Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

FileRun VS Apache Cassandra

Compare FileRun VS Apache Cassandra and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

FileRun logo FileRun

Beautiful, fast and reliable selfhosted file sharing and sync.

Apache Cassandra logo Apache Cassandra

The Apache Cassandra database is the right choice when you need scalability and high availability without compromising performance.
  • FileRun Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-16

Alternative to Google Drive/Dropbox/Box.com/Nextcloud.

  • Apache Cassandra Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-17

FileRun

$ Details
freemium €18.0 / Monthly (10 Users Enterprise Version License)
Release Date
2007 January

FileRun features and specs

  • User-friendly Interface
    FileRun offers a clean and intuitive user interface that makes it easy for users to navigate, manage, and share files without a steep learning curve.
  • Integration with Google Drive/Photos
    FileRun supports seamless integration with Google Drive and Google Photos, enabling users to synchronize and manage files between these cloud services and FileRun.
  • Extensive File Previews
    The platform provides comprehensive file preview options for various file types, including documents, images, audio, and video files, allowing users to view their content without needing to download it first.
  • Customizable
    FileRun is highly customizable, providing options for users to tailor the application to their specific needs, including themes, layout configurations, and functionality extensions.
  • Self-Hosted
    As a self-hosted solution, FileRun offers greater control over data privacy and security, as all data is stored on the user's own server or chosen hosting provider.
  • Collaboration Features
    FileRun includes various collaboration functionalities such as file sharing, version control, and real-time notifications, making team collaboration more efficient.

Possible disadvantages of FileRun

  • Requires Server Setup
    Being a self-hosted solution, FileRun necessitates technical knowledge to set up and maintain the server, which might be challenging for non-technical users.
  • Cost for Extended Features
    While FileRun offers a basic free version, some advanced features require a paid license, which can be a cost consideration for users looking for free file management solutions.
  • Limited Mobile App Support
    FileRun currently does not offer native mobile applications, which may limit the user experience and functionality when accessing files on mobile devices.
  • Dependence on Third-party Tools for Advanced Features
    Certain advanced functionalities, such as full-text search and previewing specific file types, depend on third-party tools and plugins, adding to the complexity and potential cost.
  • Performance Dependent on Hosting
    The performance and speed of FileRun are heavily dependent on the quality of the hosting environment. Poor hosting can lead to slower file access and reduced reliability.
  • Limited Support and Documentation
    Users might find the available support and documentation to be less comprehensive compared to larger, more established file management systems, potentially leading to difficulties in troubleshooting issues.

Apache Cassandra features and specs

  • Scalability
    Apache Cassandra is designed for linear scalability and can handle large volumes of data across many commodity servers without a single point of failure.
  • High Availability
    Cassandra ensures high availability by replicating data across multiple nodes. Even if some nodes fail, the system remains operational.
  • Performance
    It provides fast writes and reads by using a peer-to-peer architecture, making it highly suitable for applications requiring quick data access.
  • Flexible Data Model
    Cassandra supports a flexible schema, allowing users to add new columns to a table at any time, making it adaptable for various use cases.
  • Geographical Distribution
    Data can be distributed across multiple data centers, ensuring low-latency access for geographically distributed users.
  • No Single Point of Failure
    Its decentralized nature ensures there is no single point of failure, which enhances resilience and fault-tolerance.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Cassandra

  • Complexity
    Managing and configuring Cassandra can be complex, requiring specialized knowledge and skills for optimal performance.
  • Eventual Consistency
    Cassandra follows an eventual consistency model, meaning that there might be a delay before all nodes have the latest data, which may not be suitable for all use cases.
  • Write-heavy Operations
    Although Cassandra handles writes efficiently, write-heavy workloads can lead to compaction issues and increased read latency.
  • Limited Query Capabilities
    Cassandra's query capabilities are relatively limited compared to traditional RDBMS, lacking support for complex joins and aggregations.
  • Maintenance Overhead
    Regular maintenance tasks such as node repair and compaction are necessary to ensure optimal performance, adding to the administrative overhead.
  • Tooling and Ecosystem
    While the ecosystem for Cassandra is growing, it is still not as extensive or mature as those for some other database technologies.

Analysis of FileRun

Overall verdict

  • Overall, FileRun is a strong solution for those looking for a self-hosted alternative to cloud-based file management systems. Its comprehensive features and the ability to control one's data make it particularly appealing to users with privacy concerns.

Why this product is good

  • FileRun is considered a good option primarily because it is a powerful, self-hosted file management and collaboration solution. It allows users to have complete control over their data, offers robust features like user access controls, versioning, upload/download links, and integration with Google Docs and Office 365. Users also appreciate its easy-to-use interface and the ability to expand its features with plugins.

Recommended for

  • Businesses looking for a customizable and self-hosted file management solution.
  • Users who prioritize data privacy and security.
  • Teams needing collaborative tools integrated with existing software like Google Docs.
  • Organizations seeking to replace or supplement their existing cloud storage with a self-hosted option.

Analysis of Apache Cassandra

Overall verdict

  • Apache Cassandra is an excellent choice if you require a database system that can efficiently manage large-scale data while ensuring high availability and reliability. It is particularly well-suited for use cases that demand a robust, distributed, and scalable database solution.

