Software Alternatives & Reviews

FitNesse VS WebdriverIO

Compare FitNesse VS WebdriverIO and see what are their differences

FitNesse logo FitNesse

FitNesse is a fully integrated standalone wiki and acceptance testing framework.

WebdriverIO logo WebdriverIO

Webdriver module for Node.js. that makes it easier to write Selenium tests
  • FitNesse Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-01
  • WebdriverIO Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-19

FitNesse videos

No FitNesse videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

WebdriverIO videos

WebdriverIO Tutorial Series Review | #20

More videos:

  • Review - Test React Apps with WebdriverIO
  • Review - Get Started With WebdriverIO - WebdriverIO Wednesdays

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to FitNesse and WebdriverIO)
Automated Testing
25 25%
75% 75
Testing
24 24%
76% 76
Software Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Browser Testing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using FitNesse and WebdriverIO. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, FitNesse should be more popular than WebdriverIO. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

FitNesse mentions (3)

  • Is there a feasible preimage attack for any hash function today?
    (I notified the Martin and the FitNesse user mailing list about this back in 2010. I assume their threat model is that the default hash function is about the same as a closed office door - a request to stay out, or at least knock first - rather than a strong preventative measure.) "Uncle" Bob Martin's "FitNesse", see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FitNesse and http://fitnesse.org/ , uses its own hash function, at... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Why Gherkin (Cucumber, SpecFlow,…) Always Failed with UI Test Automation?
    Cucumber is not the first failed test framework that uses English-like syntax for automated testing (it may be for other uses, but definitely not real test automation). Do you still remember FitNesse (it was quite big about 10 years ago, an example here)? Now it is hardly mentioned. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • 10 Tips On How To Improve UI/UX Design of a Web Application
    In-house testing tools help you to differentiate what people say and what they actually do with a product by testing it. FitNesse and Bugwolf are pretty good at this. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

WebdriverIO mentions (2)

  • Node.js Packages and Resources
    WebdriverIO - Automated testing based on the WebDriver protocol. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Cross Browser Testing With WebDriverIO
    The WebDriverIO project is available on GitHub and the overall statistics speak a lot about the popularity of this JavaScript framework. It has more than 6.7K stars and the project has been forked around 1.9K times. As of writing this blog, the latest version of the WebDriverIO JavaScript framework is 7.7.2. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing FitNesse and WebdriverIO, you can also consider the following products

Cucumber - Cucumber is a BDD tool for specification of application features and user scenarios in plain text.

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

Robot framework - Robot Framework is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance...

Jasmine - Behavior-Driven JavaScript

JUnit - JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests.

Cypress.io - Slow, difficult and unreliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Install Cypress in seconds and take the pain out of front-end testing.