Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

FireCMS VS localhost.run

Compare FireCMS VS localhost.run and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

FireCMS logo FireCMS

An open source CMS/admin panel based on Firestore

localhost.run logo localhost.run

Instantly share your localhost environment!
  • FireCMS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-01
  • localhost.run Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-24

FireCMS features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    FireCMS offers an intuitive and clean user interface that simplifies content management tasks for users with varying levels of technical expertise.
  • Firebase Integration
    Built natively on Firebase, FireCMS allows seamless integration with Firebase features such as authentication, Firestore, and storage, making it an excellent choice for Firebase-centric applications.
  • Real-Time Capabilities
    FireCMS leverages Firebase's real-time capabilities, ensuring that updates to content are immediately reflected across all users and sessions.
  • Customization and Extensibility
    Developers can customize the platform to suit specific business needs through custom form fields, views, and actions.
  • Open-Source
    Being open-source, FireCMS can be freely modified and tailored to fit specific project requirements, and benefits from community contributions.

Possible disadvantages of FireCMS

  • Firebase Dependency
    FireCMS is deeply integrated with Firebase, which may be a limitation for projects not already using Firebase, or for those looking for database-agnostic solutions.
  • Learning Curve for Customization
    While customization is a strength, it also presents a learning curve for developers unfamiliar with React or Firebase.
  • Scalability Concerns
    Depending on the usage and growing data within Firestore, scaling might present challenges requiring careful planning and cost management.
  • Limited Feature Set Compared to Enterprise Solutions
    FireCMS might lack some advanced enterprise-level features provided by more mature CMS platforms, such as detailed analytics or workflow automation.

localhost.run features and specs

  • Simplicity
    Localhost.run provides a simple way to expose your local server to the internet without requiring complex configurations or additional software installations.
  • No Installation Required
    You can use localhost.run directly from your terminal without the need to install any software or dependencies.
  • Free and Instantaneous
    Localhost.run offers a free service, and you can quickly start tunneling without any wait times or sign-ups.
  • Wide Compatibility
    It works with any web server running on your local machine, making it highly versatile.

Possible disadvantages of localhost.run

  • Stability and Uptime
    As a free service, localhost.run may not be as reliable as paid alternatives, potentially leading to unexpected downtimes.
  • Limited Customization
    Localhost.run doesn't offer many advanced features or customizations, which may be a drawback for more complex use cases.
  • Security
    By exposing your local server to the internet, there could be potential security risks if your server is not properly configured or secured.
  • Performance
    The performance of the tunnel can be slower compared to running the server locally due to additional network hops and bandwidth limitations.

Analysis of localhost.run

Overall verdict

  • Localhost.run is a good tool for developers who need a fast, efficient, and secure way to share their local development environments. Its ease of use and minimal setup make it an excellent choice for quick sharing and testing scenarios.

Why this product is good

  • Localhost.run is a service that provides a quick and easy way to expose a local server to the internet. It is often praised for its simplicity, ease of use, and minimal setup requirements. It allows developers to share their work quickly for collaboration, testing, or demonstration purposes without needing to deploy to a public server. It uses a secure SSH tunnel, which adds a layer of security to the service.

Recommended for

  • Developers who need to demo their work to clients or teams
  • Collaborative programming and real-time feedback
  • Testing webhooks or APIs from an external source
  • Temporary exposure of local servers for testing purposes

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to FireCMS and localhost.run)
Productivity
100 100%
0% 0
Localhost Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Testing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using FireCMS and localhost.run. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare FireCMS and localhost.run

FireCMS Reviews

  1. Fernando Lopez
    · CTO at medicalmotion GmbH ·
    Best Firebase CMS

    Managed to get a back office tool for our new project in very little time. Ton of integrated fields and easy to extend

    🏁 Competitors: Rowy
    👍 Pros:    Easy to use|Great ux|Firebase as a backend|Highly customizable|Free for commercial use
    👎 Cons:    Requires some development knowledge

localhost.run Reviews

Tunnelling services for exposing localhost to the web
localhost.run is very similar to Serveo but with less features. In fact, as far as I can tell, it only does 1 thing: expose your local web server to the web with a public URL. And it does that well enough for me.
Source: chenhuijing.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, localhost.run should be more popular than FireCMS. It has been mentiond 42 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

FireCMS mentions (16)

  • FireCMS Flavours in the CLI
    That's it! You are ready to go. You can now start building your project with FireCMS. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Firebase: The Ultimate Backend for Your CMS
    In the rapidly evolving landscape of content management systems (CMS), choosing the right backend is more critical than ever. Developers are faced with a plethora of options, from traditional setups like WordPress to modern headless CMSs like Strapi, Contentful, and Sanity. At FireCMS, we've embraced Firebase as the backbone of our CMS, and in this article, we'll delve into the benefits of using Firebase over... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Fire CMS, CMS based on Firebase 🚀
    FireCMS is a free, open-source headless CMS based on Firebase, that both developers and content manager will love 🚀 #firebase #cms #content. Source: about 2 years ago
  • What's the best CMS to start with if you're already a programmer?
    Been looking into fireCms.co an extendable gui for interacting with firebase Firestone and storage . Source: over 2 years ago
  • Any suggestions for an off-the-self UI for firestore.
    I like FireCMS. It requires a little bit of customization but it's very flexible. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

localhost.run mentions (42)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing FireCMS and localhost.run, you can also consider the following products

Blur Admin - Angular admin panel front-end framework

ngrok - ngrok enables secure introspectable tunnels to localhost webhook development tool and debugging tool.

Tabler - Admin panel made simple

Portmap.io - Expose your local PC to Internet from behind firewall and without real IP address

Forest Admin - Execute fast and at scale with no time wasted on internal tools developed in-house.

sish - An open source serveo/ngrok alternative. HTTP(S)/WS(S)/TCP Tunnels to localhost using only SSH.