Why this product is good

  • Apache Cassandra is a highly scalable and distributed NoSQL database management system designed to handle large amounts of data across multiple commodity servers without a single point of failure. It offers robust support for replicating data across multiple data centers, thereby enhancing fault tolerance and availability. Its masterless architecture and linear scalability make it suitable for high throughput online transactional applications.

Recommended for

  • Applications that require high availability and fault tolerance
  • Systems with large volumes of write-heavy workloads
  • Organizations that need multi-data center replication
  • Businesses seeking a scalable solution for distributed databases
  • Use cases needing real-time data processing with low latency

FileRun videos

How To Make Self Hosted File Manager Like Google Drive FREE using AWS [FILERUN]

Apache Cassandra videos

Course Intro | DS101: Introduction to Apache Cassandra™

More videos:

  • Review - Introduction to Apache Cassandra™

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to FileRun and Apache Cassandra)
Cloud Storage
100 100%
0% 0
Databases
0 0%
100% 100
File Sharing
100 100%
0% 0
NoSQL Databases
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using FileRun and Apache Cassandra. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare FileRun and Apache Cassandra

FileRun Reviews

We have no reviews of FileRun yet.
Be the first one to post

Apache Cassandra Reviews

16 Top Big Data Analytics Tools You Should Know About
Application Areas: If you want to work with SQL-like data types on a No-SQL database, Cassandra is a good choice. It is a popular pick in the IoT, fraud detection applications, recommendation engines, product catalogs and playlists, and messaging applications, providing fast real-time insights.
9 Best MongoDB alternatives in 2019
The Apache Cassandra is an ideal choice for you if you want scalability and high availability without affecting its performance. This MongoDB alternative tool offers support for replicating across multiple datacenters.
Source: www.guru99.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Apache Cassandra might be a bit more popular than FileRun. We know about 44 links to it since March 2021 and only 37 links to FileRun. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

FileRun mentions (37)

  • Getting started
    - Cloud storage: Filerun lightweight but not very feature rich. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Does anyone use git or github for syncing stuff between computers?
    Yeah, this is the exact reason not to do it. Plus, there are plenty of solutions out there for this exact thing, like google drive, MS onedrive, or something self-hosted like filerun. Source: about 2 years ago
  • New to home server: probably nuking it
    Secure remote access can be facilitated through encrypted tunnels. VPNs, SSH, Cloudflare tunnel, SOCKS, etc. Can all be secure ways of remotely accessing network resources. What you use will vary, depending upon the type of access you require and/or prefer. For file management, there are multiple tools for this task - Nextcloud, Seafile, Pydio, Sandstorm, FileRun, and more available for the choosing. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Just finished migrating my old tower servers to a Kubernetes cluster on my new rack!
    For file storage I use Filerun Enterprise, though I might be moving to Nextcloud eventually. Source: over 2 years ago
  • any ideas on how to improve low disk speed experience?
    Filerun is an example of an alternative, it offers WebDAV and is compatible with the Nextcloud apps, but it's extremely fast compared to Nextcloud. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

Apache Cassandra mentions (44)

  • Why You Shouldn’t Invest In Vector Databases?
    In fact, even in the absence of these commercial databases, users can effortlessly install PostgreSQL and leverage its built-in pgvector functionality for vector search. PostgreSQL stands as the benchmark in the realm of open-source databases, offering comprehensive support across various domains of database management. It excels in transaction processing (e.g., CockroachDB), online analytics (e.g., DuckDB),... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Data integrity in Ably Pub/Sub
    All messages are persisted durably for two minutes, but Pub/Sub channels can be configured to persist messages for longer periods of time using the persisted messages feature. Persisted messages are additionally written to Cassandra. Multiple copies of the message are stored in a quorum of globally-distributed Cassandra nodes. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Which Database is Perfect for You? A Comprehensive Guide to MySQL, PostgreSQL, NoSQL, and More
    Cassandra is a highly scalable, distributed NoSQL database designed to handle large amounts of data across many commodity servers without a single point of failure. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Consistent Hashing: An Overview and Implementation in Golang
    Distributed storage Distributed storage systems like Cassandra, DynamoDB, and Voldemort also use consistent hashing. In these systems, data is partitioned across many servers. Consistent hashing is used to map data to the servers that store the data. When new servers are added or removed, consistent hashing minimizes the amount of data that needs to be remapped to different servers. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Understanding SQL vs. NoSQL Databases: A Beginner's Guide
    On the other hand, NoSQL databases are non-relational databases. They store data in flexible, JSON-like documents, key-value pairs, or wide-column stores. Examples include MongoDB, Couchbase, and Cassandra. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing FileRun and Apache Cassandra, you can also consider the following products

PHPfileNavigator - PHPfileNavigator: Administrador de ficheros y directorios via web.

Redis - Redis is an open source in-memory data structure project implementing a distributed, in-memory key-value database with optional durability.

FilesAnywhere - FilesAnywhere offers free 1GB online file storage, with cloud storage solutions for Internet...

MongoDB - MongoDB (from "humongous") is a scalable, high-performance NoSQL database.

HRCloud2 - A full-featured home-hosted Cloud Drive & Personal Assistant.

ArangoDB - A distributed open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values.