Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

FitNesse VS Serverspec

Compare FitNesse VS Serverspec and see what are their differences

FitNesse logo FitNesse

FitNesse is a fully integrated standalone wiki and acceptance testing framework.

Serverspec logo Serverspec

Serverspec.github.com :
  • FitNesse Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-01
  • Serverspec Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-02-21

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to FitNesse and Serverspec)
Testing
60 60%
40% 40
Automated Testing
57 57%
43% 43
Software Testing
100 100%
0% 0
DevOps Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using FitNesse and Serverspec. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, FitNesse should be more popular than Serverspec. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

FitNesse mentions (3)

  • Is there a feasible preimage attack for any hash function today?
    (I notified the Martin and the FitNesse user mailing list about this back in 2010. I assume their threat model is that the default hash function is about the same as a closed office door - a request to stay out, or at least knock first - rather than a strong preventative measure.) "Uncle" Bob Martin's "FitNesse", see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FitNesse and http://fitnesse.org/ , uses its own hash function, at... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Why Gherkin (Cucumber, SpecFlow,…) Always Failed with UI Test Automation?
    Cucumber is not the first failed test framework that uses English-like syntax for automated testing (it may be for other uses, but definitely not real test automation). Do you still remember FitNesse (it was quite big about 10 years ago, an example here)? Now it is hardly mentioned. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • 10 Tips On How To Improve UI/UX Design of a Web Application
    In-house testing tools help you to differentiate what people say and what they actually do with a product by testing it. FitNesse and Bugwolf are pretty good at this. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

Serverspec mentions (1)

  • Unit test for an installer
    I worry that using two different testing frameworks will result in unbalanced coverage: consider using a BDD testing framework that can be applied to both Linux and Windows hosts, maybe serverspec would have some of the pieces you need? Source: almost 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing FitNesse and Serverspec, you can also consider the following products

Cucumber - Cucumber is a BDD tool for specification of application features and user scenarios in plain text.

RSpec - RSpec is a testing tool for the Ruby programming language born under the banner of Behavior-Driven Development featuring a rich command line program, textual descriptions of examples, and more.

Robot framework - Robot Framework is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance...

JUnit - JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests.

Qacoverage - Test Case Management Tools

Capybara - Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app.