Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

FindBugs VS Meson

Compare FindBugs VS Meson and see what are their differences

FindBugs logo FindBugs

Findbugs is a tool that looks for bugs in Java code. Findbugs finds the bugs by analyzing computer software without actually executing programs. Using this software allows for easy debugging and repairing broken script. Read more about FindBugs.

Meson logo Meson

Meson is an open source build system meant to be both extremely fast, and, even more importantly...
  • FindBugs Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-01-11
  • Meson Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-03-04

FindBugs videos

Static Code Analysis With FindBugs: Step By Step Tutorial

Meson videos

Meson RTA by Newgen Vape - Flavour Banger - Review & Rebuild

More videos:

  • Tutorial - MESON RTA by NEWGEN - Review & Build Tutorial!
  • Review - NewGen Vape Meson RTA Review - ...it's all down to the price...

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to FindBugs and Meson)
Code Coverage
100 100%
0% 0
Front End Package Manager
Code Analysis
100 100%
0% 0
JS Build Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using FindBugs and Meson. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare FindBugs and Meson

FindBugs Reviews

TOP 40 Static Code Analysis Tools (Best Source Code Analysis Tools)
A tool that helps in analyzing C/C++, Java, C#, RPG and Python codes. Another good thing about this tool is it allows integration with free static checker tools like cppcheck, PMD, FindBugs. Basic Version of this tool is free but it comes with fewer features. Based on the need, you can decide whether the free version satisfies the requirement or not.

Meson Reviews

We have no reviews of Meson yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Meson seems to be a lot more popular than FindBugs. While we know about 43 links to Meson, we've tracked only 3 mentions of FindBugs. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

FindBugs mentions (3)

  • Scanning for flaws?
    The tools generally depend on the programming language. You might be looking for something like a "linter" or static analyzer (i.e. FindBugs for Java). Source: over 2 years ago
  • Why we need multiple code analysis tools?
    These tools perform analysis on the application's source code without executing/running the code on a platform. In other words, a bot goes line by line of source code to find any bug defined by preconfigured policies/rules. It could be compared to manual code review, but the review is done by a bot. Mostly, code quality, coding standard aspects are targeted to be scanned. The biggest name in static code analysis... - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
  • Review of Java Static Analysis Tools
    FindBugs looks for bugs in Java Code, and this means over 400 different bugs. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago

Meson mentions (43)

  • Rust Without Crates.io
    I went to mesonbuild.org and it doesn't match the description (some sort of betting site? I didn't stick around ...), and a search turned up: https://mesonbuild.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Makefile Tutorial
    Came here to post the same. The answer for How to build software? is Meson[1] for C and C++ and also other languages. Works well on Windows and Mac, too. I’ve written a small Makefile to learn the basic and backgrounds. Make is fine. But the next high-level would have been Autotools, which is an intimidating and weird set of tools. Most new stuff written in C/C++ use now Meson and it feels sane. [1]... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • CMake x make?
    If you are very fortunate, you'll be able to choose something else. I like meson myself: it looks a bit like python, it's popular, small, simple, well-documented, easy to install and update, and it works well everywhere. Source: 9 months ago
  • C++ Papercuts
    I suggest changing the build tool. Meson improved C and C++ a lot: https://mesonbuild.com/ The dependency declaration and auto-detection is nice. But the hidden extra is WrapDB, built-in package management (if wanted):
        https://mesonbuild.com/Wrap-dependency-system-manual.html.
    - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • A Modern C Development Environment
    > C's only REAL problem (in my opinion) which is the lack of dependency management. Most everything else can be done with a makefile and a half decent editor. Care to hear about our lord and saviour Meson? Both of your quoted problems are mutually incompatible: dependency management isn't the job of the compiler, it's a job for the build or host system. If you want to keep writing makefiles, be prepared to write... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing FindBugs and Meson, you can also consider the following products

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

Ninja Build - Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.

Pmd - PMD scans Java source code and looks for potential problems like:

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.

CMake - CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.