Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

femtolisp VS Clozure Common Lisp

Compare femtolisp VS Clozure Common Lisp and see what are their differences

monday.com
The most intuitive platform to manage projects and teamwork featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

femtolisp logo femtolisp

Robust but lightweight and fast, scheme-like lisp implementation; only 150kb.

Clozure Common Lisp logo Clozure Common Lisp

Clozure CL (often called CCL for short) is a free Common Lisp implementation with a long history.
  • femtolisp Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-23
  • Clozure Common Lisp Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-04-15

femtolisp features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Clozure Common Lisp features and specs

  • High Performance
    Clozure Common Lisp is known for its high performance, especially in numeric computations and complex applications, due to its efficient compiler and runtime system.
  • Cross-platform Support
    CCL runs on multiple platforms including macOS, Linux, and Windows, facilitating development across different operating systems.
  • Dynamic Typing and Flexibility
    CCL, like other Lisp dialects, offers dynamic typing and flexibility which allows developers to write code that can be easily modified and extended.
  • Interactivity
    CCL provides a powerful interactive development environment with a Read-Eval-Print Loop (REPL), allowing developers to test and debug code on the fly.
  • Compatibility with Common Lisp
    Being a comprehensive implementation of Common Lisp, CCL supports a wide range of Lisp features, making it compatible with existing Common Lisp codebases.
  • Active Community
    CCL has an active community that contributes to its development and support, resulting in a wealth of libraries and resources.

Possible disadvantages of Clozure Common Lisp

  • Limited GUI Libraries
    Clozure Common Lisp's support for graphical user interfaces is limited compared to other platforms, which may require additional effort for developing desktop applications.
  • Smaller User Base
    Compared to more mainstream languages like Python or Java, CCL has a smaller user base, which may result in less community support and fewer third-party libraries.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    As with many Lisp dialects, CCL can have a steep learning curve for developers unfamiliar with Lisp syntax and concepts.
  • Less Documentation
    Although there is documentation available, it may not be as extensive or detailed as that for more widely-used languages, potentially hindering new users.
  • Interoperability Challenges
    While CCL can interoperate with C and other languages, setting this up can be complex and may pose challenges for developers needing seamless integration.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to femtolisp and Clozure Common Lisp)

femtolisp

Clozure Common Lisp

IDE
21 21%
IDE
79% 79
Programming Language
19 19%
Programming Language
81% 81
Text Editors
34 34%
Text Editors
66% 66
OOP
25 25%
OOP
75% 75

User comments

Share your experience with using femtolisp and Clozure Common Lisp. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Clozure Common Lisp seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 6 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

femtolisp mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of femtolisp yet. Tracking of femtolisp recommendations started around Feb 2022.

Clozure Common Lisp mentions (6)

  • Graphics Livecoding in Common Lisp
    Unfortunately CCL is Intel only on macOS. (macOS is not on the the main page https://ccl.clozure.com) Otherwise this is the one I would use as it has good Cocoa interoperability. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • The IDEs we had 30 years ago and we lost
    The descendant of CCL runs on modern Intel Macs. (It also runs on Linux and Windows but without the IDE.) The modern IDE is quite a bit different from the original. In particular, it no longer has the interface builder. But it's still pretty good. It is now called Clozure Common Lisp (so the acronym is still CCL) and you can find it here: https://ccl.clozure.com/ If you want to run the original that is a bit... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • The Saga of the Closure Compiler, and Why TypeScript Won
    Just for fun there is also Clozure Common Lisp. https://ccl.clozure.com/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Consuming HTTP endpoint using Common Lisp
    I have decided it is time to have some fun and use Common Lisp to create algorithm representation that deals with parallel execution. For this I decided to use Clozure common lisp, put basic Qucklisp there and load some libraries to do this. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Corman Lisp development environment for MS Windows
    CCL also supports windows: https://ccl.clozure.com/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing femtolisp and Clozure Common Lisp, you can also consider the following products

Hy - Hy is a wonderful dialect of Lisp that’s embedded in Python.

CMU Common Lisp - CMUCL is a high-performance, free Common Lisp implementation.

Steel Bank Common Lisp - Steel Bank Common Lisp (SBCL) is a high performance Common Lisp compiler.

Armed Bear Common Lisp - Armed Bear Common Lisp (ABCL) is a full implementation of the Common Lisp language featuring both...

CLISP - CLISP is a portable ANSI Common Lisp implementation and development environment by Bruno Haible.

ManKai Common Lisp - ManKai Common Lisp (MKCL) aims to be a full implementation of the Common Lisp language in...

Loading...