Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Fider VS Cyclic

Compare Fider VS Cyclic and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Fider logo Fider

Fider is an open source, cross platform and free to use customer feedback platform for companies...

Cyclic logo Cyclic

Full stack Serverless Hosting - Build, Deploy and Host Full Stack JS/TS/nodejs Apps
  • Fider Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-26
  • Cyclic Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-19

There are no servers, no containers, no images, no hours to count. Each app is deployed entirely on serverless cloud infrastructure.

No Sleep

Even with free tier. Apps do not have to sleep, wake up, spin up or recycle. All front-ends and back-ends are ready on-demand, immediately and at all times.

No Overload

Containers make traffic a constant concern because resources are shared across concurrent requests.

On Cyclic, serverless functions are allocated to each individual request on demand, making it possible for your apps to hyper scale.

On Cyclic free tier, an individual 1GB RAM compute instance handles each separate http request. For a single request, this is about ~2x cpu/memory compared to popular container platforms. In a 10 concurrent request scenario, this comparison results in ~200x or 100GB RAM available system compute - on free tier!

Cloud-scale Database and Storage

Database and storage on free tier. 1GB of AWS S3 file object storage as well as a 1GB AWS DynamoDB NoSQL database are available for all apps. Cyclic makes it simple to use the services without having to set up an AWS account. To make using the AWS database even easier, check out our open source DynamoDB SDK

Worldwide

Apps can be launched around the world to make sure your users see the least latency. Apps can also be launched across the world to minimize downtime with default active-active failover strategy.

Fider

Pricing URL
-
$ Details
-
Platforms
-
Release Date
-

Cyclic

Website
cyclic.sh
$ Details
free
Platforms
Node JS
Release Date
2021 July

Fider features and specs

  • User feedback management
    Fider provides a simple and intuitive platform to collect and manage user feedback, which can help in rapidly understanding user needs and prioritizing new features.
  • Open-source
    Being an open-source software, Fider offers the flexibility to be customized to fit specific needs and the ability to contribute to its development.
  • Cost-effective
    Fider can be a cost-effective solution compared to other paid feedback management tools, particularly for small businesses and startups.
  • Integration capabilities
    Fider can be integrated with other tools and systems, enhancing its functionality and facilitating smoother workflows.
  • Self-hosting option
    The option to self-host Fider provides greater control over data privacy and security, which is crucial for organizations with stringent data protection requirements.

Possible disadvantages of Fider

  • Technical expertise required
    Since Fider is open-source and offers self-hosting options, it may require technical expertise to set up, customize, and maintain, which could be a barrier for non-technical users.
  • Lacks advanced features
    Compared to some commercial alternatives, Fider might lack advanced features such as detailed analytics and in-depth reporting.
  • Limited support
    As an open-source product, Fider may not offer the same level of professional support or customer service that proprietary solutions provide.
  • Community-driven updates
    The development and update cycle might be slower or less predictable, as it relies on community contributions rather than a dedicated development team.
  • User experience
    While functional, the user interface of Fider may not be as polished or visually appealing as some of the commercial alternatives, potentially impacting user adoption.

Cyclic features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Cyclic provides a straightforward interface and setup process, making it accessible for developers to deploy and manage apps quickly without extensive configuration.
  • Automated Deployments
    Cyclic supports automated deployments from source code repositories, enabling continuous integration and faster iteration cycles for developers.
  • Scalability
    The platform offers scalability options, allowing applications to handle varying loads without the need for manual intervention.
  • Built-in Monitoring
    Cyclic includes monitoring tools that provide insights into application performance and resource usage, helping developers to proactively manage their services.
  • Cost-Effective
    The service provides various pricing tiers that can be cost-effective for different stages of business growth, offering flexibility in resource usage.

Possible disadvantages of Cyclic

  • Limited Customization
    Cyclic's ease of use can come at the cost of customization, offering fewer options for developers who need extensive configuration capabilities.
  • Dependence on Third-party Integrations
    The platform relies heavily on third-party integrations, which might necessitate additional setup and maintenance efforts from users.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While basic deployment is straightforward, there might be a learning curve associated with some of the more advanced features for inexperienced users.
  • Potential Service Limitations
    Certain features and scalability options might be limited compared to larger cloud providers, which can impact very large or complex deployments.

Analysis of Fider

Overall verdict

  • Fider is generally considered a good choice for teams and organizations seeking a straightforward and effective way to manage user feedback. Its strengths lie in its simplicity, ease of use, and open-source nature, making it a viable option for startups, small to medium enterprises, and projects that value user input.

Why this product is good

  • Fider is a feedback tool designed to help organizations gather and prioritize feedback from users and customers. It is often praised for its user-friendly interface, the ability to manage and categorize feedback efficiently, and its capability to integrate with various project management and communication tools. Fider is also open-source, allowing for customization and flexibility, and has a supportive community for troubleshooting and feature requests.

Recommended for

  • Small to medium-sized businesses looking to streamline their feedback process
  • Teams wanting to integrate user feedback seamlessly with other tools
  • Organizations seeking an open-source solution with customization options
  • Startups aiming to prioritize features based on user demands
  • Projects emphasizing user engagement and feedback for product improvement

Fider videos

No Fider videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Cyclic videos

Cyclic Intro

More videos:

  • Review - Burton [ak] Cyclic GORE-TEX Shell Snowboard Jacket (Men's) | W22/23 Product Review
  • Tutorial - Cyclic mod pack review and tutorial Minecraft, 1.16.5 + 1.17.1
  • Review - Burton Cyclic Jacket Review 2020

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Fider and Cyclic)
Customer Feedback
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Hosting
0 0%
100% 100
User Feedback
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Fider and Cyclic. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Fider and Cyclic

Fider Reviews

17 Best Canny Alternatives in 2024
An open-source alternative to Canny is Fider. Open-source tools like Fider can be beneficial because they allow for custom development and integration. With access to the source code, your team can tailor the tool to your exact requirements. However, it's important to be aware that using an open-source solution often requires technical expertise and resources for setup,...
Source: supahub.com
30+ Customer Feedback Tools comparison
if you got the time, open-source gives you freedom for a custom solution and complete ownership. The only contenders are Fider and ClearFlask both licensed under AGPL3. While Fider is lacking analytic features and scalable infrastructure, it is ideal for small to medium volume. Whereas ClearFlask can be deployed either via a PostgreSQL DB for small deployments or a scalable...
Source: clearflask.com

Cyclic Reviews

We have no reviews of Cyclic yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Cyclic seems to be a lot more popular than Fider. While we know about 21 links to Cyclic, we've tracked only 2 mentions of Fider. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Fider mentions (2)

  • Anyone use a Business Coach
    Next level is using a solution like Fider & assigning one of your staff as owners of gathering top voted feedback. Source: over 3 years ago
  • I have a problem with the management of users feedback for validating my idea
    Fider is the most simplest way to collect feedback and engage with your prospects and customers. getfider.com it is opensource and they have a hosted model with donation option starting from $2. Source: about 4 years ago

Cyclic mentions (21)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Fider and Cyclic, you can also consider the following products

Upvoty - User feedback in 1 simple overview 🔥

Railway - Made for any language, for projects big and small.

Nolt.io - A fast & beautiful way to collect user feedback

Vercel - Vercel is the platform for frontend developers, providing the speed and reliability innovators need to create at the moment of inspiration.

Canny.io - Canny helps you collect and organize feature requests to better understand customer needs and prioritize your roadmap.

Fly.io - Edge computing is the new frontier.