flow is still used inside Facebook, but I don't think it has really caught on in the larger developer ecosystem. Source: over 1 year ago

Some of the most popular JavaScript linting tools are ESLint, JSHint, JSLint and JSCS. We're going to be using ESLint. It’s very flexible, easy to use and has the best ES6 support, which will be helpful if we introduce more modern JavaScript (that will be transpiled for older browsers using https://babeljs.io/). All rules for ESLint can be found here: https://eslint.org/docs/rules/. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago

This simply extends the existing build process that many front-end frameworks have. After Babel's done with its transpilation, it merely executes code to compile your initial screen into static HTML and CSS. This isn't entirely dissimilar from how SSR hydrates your initial screen, but it's done at compile-time, not at request time. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago

First, we switched the default compiler for new projects from Babel to SWC (Speedy Web Compiler). SWC is dramatically faster than Babel and requires zero configuration. We’ll continue to support Babel in any project currently using it. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

Nuxt.js is an open-source JavaScript framework built on Vue.js, Node.js, Vite, and Babel.js used for creating fast, cutting-edge applications. Nuxt.js possesses similar features to Next.js, with the major difference being the web framework it is compatible with. Next.js is a React framework whereas Nuxt.js is a Vue framework. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago

Disclaimer: If you've already developed Babel or ESLint plugins, this article may not be as beneficial for you, as you're likely already familiar with the majority of the content covered here. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago