Filmulator VS ACDSee Photo Studio

Filmulator

A simple raw photo editor based on the process of developing film.

ACDSee Photo Studio

ACDSee becomes ACDSee Photo Studio — ACDSee Photo Studio Standard 2018 continues the ACDSee legacy

Landing page //
2021-10-09

Landing page //
2023-07-25

Filmulator cropping work-in-progress demo

ACDSee Photo Studio videos

+ Add

My Lightroom & Photoshop Alternative | Acdsee Photo Studio Ultimate 2018

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Filmulator and ACDSee Photo Studio)

ACDSee Photo Studio

Graphic Design Software

100 100%

Graphic Design Software

0% 0

Photos & Graphics

18 18%

Photos & Graphics

82% 82

Image Editing

29 29%

Image Editing

71% 71

Photo Editing

0 0%

Photo Editing

100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Filmulator and ACDSee Photo Studio. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Filmulator and ACDSee Photo Studio

Filmulator Reviews

We have no reviews of Filmulator yet.
Be the first one to post

ACDSee Photo Studio Reviews

The best photo organizing software in 2022

Photos can be imported to ACDSee Photo Studio Pro but files already stored on your storage device can also be accessed via the software (unlike Lightroom Classic which requires import before organizing). Flagship features also include facial recognition and detection, batch renaming, keyword list imports, and customizable keyboard shortcuts to make it quicker to find what...

Source: www.digitalcameraworld.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Filmulator seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 6 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Filmulator mentions (6)

Make Your Renders Unnecessarily Complicated by Modeling a Film Camera in Blender [video]
I'd also (re-)add: film is just one part of a transmission process. Film has to be developed into something. And that's a chemical process, which is non-linear. Developer, the bath you put film in to activate the still blank but exposed reel, to turn the grains into actual "developed" photo, is a complex analog process. "Developer" is expended while developing film & becomes less effective at developing, creating... - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
Show HN: Filmbox, physically accurate film emulation, now on Linux and Windows
How does this compare to my Filmulator, which basically runs a simulation of stand development? https://filmulator.org (I've been too busy on another project to dedicate too much time to it the past year, and dealing with Windows CI sucks the fun out of everything, so it hasn't been updated in a while…). - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Film Photography is Still a Great Option.
She's Got The Look! Many people spend so much time trying to make their digital photos look like film (and massive props to /u/CarVac for his development of Filmulator because it's awesome), but with film that's effortless and automatic. Want to make your photos look like they were shot on Ektar? Use Ektar. Portra? Use Portra. And Velvia, and Provia and Cinestill, and so on. Source: over 1 year ago
Darktable 4.0.0 Released
> I don't want to do elaborate stuff like working with masks / applying filters to sections of the photo only. Only thing I usually do is increase saturation, and, rarely, brightness/aperture. I don't think you're the intended audience for darktable. Try https://filmulator.org/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
What is the best non-subscription photo editor?
There's a list in the FAQ. I try to stick to free and open-source software. Darktable, RawTherapee, and Filmulator have varying levels of complexity. Source: over 2 years ago