Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
CSI

fio VS Cold-cache Sequential I/O Benchmark

Compare fio VS Cold-cache Sequential I/O Benchmark and see what are their differences

NinjaOne
NinjaOne (Formerly NinjaRMM) provides remote monitoring and management software that combines powerful functionality with a fast, modern UI. Easily remediate IT issues, automate common tasks, and support end-users with powerful IT management tools. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

fio logo fio

Generate I/O for benchmarking, stress testing, verification or workload reproduction purposes.

Cold-cache Sequential I/O Benchmark logo Cold-cache Sequential I/O Benchmark

Cold-cache Sequential IO Benchmark
  • fio Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-15
  • Cold-cache Sequential I/O Benchmark Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-05-16

fio features and specs

  • Highly Flexible
    Fio is highly configurable, allowing users to simulate various types of workloads with detailed parameters. This flexibility makes it suitable for a wide range of performance testing scenarios, including block devices, files, and networked filesystems.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    Fio is designed to work on multiple operating systems, including Linux, Windows, and macOS. This cross-platform support enhances its usability in diverse environments and facilitates testing across different systems.
  • Rich Feature Set
    Fio supports a multitude of I/O engines, including sync, mmap, libaio, posixaio, and others. Additionally, it allows for dynamic generation of patterns, scripting via functions, and varied reporting formats, which are ideal for comprehensive performance analysis.
  • Active Development and Support
    Being an open-source tool with a large community, fio receives regular updates and improvements from contributors, ensuring that it remains robust and relevant for modern testing needs.
  • Detailed Reporting
    Fio provides detailed and customizable output formats, such as JSON and normal text, which help users analyze performance metrics in depth and facilitate easy integration into performance testing workflows.

Possible disadvantages of fio

  • Complexity for Beginners
    The extensive configuration options, while powerful, can be overwhelming for new users. It may take time and effort to learn how to effectively use fio and interpret its results without prior experience in performance testing.
  • Limited GUI Support
    Fio primarily operates from the command line, lacking a native graphical user interface (GUI). This can limit its accessibility for users who prefer visual tools and may require additional tooling or scripts for enhanced usability.
  • Resource-Intensive
    Running fio with complex workloads or on large-scale systems can be resource-intensive, potentially affecting other processes on the test system. Users need to ensure that appropriate resources are available to avoid skewed test results.
  • Steep Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    For users seeking to employ advanced features like custom scripting or network testing, understanding the full scope of fio's capabilities and configuration syntax can be challenging without comprehensive documentation or community support.

Cold-cache Sequential I/O Benchmark features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

fio videos

+ Add

MAZAYA CHAMBRA FIO | Review [+18]

More videos:

  • Review - Como escolher minhas tesouras (Fio, Tamanho e material) - REVIEW #15
  • Review - Os MELHORES fones sem fio de 2020? (Review)

Cold-cache Sequential I/O Benchmark videos

No Cold-cache Sequential I/O Benchmark videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to fio and Cold-cache Sequential I/O Benchmark)

fio

Cold-cache Sequential I/O Benchmark

Monitoring Tools
87 87%
Monitoring Tools
13% 13
Hard Drive Tools
85 85%
Hard Drive Tools
15% 15
Utilities
85 85%
Utilities
15% 15
Web Service Automation
65 65%
Web Service Automation
35% 35

User comments

Share your experience with using fio and Cold-cache Sequential I/O Benchmark. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, fio should be more popular than Cold-cache Sequential I/O Benchmark. It has been mentiond 14 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

fio mentions (14)

  • Dire SMB speed with on PC to NAS
    Assuming two systems use flash storage, network bandwidth is identical and it is configured the same way, there should be an issue within the PC, either system or storage drive. Check the system logs for errors and warning events related to data transfer from/to NAS. Try to benchmark the PCs' disks using fio to confirm they have similar performance. https://github.com/axboe/fio. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: What are some good resources for learning about low level disk/file IO?
    Not specifically addressing your question, but when you get to the point of wanting to start doing some experiments you may find that 'fio' [1] is very handy. [1] https://github.com/axboe/fio. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • KVM virtual machines on ZFS benchmarks
    The dd is not a good benchmarking tool, you should use something like fio and probably tune it to use the ioengine most similar to your use case (eg. a database server will probably use some async IO interface). In your first example (with bs=1G) probably something (the guest OS, the qemu/kvm or the host OS) have split into smaller chunks anyway. Source: about 2 years ago
  • SSD Sequential Write Slowdowns
    All linux tests are run with fio 3.32 (github) with future commit 03900b0bf8af625bb43b10f0627b3c5947c3ff79 manually applied. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Just write the f*****g parser.
    Agree, I used flex/yacc to add an arithmetic expression evaluator to fio a few years back to allow simple math with some units in fio's job files, and for stuff like that, they're fine, but I wouldn't want to use them for a real language, the error handling is kind of a nightmare. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

Cold-cache Sequential I/O Benchmark mentions (2)

  • Ask HN: What are some tools / libraries you built yourself?
    Https://nullboard.io/preview - a kanban https://iobureau.com/ugiffer - a screencap tool https://ccsiobench.com - a storage IO profiler https://diskovery.io - a storage stack/device explorer https://github.com/apankrat/dnswhisperer - a DNS-based adblocker Plus a bunch of commercial software, but all of these ^ are basically to scratch my own itch. - Source: Hacker News / almost 4 years ago
  • copying 4 million files
    From my experience, your remark is wildly off the mark. In particular, I wrote a benchmarking tool that measures this sort of thing and I've generally been dealing with IO performance tuning for a while now. Source: about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing fio and Cold-cache Sequential I/O Benchmark, you can also consider the following products

CrystalMark - CrystalMark is a full included benchmark application that can be utilized for surveying the execution and capacities of a PC.

Blackmagic Disk Speed Test - Blackmagic Disk Speed Test is a tool that allows users to quickly measure disk performance while working on it.

Iometer - As the Iometer Users Guide says, Iometer is an I/O subsystem measurement and characterization tool...

HD Tune - HD Tune Pro is a hard disk / SSD utility with many functions. It can be used to measure the drive's performance, scan for errors, check the health status (S. M. A. R.

Diskspd - A Robust Storage Testing Tool (superseding SQLIO)

CrystalDiskInfo - CrystalDiskInfo. A HDD/SSD utility software which supports a part of USB connection and Intel RAID. >> Download. Intel RAID (IRST). IRST 11.

Loading...