Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

FileMaker Pro VS DHTMLX

Compare FileMaker Pro VS DHTMLX and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

FileMaker Pro logo FileMaker Pro

FileMaker Pro Advanced includes all the features of FileMaker Pro plus a set of advanced tools so you can rapidly build powerful custom apps.

DHTMLX logo DHTMLX

JavaScript Library for cross-platform web and mobile app development with HTML5 JavaScript widgets. Easy integration with popular JavaScript Frameworks.
  • FileMaker Pro Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-21
  • DHTMLX Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-27

FileMaker Pro features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    FileMaker Pro features a highly intuitive design with drag-and-drop functionality, making it accessible for users with limited technical skills.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    The software is compatible with both macOS and Windows, offering flexibility for users operating on different systems.
  • Customizability
    Users can create highly customized databases suited to their specific needs, from small business operations to larger enterprise solutions.
  • Integration Capabilities
    FileMaker Pro seamlessly integrates with various external applications and services, including APIs, AppleScript, and ODBC/JDBC connectivity.
  • Rapid Development
    The platform enables quick development and deployment of database solutions, which can be a time-saver for businesses needing immediate solutions.
  • Cloud Hosting
    Claris' cloud hosting option provides secure, centralized access to your databases from anywhere, enhancing collaboration and remote work.
  • Strong Community Support
    A large, active community of users and developers provides extensive resources, forums, and third-party plugins to extend functionality.

Possible disadvantages of FileMaker Pro

  • Cost
    FileMaker Pro can be relatively expensive, especially for small businesses or individual users, considering the licensing fees.
  • Limited Scalability
    It may become less efficient for extremely large, enterprise-level databases, making it less suitable for very high-scale operations.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While basic functions are easy to learn, mastering advanced features and scripting can be complex and may require comprehensive training.
  • Proprietary Nature
    FileMaker uses its own proprietary technology, which can make integration with some other systems and platforms more challenging compared to open-standard solutions.
  • Performance Issues
    Some users report performance slowdowns when dealing with very large datasets or numerous concurrent users.
  • Mobile App Limitations
    The mobile version, FileMaker Go, may have limitations compared to the desktop version, particularly in terms of functionality and complexity.

DHTMLX features and specs

  • Comprehensive Suite
    DHTMLX offers a wide range of UI components, from grids and charts to complex Gantt and scheduler components, providing a comprehensive toolkit for web application development.
  • Rich Documentation
    The platform provides extensive documentation, demos, and examples, which are invaluable for developers in understanding and implementing various components efficiently.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    DHTMLX components are designed to be fully compatible across major browsers, ensuring a consistent user experience regardless of the user's environment.
  • Support and Community
    DHTMLX offers various support options including forums and ticket-based support, alongside a strong user community that can provide insights and assistance.
  • Customizability
    The components are highly customizable, allowing developers to tailor them to fit the specific aesthetics and functionality requirements of their projects.

Possible disadvantages of DHTMLX

  • Cost
    While DHTMLX provides a free version, the full suite with advanced features requires a paid license, which can be a drawback for startups or individual developers with limited budgets.
  • Complexity
    With its comprehensive set of features, DHTMLX can have a steep learning curve for newcomers who are unfamiliar with its architecture and functionalities.
  • Dependency on Proprietary Framework
    Using DHTMLX can lead to a dependency on its particular frameworks and methodologies, which might be a concern for projects that prioritize open-source solutions.
  • Performance Overhead
    Implementing multiple DHTMLX components in a single application might introduce performance overhead, which requires optimization to maintain responsiveness.
  • Limited Open Source Contributions
    As a commercial library, DHTMLX might not benefit from as many open source contributions and innovations as purely open-source alternatives.

FileMaker Pro videos

No FileMaker Pro videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

DHTMLX videos

Dhtmlx Scheduler

More videos:

  • Review - dhtmlxGantt 6.1 Release: Time Constraints, Backward Scheduling, S-curve and dataProcessor Update
  • Review - Dhtmlx-Grid with Flux4 Part2

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to FileMaker Pro and DHTMLX)
Databases
100 100%
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
100% 100
Spreadsheets
100 100%
0% 0
Development Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using FileMaker Pro and DHTMLX. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, DHTMLX seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

FileMaker Pro mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of FileMaker Pro yet. Tracking of FileMaker Pro recommendations started around Mar 2021.

DHTMLX mentions (1)

  • How Much Does It Cost To a Project Management App
    To finish projects on time, efficient time management is a must. To help managers deal with deadlines, we usually implement a fully functional Gantt chart. To create a reliable and user-friendly UI, choosing the right set of tools is essential. In our work, we usually rely on Webix, a JavaScript UI library developed by the brightest minds of XB Software. Another ace up our sleeve is JavaScript UI libraries by... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing FileMaker Pro and DHTMLX, you can also consider the following products

Zoho Creator - Zoho Creator is a low-code application development platform that helps you build a custom, mobile-ready apps to run your business.

Bryntum - High performance web components for SaaS apps - including Gantt, Scheduler, Grid, Calendar and Kanban widgets. Seamless integration with React, Vue, Angular or plain JS apps.

SoftMaker Office - SoftMaker Office is one of the most powerful and reliable office suite that is fully compatible with the MS Office Suite.

jQuery - The Write Less, Do More, JavaScript Library.

Apache OpenOffice - Apache OpenOffice is an open source, office document productivity suite.

Webix UI - An enterprise JavaScript Library for cross-platform app development with HTML5 JavaScript widgets and easy integration with most popular JavaScript Frameworks.