Software Alternatives & Reviews

FindBugs for IntelliJ IDEA VS Kite

Compare FindBugs for IntelliJ IDEA VS Kite and see what are their differences

FindBugs for IntelliJ IDEA logo FindBugs for IntelliJ IDEA

FindBugs for IntelliJ IDEA provides static byte code analysis to look for bugs in Java code from within IntelliJ IDEA.

Kite logo Kite

Kite helps you write code faster by bringing the web's programming knowledge into your editor.
  • FindBugs for IntelliJ IDEA Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-01
  • Kite Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-10

FindBugs for IntelliJ IDEA videos

No FindBugs for IntelliJ IDEA videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Kite videos

Ozone Alpha V1 2019 kite review

More videos:

  • Tutorial - Kitesurfing - How to Choose The Right North Kiteboarding Kite - REVIEW
  • Review - 2019 Slingshot RPM | REAL Kite Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to FindBugs for IntelliJ IDEA and Kite)
Software Development
12 12%
88% 88
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
IDE
14 14%
86% 86
Programming
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using FindBugs for IntelliJ IDEA and Kite. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare FindBugs for IntelliJ IDEA and Kite

FindBugs for IntelliJ IDEA Reviews

We have no reviews of FindBugs for IntelliJ IDEA yet.
Be the first one to post

Kite Reviews

Top 10 GitHub Copilot Alternatives
Code more quickly. Maintain your flow. Kite empowers developers by integrating AI-powered code completions into their code editor. The kite can be installed to offer AI-powered code completions to all of your code editors.
Source: hashdork.com
Top 9 GitHub Copilot alternatives to try in 2022 (free and paid)
The last solution in our list is worthy of mention because it is one of the more flexible and user-friendly solutions offered for free. Unfortunately, at the time of writing, Kite is unavailable for download and is not maintained.
Source: www.tabnine.com
Tabnine vs Kite 2021: best AI-Powered Auto-Completion tool?
Kite saves the memory f your computer which means it uses very little memory. If we compare the memory usage analysis of both Kite and TabNine we will come to know that TabNine requires almost 4Gb memory for a project of 10-line code. Whereas kite uses only 550 Mb memory for the same project. It implies that Kite uses almost 85% less memory.
Source: ssiddique.info
I tested all intelligent IDEs (2019 edition)
Until now, suggestions were based on the classes/methods referenced in your code but without taking into account the actual usage of those in the code. Latest versions improve this behavior by providing a new type Line-of-Code completions that incorporate context from code you’ve previously written to power smart completions up to a full line of code. Kite claims this...

What are some alternatives?

When comparing FindBugs for IntelliJ IDEA and Kite, you can also consider the following products

Squaretest - The Squaretest plugin for IntelliJ IDEA allows you to automatically generate the boilerplate code required for your Java unit tests.

TabNine - TabNine is the all-language autocompleter. We use deep learning to help you write code faster.

IdeaVim - IdeaVim is a Vim emulation plugin for IDEs based on the IntelliJ platform.

GitHub Copilot - Your AI pair programmer. With GitHub Copilot, get suggestions for whole lines or entire functions right inside your editor.

Maven Helper - Maven Helper is a build-helper-maven-plugin.

Visual Studio IntelliCode - Visual Studio IntelliCode is an experimental set of AI-assisted development capabilities for next-generation developer productivity.