Software Alternatives & Startups

fd VS ptpython

Compare fd VS ptpython and see what are their differences

fd

A simple, fast and user-friendly alternative to 'find'.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
ptpython

a better Python REPL

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, fd seems to be a lot more popular than ptpython. While we know about 130 links to fd, we've tracked only 11 mentions of ptpython.

social mentions
130 vs 11
Note Taking popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
72 vs 18

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

fd
ptpython
Website github.com github.com
Pricing
Open source
Open source
Company Startup from Germany —
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

fd 6 features
ptpython 5 features
  • Speed
    fd is optimized for speed and can outperform traditional tools like find due to its use of parallelism and optimized algorithms.
  • Ease of Use
    fd has a simpler and more user-friendly syntax compared to find, making it easier to learn and use.
  • Colorized Output
    fd provides colorized output by default, making it easier to differentiate between file types and enhancing readability.
  • Smart Case
    fd enables smart case detection by default, meaning searches are case-insensitive unless the pattern includes an uppercase letter.
  • Defaults to Ignoring Hidden Files
    By default, fd ignores hidden files and directories, as well as files specified in .gitignore, helping to narrow down search results to relevant files.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    fd supports multiple platforms including Linux, macOS, and Windows, making it versatile for different development environments.

Possible disadvantages

  • Dependency on Rust
    fd requires the Rust toolchain to build, which may be inconvenient for environments where installing additional dependencies is restricted.
  • Limited to Modern Features
    fd may not support some legacy systems and older versions of operating systems, limiting its applicability in certain scenarios.
  • Not as Feature-Rich
    While fd is easier to use, it doesn't have all the advanced features and fine-grained control options that find offers.
  • Compatibility
    fd’s simplified syntax and modern features may not be directly compatible with scripts or workflows that depend on find, requiring adjustments for integration.
  • Syntax Highlighting
    Ptpython provides syntax highlighting which makes the code easier to read and write, helping users to identify elements such as keywords, strings, and variables quickly.
  • Autocompletion
    The tool offers powerful autocompletion, allowing for faster code writing by suggesting variable names, functions, and methods as you type.
  • Vi and Emacs Keybindings
    Support for both Vi and Emacs keybindings means users can navigate and edit code using their preferred text-editing shortcuts, enhancing productivity and comfort.
  • Embeddable
    Ptpython can be embedded in other applications, providing a flexible option to integrate an interactive shell within custom projects.
  • Customizable Configuration
    Users can customize various options in ptpython using a Python file, allowing for a highly personalized interactive environment.

Possible disadvantages

  • Dependency on prompt-toolkit
    Ptpython requires the installation of the prompt-toolkit library, adding a dependency that needs to be managed within your environment.
  • Steeper Learning Curve
    For those unfamiliar with interactive Python shells or text-editor keybindings, ptpython might present a steeper learning curve compared to simpler alternatives like the default Python REPL.
  • Resource Consumption
    The advanced features of ptpython, such as real-time syntax highlighting and auto-completion, may consume more system resources compared to the standard Python shell.
  • Limited Library Support
    While ptpython itself is well-supported, users might encounter compatibility issues or lack of support with other third-party libraries or extensions they wish to use.
  • Potential for Overhead
    For simple tasks or quick tests, the additional features of ptpython may introduce unnecessary overhead compared to using a basic Python shell.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

fd
ptpython

Overall verdict

  • Yes, fd (github.com) is generally considered good, particularly for its speed, ease of use, and modern features that enhance productivity over the traditional 'find' command.

Why this product is good

  • fd is a program for users who need a fast and user-friendly alternative to the traditional 'find' command. It provides a simple syntax, speed improvements by parallelizing search processes, ignores hidden files and directories by default, and offers colorized outputs, making it more intuitive and efficient for everyday use.

Recommended for

    fd is recommended for developers, system administrators, and power users who often search through directories and require a fast, efficient tool with a shorter learning curve.

No analysis of ptpython yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

fd 3 videos + Add
ptpython 1 video + Add

Discmania FD (Fairway Driver) Golf Disc Review

More videos

  • - Honda Civic FD | Review & Tips If you want to own one
  • - Regular Car Reviews: 1993 Mazda RX-7 FD

A BETTER PYTHON REPL (READ EVAL PRINT LOOP) - PTPYTHON

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
fd
ptpython
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using fd and ptpython. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

fd 130 mentions
ptpython 11 mentions
  • I Replaced a 461-Million-Downloads-a-Month Glob Package With One Rust File
    Fast-glob was the Package Killer target, but it was not the only comparison worth making. Developers often reach for fd or ripgrep when they need to locate files from a terminal. They are mature native tools with excellent defaults, so... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • I wrote an bash enumerator because I was sick of xargs
    > Find works, but the syntax is arcane. Fd is a lifesaver: https://github.com/sharkdp/fd. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Biff is a command line datetime Swiss army knife
    I know that if you want `fd` (https://github.com/sharkdp/fd) you need to `apt install fd-find` and which installs the binary `fdfind` (!). - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

View more

  • Why Lisp?
    If you like using the REPL, for Python I recommend you try https://github.com/prompt-toolkit/ptpython. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • Tools for productivity
    REPL??? Do you have a very-easy-to-use way of running and testing your code? From vim-slime to nvim sniprun to autocommands with the built in terminal, to an external repl like ptpython (for python obviously). iron.nvim and conjure are... Source: over 3 years ago
  • Is there a vim mode for zsh ?
    I use ptpython for my python repl https://github.com/prompt-toolkit/ptpython. I find it very convenient because it has a vim mode, and many vim similarities. Source: over 3 years ago

View more

Alternatives to fd and ptpython

When comparing fd and ptpython, you can also consider the following products.