Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Flask VS Go-Fiber

Compare Flask VS Go-Fiber and see what are their differences

Flask logo Flask

a microframework for Python based on Werkzeug, Jinja 2 and good intentions.

Go-Fiber logo Go-Fiber

⚡️ Express inspired web framework written in Go. Contribute to gofiber/fiber development by creating an account on GitHub.
  • Flask Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-24
  • Go-Fiber Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-07

Flask features and specs

  • Simplicity
    Flask is a micro-framework, meaning it is lightweight, easy to understand, and simple to use. It requires minimal setup to get a web application up and running.
  • Flexibility
    Flask provides flexibility and control over the application's architecture, allowing developers to choose the components they need and avoid unnecessary bloat.
  • Extensibility
    Flask supports various extensions to add capabilities like database integration, form validation, and authentication without compromising its core simplicity.
  • Documentation
    Flask has comprehensive and well-organized documentation, making it easier for developers to learn and implement features effectively.
  • Community
    Flask has a large and active community, providing ample resources like tutorials, code snippets, and third-party libraries that can help speed up development.
  • Testing
    Flask is designed to be unit tested easily, allowing developers to test their applications and ensure reliability.

Possible disadvantages of Flask

  • Scalability
    Flask may not be as scalable as some other frameworks for very large applications due to its minimalist design and lack of built-in features.
  • Boilerplate Code
    Since Flask requires you to integrate and configure many components manually, codebases in Flask can sometimes contain a lot of boilerplate code.
  • Opinionated Architecture
    While Flask provides flexibility, it also means there are fewer conventions. Developers must make more architectural decisions, which can be challenging for large team collaboration.
  • Limited Tools
    Compared to more comprehensive frameworks, Flask offers fewer built-in tools and features, which may necessitate additional plugins or custom implementations.
  • Learning Curve for Complex Applications
    While Flask is easy to learn for simple applications, it can become complex to manage as the application grows, requiring a good understanding of design patterns and software architecture.

Go-Fiber features and specs

  • Performance
    Go-Fiber is built on top of Fasthttp, which is currently one of the fastest HTTP engines available for Go. This results in high performance and low latency for web applications.
  • Lightweight
    Go-Fiber is designed to be a minimalistic framework, offering just the essentials required for building web applications. This makes it lightweight and easy to deploy.
  • Familiar Syntax
    Fiber's API resembles Express.js, a popular Node.js framework, making it easier for developers familiar with Express to transition to Go-Fiber.
  • Middleware Support
    Go-Fiber supports various middleware capabilities, allowing developers to use predefined or custom middleware to handle requests efficiently.
  • WebSocket Support
    The framework includes built-in support for WebSockets, enabling real-time communication capabilities with minimal setup.
  • Scalability
    Go-Fiber takes advantage of Go's concurrency model, which allows for efficient handling of high loads and the ability to scale applications effectively.
  • Community and Ecosystem
    Go-Fiber has an active community that contributes to its growth and an expanding set of tools, plugins, and libraries to enhance development.

Possible disadvantages of Go-Fiber

  • Learning Curve
    While Go-Fiber aims to be simple, those unfamiliar with Go or coming from different programming backgrounds might face a learning curve adjusting to Go's conventions and paradigms.
  • Limited Features Compared to Other Frameworks
    Due to its focus on being lightweight, it may not have as many built-in features as some larger, more mature frameworks, requiring developers to implement additional functionalities or rely on third-party libraries.
  • Ecosystem Maturity
    As a relatively newer framework in the Go ecosystem, it might lack some of the extensive documentation, plugins, and resources available to more established frameworks.
  • Debugging and Error Handling
    Developers might find debugging and error handling less straightforward compared to other frameworks that offer more integrated development tools.
  • Less Enterprise Adoption
    Go-Fiber is still growing in popularity, and as such, it may not yet have widespread enterprise adoption, leading to less availability of enterprise-level support.

Analysis of Flask

Overall verdict

  • Flask is a good choice for developers looking for a lightweight and flexible framework for building web applications, particularly if they value simplicity and control over out-of-the-box features.

Why this product is good

  • Flask is a microframework for Python, offering simplicity and flexibility, making it a good choice for small to medium-sized applications.
  • It has a simple core with easy-to-add extensions, allowing developers to customize their applications as needed.
  • Flask's lightweight nature means it has a small overhead, leading to faster development cycles and easier debugging.
  • It has a strong community and excellent documentation, providing ample resources for learning and troubleshooting.

Recommended for

  • Developers who prefer Python and want a minimalist approach to web development.
  • Those working on small to medium-sized applications or microservices.
  • Developers who appreciate a modular and extensible architecture.
  • Teams that require rapid prototyping or quick deployment cycles.

