Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

FileRun VS MongoDB

Compare FileRun VS MongoDB and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

FileRun logo FileRun

Beautiful, fast and reliable selfhosted file sharing and sync.

MongoDB logo MongoDB

MongoDB (from "humongous") is a scalable, high-performance NoSQL database.
  • FileRun Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-16

Alternative to Google Drive/Dropbox/Box.com/Nextcloud.

  • MongoDB Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-21

FileRun

$ Details
freemium €18.0 / Monthly (10 Users Enterprise Version License)
Release Date
2007 January

FileRun features and specs

  • User-friendly Interface
    FileRun offers a clean and intuitive user interface that makes it easy for users to navigate, manage, and share files without a steep learning curve.
  • Integration with Google Drive/Photos
    FileRun supports seamless integration with Google Drive and Google Photos, enabling users to synchronize and manage files between these cloud services and FileRun.
  • Extensive File Previews
    The platform provides comprehensive file preview options for various file types, including documents, images, audio, and video files, allowing users to view their content without needing to download it first.
  • Customizable
    FileRun is highly customizable, providing options for users to tailor the application to their specific needs, including themes, layout configurations, and functionality extensions.
  • Self-Hosted
    As a self-hosted solution, FileRun offers greater control over data privacy and security, as all data is stored on the user's own server or chosen hosting provider.
  • Collaboration Features
    FileRun includes various collaboration functionalities such as file sharing, version control, and real-time notifications, making team collaboration more efficient.

Possible disadvantages of FileRun

  • Requires Server Setup
    Being a self-hosted solution, FileRun necessitates technical knowledge to set up and maintain the server, which might be challenging for non-technical users.
  • Cost for Extended Features
    While FileRun offers a basic free version, some advanced features require a paid license, which can be a cost consideration for users looking for free file management solutions.
  • Limited Mobile App Support
    FileRun currently does not offer native mobile applications, which may limit the user experience and functionality when accessing files on mobile devices.
  • Dependence on Third-party Tools for Advanced Features
    Certain advanced functionalities, such as full-text search and previewing specific file types, depend on third-party tools and plugins, adding to the complexity and potential cost.
  • Performance Dependent on Hosting
    The performance and speed of FileRun are heavily dependent on the quality of the hosting environment. Poor hosting can lead to slower file access and reduced reliability.
  • Limited Support and Documentation
    Users might find the available support and documentation to be less comprehensive compared to larger, more established file management systems, potentially leading to difficulties in troubleshooting issues.

MongoDB features and specs

  • Scalability
    MongoDB offers horizontal scaling through sharding, allowing it to handle large volumes of data and enabling distributed computing.
  • Flexible Schema
    It allows for a flexible schema design using BSON (Binary JSON), making it easier to iterate and change application data models.
  • High Performance
    MongoDB is optimized for read and write throughput, making it suitable for real-time applications.
  • Rich Query Language
    Supports a rich and expressive query language that allows for efficient querying and analytics.
  • Built-in Replication
    Provides robust replication mechanisms for high availability and redundancy.
  • Geospatial Indexing
    Offers powerful geospatial indexing capabilities, useful for location-based applications.
  • Aggregation Framework
    Enables complex data manipulations and transformations using the aggregation pipeline framework.
  • Cross-Platform
    Works on multiple operating systems, enhancing its versatility and deployment options.

Possible disadvantages of MongoDB

  • Memory Usage
    MongoDB can consume a large amount of memory due to its use of memory-mapped files, which may be a concern for some applications.
  • Complex Transactions
    While MongoDB supports ACID transactions, they can be more complex to implement and less efficient compared to traditional relational databases.
  • Data Redundancy
    The flexible schema design can lead to data redundancy and increased storage costs if not managed carefully.
  • Limited Joins
    Joins are supported but can be less efficient and more limited compared to relational databases, affecting complex relational data querying.
  • Indexing Overhead
    Extensive indexing can introduce overhead and impact performance, especially during write operations.
  • Learning Curve
    Requires a different mindset and understanding compared to traditional relational databases, which can present a learning curve for new users.
  • Lacks Mature Analytical Tools
    The ecosystem for analytical tools around MongoDB is not as mature as those for traditional relational databases, which might limit advanced analytics capabilities.
  • Cost
    The cost of using MongoDB's cloud services (MongoDB Atlas) can be high, especially for large-scale deployments.

