Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Fiidbakk VS Marker.io for GitLab

Compare Fiidbakk VS Marker.io for GitLab and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Fiidbakk logo Fiidbakk

Turn Your Website Into a Feedback Canvas

Marker.io for GitLab logo Marker.io for GitLab

Make it easy for your team and clients to report website feedback into GitLab, without driving developers crazy.
  • Fiidbakk
    Image date //
    2024-12-02
  • Fiidbakk
    Image date //
    2024-12-02
  • Fiidbakk
    Image date //
    2024-12-02

Fiidbakk lets your users leave comments directly on your website—no pre-set questions, just honest feedback where it matters. It helps you understand exactly what users think and where they face issues, giving you clear insights for real improvement.

  • Marker.io for GitLab Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-14

The ultimate QA tool for bug tracking in GitLab

Report feedback on live websites

Log new issues directly into GitLab without leaving your website via the Marker.io feedback button.

Mark up feedback, bugs and issues visually

Your reporters can draw arrows and write text directly on your website using our built-in annotations tools. No more switching to Photoshop or MS Paint.

Centralize everything in GitLab

Gather bug reports and visual feedback directly into GitLab, even from users like clients who do not have a GitLab account.

Marker.io for GitLab

Website
marker.io
$ Details
paid Free Trial $59.0 / Monthly (10 reporters, Unlimited integrations, Unlimited projects,…)
Platforms
Browser Mac OSX Windows iOS Android Cross Platform Chrome OS JavaScript Wordpress Shopify Magento Slack
Release Date
2017 January

Fiidbakk features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Marker.io for GitLab features and specs

  • Seamless Integration
    Marker.io integrates directly with GitLab, allowing users to create issues in their GitLab projects without leaving the Marker.io interface. This seamless integration helps improve workflow efficiency.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Marker.io provides a simple and intuitive interface that makes it easy for team members to report issues with annotated screenshots, making communication clearer and more effective.
  • Screenshot Annotation Tools
    The tool offers robust screenshot annotation features, enabling users to easily highlight specific areas or add comments, which enhances communication and clarity of bug reports.
  • Multiple Platform Support
    Marker.io supports multiple platforms and browsers, ensuring that team members can report issues regardless of their working environment, thereby increasing flexibility and accessibility.
  • Automatic Metadata Capturing
    It automatically captures technical metadata such as browser version, screen size, and operating system details, which helps developers quickly understand the context of the reported issue.

Possible disadvantages of Marker.io for GitLab

  • Pricing
    Marker.io may be considered expensive for small teams or startups with limited budgets, especially when comparing the cost to the number of features provided.
  • Learning Curve
    While the interface is user-friendly, new users might require some time to get accustomed to the full range of features and how best to use them in conjunction with GitLab.
  • Limited Offline Functionality
    The tool heavily relies on an internet connection, which might pose a challenge for users needing to capture issues in environments with limited connectivity.
  • Feature Limitations on Lower Tiers
    Users on lower subscription tiers might find certain advanced features, like deeper customization options, unavailable, necessitating an upgrade for full functionality.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Fiidbakk and Marker.io for GitLab)
Customer Feedback
100 100%
0% 0
Visual Bug Reports
0 0%
100% 100
Realtime Feedback
100 100%
0% 0
Productivity
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Fiidbakk and Marker.io for GitLab. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Fiidbakk and Marker.io for GitLab

Fiidbakk Reviews

  1. Tanel
    · Designer at Give ·
    Great tool for on spot feedback. Very easy.

    Used it for latest web design project between developer, client and designer (strategist) collaboration.

    Developers were happy about the fast and seamless integration. Also that they could understand which parts of the front-end needed attention.

    Client was happy that they had intuitive and user friendly way to leave comments on WIP site instead of lengthy screenshot + comment in apps process. They also find it interesting to include on the live website so that their customers could indicate areas in the upcoming website that need attention.

    I know Fiidbakk is built by a team who cares what they do and it gets just better and better every day.

    🏁 Competitors: MarkUp, Ruttl, Canny.io
    👍 Pros:    Super simple|Easy integration|Generouous free plan|Beautiful minimalist design|Clean ui|User-friendly

Marker.io for GitLab Reviews

We have no reviews of Marker.io for GitLab yet.
Be the first one to post

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Fiidbakk and Marker.io for GitLab, you can also consider the following products

Markup.io - The easiest way to comment and share feedback on over 30 file types. Sign up for free, upload your content, drop a comment, and share for review. Yep, it’s that simple.

Instabug - The top apps in the world rely on Instabug for beta testing, user engagement and crash reporting.

Ruttl - ruttl is the fastest website feedback tool to add comments & make edits on live websites & web apps, so that you can give precise change values to your developers. You can also collect feedback from your clients without login or sign-up!

Buglife - Seriously awesome bug reporting for iOS apps

Canny.io - Canny helps you collect and organize feature requests to better understand customer needs and prioritize your roadmap.

Balto - Easy feedback with screenshot / videos for your beta apps