Flask videos

Built To Last A Life Time - Ragproper Modern Glass Flask Review

More videos:

  • Review - The Hip Flask Guide - Gentleman's Gazette
  • Review - 10 Best Flasks 2019

Go-Fiber videos

No Go-Fiber videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Flask and Go-Fiber)
Developer Tools
96 96%
4% 4
Application And Data
0 0%
100% 100
Web Frameworks
92 92%
8% 8
Python Web Framework
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Flask and Go-Fiber. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Flask and Go-Fiber

Flask Reviews

The 20 Best Laravel Alternatives for Web Development
Flask is the micro that’s got your back without trying to run the show. It comes with the essentials but trusts you to pick your tools — no baggage attached, truly Pythonic at heart.
Top 9 best Frameworks for web development
The best frameworks for web development include React, Angular, Vue.js, Django, Spring, Laravel, Ruby on Rails, Flask and Express.js. Each of these frameworks has its own advantages and distinctive features, so it is important to choose the framework that best suits the needs of your project.
Source: www.kiwop.com
25 Python Frameworks to Master
You’ll also have access to some extension packages like Flask-RESTful, which adds support for building powerful REST APIs, and Flask-SQLAlchemy, a convenient way to use SQLAlchemy in your flask app.
Source: kinsta.com
3 Web Frameworks to Use With Python
Flask is a micro web framework for building web applications with Python. Here is the official web page of Flask.
Top 10 Phoenix Framework Alternatives
Flask is a micro-framework, i.e., it does not bundle tools and libraries and instead uses third party libraries to deliver functionalities.

Go-Fiber Reviews

We have no reviews of Go-Fiber yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Flask might be a bit more popular than Go-Fiber. We know about 42 links to it since March 2021 and only 29 links to Go-Fiber. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Flask mentions (42)

  • PSET 9 Finance - What is "disable response caching" and the function they ask to notice
    "After configuring Flask, notice how this file disables caching of responses (provided you’re in debugging mode, which you are by default in your code50 codespace), lest you make a change to some file but your browser not notice. ". Source: about 2 years ago
  • How to Send an Email in Python
    Flask, which offers a simple interface for email sending— Flask Mail. (Check here how to send emails with Flask). - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Plotting Bookmarks with Flask, Matplotlib, and OAuth 2.0
    Lang="en"> Plot Bookmarks!{% block title %}{% endblock %} rel="stylesheet" href="https://stackpath.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/4.2.1/css/bootstrap.min.css" /> class="container"> Plot Bookmarks by Date {% block containercontent %}{% endblock %} /> class="footer"> class="text-muted"> >This is a... - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
  • Determining what version of Flask is installed
    What's the easiest way to determine which version of Flask is installed? Source: about 3 years ago
  • What is the point of uWSGI?
    I'm looking at the WSGI specification and I'm trying to figure out how servers like uWSGI fit into the picture. I understand the point of the WSGI spec is to separate web servers like nginx from web applications like something you'd write using Flask. What I don't understand is what uWSGI is for. Why can't nginx directly call my Flask application? Can't flask speak WSGI directly to it? Why does uWSGI need to get... Source: about 3 years ago
View more

Go-Fiber mentions (29)

  • Deploying a Go Echo Application with Lambda Web Adapter, SAM, and Lambda Function URLs
    While researching, I found samples using Gin in the official AWS Lambda Web Adapter examples and a Zenn article with a Fiber sample. However, I couldn’t find any samples using Echo, so I decided to publish this article. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Local First HTMX Part 2
    I was initially using Go Fiber, because that is what the example app I was piggybacking off of used. It however does not compile when building for the browser. I tested out Gin and Echo. They both compiled and since my current project at work uses Echo I chose to use that here. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • Comparing Fiber vs. Gin for Go web development
    Go Fiber has a growing developer and user base. With over 31k stars on GitHub, you can tell that it’s constantly updated and maintained by a devoted team of contributors. You can also raise issues, ask questions, and participate freely thanks to the supportive community. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Ultimate Guide to User Authorization with Identity Platform
    To make my life easier, I added Fiber, a popular lightweight framework. Regardless of which package you use, the process and most of the code will remain unchanged. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • go for web backend
    There're similar things of course, for example there's https://github.com/gofiber/fiber a framework inspired by express. Source: almost 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Flask and Go-Fiber, you can also consider the following products

Django - The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines

Gin Gonic - Gin is a HTTP web framework written in Go (Golang). It features a Martini-like API with much better performance -- up to 40 times faster. If you need smashing performance, get yourself some Gin. - ...

Ruby on Rails - Ruby on Rails is an open source full-stack web application framework for the Ruby programming...

Buffalo Go Framework - A Go web development eco-system, designed to make your life easier.

Laravel - A PHP Framework For Web Artisans

FastAPI - FastAPI is an Open Source, modern, fast (high-performance), web framework for building APIs with Python 3.6+ based on standard Python type hints.