Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Flexbox Froggy VS EJS

Compare Flexbox Froggy VS EJS and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Flexbox Froggy logo Flexbox Froggy

A game for learning CSS flexbox

EJS logo EJS

An open source JavaScript Template library.
  • Flexbox Froggy Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-08
  • EJS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-11

Flexbox Froggy features and specs

  • Interactive Learning
    Flexbox Froggy offers an interactive environment where users can practice Flexbox concepts through hands-on exercises, making learning more engaging and effective.
  • Visual Feedback
    The game provides immediate visual feedback, helping users quickly understand the impact of their code and learn through trial and error.
  • Gamified Experience
    Flexbox Froggy transforms learning into a game, which can keep users motivated and make the process of learning CSS Flexbox fun.
  • Progressive Difficulty
    The exercises start simple and increase in difficulty, progressively challenging users and helping them build their skills one step at a time.
  • Free to Use
    Flexbox Froggy is freely accessible, allowing anyone with internet access to learn Flexbox without any cost.
  • No Setup Required
    Users can start learning without any setup or installation, as Flexbox Froggy runs directly in a web browser.

Possible disadvantages of Flexbox Froggy

  • Limited Scope
    Flexbox Froggy focuses solely on Flexbox, which, while comprehensive within that topic, doesn't cover other important areas of CSS or web development.
  • Basic Styling Only
    The game restricts users to basic Flexbox layout tasks and doesn't incorporate more complex, real-world scenarios that involve combining Flexbox with other CSS properties.
  • No Customization
    Users can't modify the exercises or explore additional scenarios beyond what is provided, limiting opportunities for creative problem-solving.
  • Lack of Explanatory Content
    While interactive, the game provides minimal explanatory content or theory, which might not be sufficient for users who prefer detailed explanations of how Flexbox works.
  • No Offline Access
    Flexbox Froggy requires an internet connection, so users can't access the learning tool offline.

EJS features and specs

  • Simplicity
    EJS is easy to learn and use, especially for developers who are already familiar with JavaScript. The syntax is straightforward, making it a good choice for quick application development.
  • JavaScript Integration
    Since EJS templates are JavaScript files, you can seamlessly integrate JavaScript code, making it easy to manipulate data and use familiar JavaScript functions.
  • Lightweight
    EJS is a lightweight template engine, which makes it an optimal choice for applications where performance and simplicity are critical.
  • Flexibility
    Allows for the embedding of plain JavaScript within the templates, giving developers the flexibility to add logic directly in their HTML.
  • Partial Templates
    Supports partials, which help to reuse code snippets across different views, promoting DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principles.
  • Server-Side Rendering
    Supports server-side rendering, which can improve performance by reducing the amount of client-side processing needed.

Possible disadvantages of EJS

  • Limited Functionality
    Compared to more feature-rich template engines like Handlebars or Pug, EJS offers limited functionalities which might be a drawback for large, complex projects.
  • Debugging
    Debugging EJS templates can sometimes be challenging. Errors within templates can often be vague, making it difficult to trace the root cause.
  • Maintenance
    Embedding a lot of JavaScript within templates can make the code harder to read and maintain, especially as the complexity of the application grows.
  • Performance Overhead
    For very large and complex templates, EJS can introduce a performance overhead compared to more optimized template engines designed for high performance.
  • Community and Support
    While EJS has a reasonable user base, the community and support may not be as extensive as more popular alternatives like React or Vue.js.

Analysis of Flexbox Froggy

Overall verdict

  • Flexbox Froggy is highly regarded for its effectiveness in teaching Flexbox. It transforms learning into an enjoyable experience and is considered a valuable resource for both beginners and those wanting to refresh their skills.

Why this product is good

  • Flexbox Froggy is an interactive game that helps users learn CSS Flexbox by solving puzzles. The engaging and hands-on approach makes it easier to understand complex concepts through practical application. It effectively translates abstract technical details into intuitive tasks, which enhances retention and comprehension.

Recommended for

    This tool is recommended for web developers, designers, and students who are beginners in CSS and Flexbox or those who want a fun way to strengthen their understanding of these concepts.

Analysis of EJS

Overall verdict

  • Yes, EJS is considered good, particularly for projects where developers want ease of use and flexibility with JavaScript templating. It is lightweight, easy to learn, and integrates well with Express, a popular Node.js web application framework.

Why this product is good

  • EJS (Embedded JavaScript Templating) is popular because it provides a simple way to generate HTML markup with plain JavaScript. It allows for the embedding of JavaScript logic within your HTML templates, making it straightforward to use for those familiar with JavaScript. It's known for its efficiency in rendering templates and ease of integration with Node.js applications.

Recommended for

    EJS is recommended for developers building server-side web applications using Node.js and those looking for a simple, yet effective, templating solution. It is particularly suitable for small to medium-sized projects where dynamic content generation is needed and for teams that prioritize simplicity and performance.

Flexbox Froggy videos

🎥 CSS Flexbox Crash Course: Let's Play Flexbox Froggy (Complete all 24 Levels 🚀)

More videos:

  • Review - Flexbox Froggy
  • Review - FLEXBOX FROGGY: THE ULTIMATE WAY to learn CSS FlexBox. Reaction and Play-through (Level 1-24)

EJS videos

Kane Creek - Bestop Trail Review at EJS 2019

More videos:

  • Tutorial - JavaScript Templating Tutorial | Introduction To EJS

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Flexbox Froggy and EJS)
CSS Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
100% 100
Design Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Development
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Flexbox Froggy and EJS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Flexbox Froggy seems to be a lot more popular than EJS. While we know about 266 links to Flexbox Froggy, we've tracked only 26 mentions of EJS. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Flexbox Froggy mentions (266)

View more

EJS mentions (26)

  • Next.js vs Express: What to Choose in 2025?
    Express does not provide SEO benefits by default and would require additional configuration with tools like EJS (Embedded JavaScript) or Handlebars for server-side rendering. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Chapter 7: HTML part two
    For a more robust approach, we'd probably need to install a templating language of some kind, such as Twig, EJS, Handlebars, Pug or Mustache (this is not a complete list!). Reading the documentation for posthtml-modules, you'll notice it doesn't mention package.json or any of the approaches we've used in this guide. Instead, the examples are in JavaScript and we've advised to add this to our Node application. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Web Components and SSR - 2024 Edition
    Server-side Framework SSR is when you use a framework that runs the HTML templating logic entirely on the server to compose the HTML that will be rendered in the browser. These are frameworks like Ruby on Rails, ASP.Net, PHP, or even Node.js frameworks that use templating languages like Pug or EJS. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • How to Build an Application With Node.js
    We need a templating engine to render HTML code in the browser using Node.js. We'll use ejs (Embedded JavaScript) for this tutorial but there are others such as Pug (formerly known as Jade) and Express Handlebar, which also render HTML on the server. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • Getting to the meat and potatoes of serverless recipe parsing with Amazon Bedrock
    The tags is where you put the HTML you want Claude to read. The <%- document %> contained within is an ejs placeholder. More on this shortly. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Flexbox Froggy and EJS, you can also consider the following products

CSS Grid Garden - A game for learning CSS grid layout

Mustache.js - Minimal templating with {{mustaches}} in JavaScript - janl/mustache.js

CSS-Tricks - CSS-Tricks is a website about websites.

Handlebars - Handlebars is a JavaScript template library that is, more or less, based on ...

CSSBattle - Play against others in golf with your CSS skills

Vue.js - Reactive Components for Modern Web Interfaces