FileRun videos

How To Make Self Hosted File Manager Like Google Drive FREE using AWS [FILERUN]

MongoDB videos

MySQL vs MongoDB

More videos:

  • Review - The Good and Bad of MongoDB
  • Review - what is mongoDB

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to FileRun and MongoDB)
Cloud Storage
100 100%
0% 0
Databases
0 0%
100% 100
File Sharing
100 100%
0% 0
NoSQL Databases
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using FileRun and MongoDB. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare FileRun and MongoDB

FileRun Reviews

We have no reviews of FileRun yet.
Be the first one to post

MongoDB Reviews

10 Top Firebase Alternatives to Ignite Your Development in 2024
MongoDB’s superpower lies in its flexibility. Its document-based model lets you store data in a free-form, schema-less way, making it adaptable to evolving application needs. Need to add a new field or change the structure of your data? No problem, MongoDB handles it with ease.
Source: genezio.com
Top 7 Firebase Alternatives for App Development in 2024
MongoDB Realm provides a robust alternative to Firebase, especially for apps requiring a flexible data model. Key features include:
Source: signoz.io
Announcing FerretDB 1.0 GA - a truly Open Source MongoDB alternative
MongoDB is no longer open source. We want to bring MongoDB database workloads back to its open source roots. We are enabling PostgreSQL and other database backends to run MongoDB workloads, retaining the opportunities provided by the existing ecosystem around MongoDB.
16 Top Big Data Analytics Tools You Should Know About
The database added a new feature to its list of attributes called MongoDB Atlas. It is a global cloud database technology that allows to deploy a fully managed MongoDB across AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure with its built-in automation for resource, workload optimization and to reduce the time required to handle the database.
9 Best MongoDB alternatives in 2019
MongoDB is an open source NoSQL DBMS which uses a document-oriented database model. It supports various forms of data. However, in MongoDB data consumption is high due to de-normalization.
Source: www.guru99.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, FileRun should be more popular than MongoDB. It has been mentiond 37 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

FileRun mentions (37)

  • Getting started
    - Cloud storage: Filerun lightweight but not very feature rich. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Does anyone use git or github for syncing stuff between computers?
    Yeah, this is the exact reason not to do it. Plus, there are plenty of solutions out there for this exact thing, like google drive, MS onedrive, or something self-hosted like filerun. Source: about 2 years ago
  • New to home server: probably nuking it
    Secure remote access can be facilitated through encrypted tunnels. VPNs, SSH, Cloudflare tunnel, SOCKS, etc. Can all be secure ways of remotely accessing network resources. What you use will vary, depending upon the type of access you require and/or prefer. For file management, there are multiple tools for this task - Nextcloud, Seafile, Pydio, Sandstorm, FileRun, and more available for the choosing. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Just finished migrating my old tower servers to a Kubernetes cluster on my new rack!
    For file storage I use Filerun Enterprise, though I might be moving to Nextcloud eventually. Source: over 2 years ago
  • any ideas on how to improve low disk speed experience?
    Filerun is an example of an alternative, it offers WebDAV and is compatible with the Nextcloud apps, but it's extremely fast compared to Nextcloud. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

MongoDB mentions (18)

  • Creating AI Memories using Rig & MongoDB
    In this article, we’ll build a CLI tool using the Rig AI framework and MongoDB for retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). This tool will store summarized conversations in a database and retrieve them when needed, enabling the AI to maintain context over time. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • The Adventures of Blink S2e2: Database, Contained
    Have a Mongo database holding the various phrases we're going to use and potentially configuration data for the frontend as well. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Introducing Perseid: The Product-oriented JS framework
    It's also worth mentioning that Perseid provides out-of-the-box support for React, VueJS, Svelte, MongoDB, MySQL, PostgreSQL, Express and Fastify. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • DocumentDB Elastic Cluster Pricing
    Does anyone know if the most basic Elastic Cluster instance of DocumentDB carries any monthly fixed cost or is it just on-demand cost? Another words if I run like 10,000 queries against the DB per month, what kind of bill would I expect? This is for a super small app. I am currently using mongodb free tier , but want to migrate everything to AWS. Can't seem to find a straight answer to the pricing question. Source: over 2 years ago
  • I wrote some scripts for converting the UTZOO Usenet archive to a Mongo Database
    You can use either MongoDB.com's dashboard (if you host a remote database) or Mongo Compass to run queries on the data or you can modify the express middleware with your own queries. I'm still working on the API, so it's not very robust yet. I will update this when it is. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing FileRun and MongoDB, you can also consider the following products

PHPfileNavigator - PHPfileNavigator: Administrador de ficheros y directorios via web.

Redis - Redis is an open source in-memory data structure project implementing a distributed, in-memory key-value database with optional durability.

FilesAnywhere - FilesAnywhere offers free 1GB online file storage, with cloud storage solutions for Internet...

PostgreSQL - PostgreSQL is a powerful, open source object-relational database system.

HRCloud2 - A full-featured home-hosted Cloud Drive & Personal Assistant.

MySQL - The world's most popular open source database