Filmulator VS digiKam

Filmulator Reviews

digiKam Reviews

Filmulator mentions (6)

• Make Your Renders Unnecessarily Complicated by Modeling a Film Camera in Blender [video]

  I'd also (re-)add: film is just one part of a transmission process. Film has to be developed into something. And that's a chemical process, which is non-linear. Developer, the bath you put film in to activate the still blank but exposed reel, to turn the grains into actual "developed" photo, is a complex analog process. "Developer" is expended while developing film & becomes less effective at developing, creating... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago

• Show HN: Filmbox, physically accurate film emulation, now on Linux and Windows

  How does this compare to my Filmulator, which basically runs a simulation of stand development? https://filmulator.org (I've been too busy on another project to dedicate too much time to it the past year, and dealing with Windows CI sucks the fun out of everything, so it hasn't been updated in a while…). - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

• Film Photography is Still a Great Option.

  She's Got The Look! Many people spend so much time trying to make their digital photos look like film (and massive props to /u/CarVac for his development of Filmulator because it's awesome), but with film that's effortless and automatic. Want to make your photos look like they were shot on Ektar? Use Ektar. Portra? Use Portra. And Velvia, and Provia and Cinestill, and so on. Source: over 1 year ago

• Darktable 4.0.0 Released

  > I don't want to do elaborate stuff like working with masks / applying filters to sections of the photo only. Only thing I usually do is increase saturation, and, rarely, brightness/aperture. I don't think you're the intended audience for darktable. Try https://filmulator.org/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

• What is the best non-subscription photo editor?

  There's a list in the FAQ. I try to stick to free and open-source software. Darktable, RawTherapee, and Filmulator have varying levels of complexity. Source: over 2 years ago

digiKam mentions (9)

• How to tag and store pictures downloaded from the internet?

  Digikam seems ideal for this https://digikam.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago

• What are your favorite methodologies for organizing digital life

  I have all of my photos (with the exception of smartphone photos... ugh) in a nicely constructed set of folders \photos\yyyy\yyyymmmdd\ then the folder made by the camera, etc. I've got a small python script to generate the folders. I use Digikam[1] to do facial recognition and tagging on them. It's finally gotten to the point where it doesn't crash all the time writing metadata, and the facial recognition is... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago

• are there any free self-hosted DAMs like Adobe Experience Manager [AEM]?

  I use digikam for my own personal library. I’m not sure if it’s able to be run from a server, but I know you can hook up a NAS to it to manage it. Can tag photos, rank, organize, etc. Source: about 1 year ago

• Looking for a simple Photo manager/DAM for not photos advice?

  Check out digiKam. It has photo editing tools as well, but the main focus is photo management. Also it is free and open source. Source: about 2 years ago

• Looking for a way to tag my photo collection with keywords

  But with that many photos, I'd suggest a more fully featured digital asset management (DAM) program. Lightroom (paid), DigiKam, or DarkTable (both free) are good choices. PhoTool's IMatch (paid) also uses exiftool and is extremely powerful with regards to metadata. Source: about 2 years ago