Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

FitNesse VS Testcontainers

Compare FitNesse VS Testcontainers and see what are their differences

FitNesse logo FitNesse

FitNesse is a fully integrated standalone wiki and acceptance testing framework.

Testcontainers logo Testcontainers

Testcontainers is a modern Java library that comes with the exclusive support of Junit tests.
  • FitNesse Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-01
  • Testcontainers Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-07

FitNesse videos

No FitNesse videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Testcontainers videos

Testcontainers – From Zero to Hero

More videos:

  • Review - Testcontainers: a Year-in-review (Kevin Wittek)
  • Review - Testcontainers: a Year-in-review (Kevin Wittek)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to FitNesse and Testcontainers)
Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Online Services
0 0%
100% 100
Automated Testing
42 42%
58% 58
Software Testing
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using FitNesse and Testcontainers. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Testcontainers should be more popular than FitNesse. It has been mentiond 16 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

FitNesse mentions (3)

  • Is there a feasible preimage attack for any hash function today?
    (I notified the Martin and the FitNesse user mailing list about this back in 2010. I assume their threat model is that the default hash function is about the same as a closed office door - a request to stay out, or at least knock first - rather than a strong preventative measure.) "Uncle" Bob Martin's "FitNesse", see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FitNesse and http://fitnesse.org/ , uses its own hash function, at... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Why Gherkin (Cucumber, SpecFlow,…) Always Failed with UI Test Automation?
    Cucumber is not the first failed test framework that uses English-like syntax for automated testing (it may be for other uses, but definitely not real test automation). Do you still remember FitNesse (it was quite big about 10 years ago, an example here)? Now it is hardly mentioned. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • 10 Tips On How To Improve UI/UX Design of a Web Application
    In-house testing tools help you to differentiate what people say and what they actually do with a product by testing it. FitNesse and Bugwolf are pretty good at this. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

Testcontainers mentions (16)

  • SpringAI, llama3 and pgvector: bRAGging rights!
    To support the exploration, I've developed a simple Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) workflow that works completely locally on the laptop for free. If you're interested, you can find the code itself here. Basically, I've used Testcontainers to create a Postgres database container with the pgvector extension to store text embeddings and an open source LLM with which I send requests to: Meta's llama3 through... - Source: dev.to / 1 day ago
  • Revolutionize Your Unit Testing with Testcontainers and Docker
    Testcontainers is a very neat open source framework/project I just discovered. It enables developers to create unit tests using throwaway, lightweight instances of e.g. a database running in Docker containers. - Source: dev.to / 16 days ago
  • How Enabling Slow Query Log Enhances Postgres Observability
    However, if you run PostgreSQL only for a very short period, for instance during your automated tests, then you may have no technical way of reconfiguring it. This may be the case with Testcontainers. Typically, you may run some initialization code just before your actual test suite to initialize the dependencies like storage emulators or database servers. Testcontainers takes care of running them as Docker... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • General Availability of .NET Aspire: Simplifying .NET Cloud-Native Development
    Infrastructure as code in C# is already supported by Pulumi[1]. However, developing anything significant requires a lot of copying values from one part of the stack to another, lots of magic strings and lots of combinations of parameters that don't work. Plus sometimes you choose a combination of parameters that works until your cloud provider upgrades Kubernetes or whatever and now that specific version of k8s... - Source: Hacker News / 26 days ago
  • Spring Tests with TestContainers
    You can read more about TestContainers in the official documentation. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing FitNesse and Testcontainers, you can also consider the following products

Cucumber - Cucumber is a BDD tool for specification of application features and user scenarios in plain text.

Arquillian - Arquillian is an open-source testing platform that offers no more container lifecycle, deployment hassles, and mocks.

Robot framework - Robot Framework is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance...

JUnit - JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests.

RSpec - RSpec is a testing tool for the Ruby programming language born under the banner of Behavior-Driven Development featuring a rich command line program, textual descriptions of examples, and more.

Qacoverage - Test Case Management Tools