Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Factiva VS Icypeas

Compare Factiva VS Icypeas and see what are their differences

Factiva logo Factiva

Built by Dow Jones, Factiva is a news aggregate service with a focus on helping business owners and investors stay ahead of the market curve.

Icypeas logo Icypeas

This email finder has the capacity to bypass catch-alls
  • Factiva Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-17
  • Icypeas
    Image date //
    2024-01-04
  • Icypeas
    Image date //
    2024-01-04
  • Icypeas
    Image date //
    2024-01-04

  • Pay for verified emails only. We charge 1 credit only if your email search is successful.
  • Bypass catch-alls and reach out to untapped leads.
  • Minimize your bounce rate and preserve your email deliverability.

Factiva features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Icypeas features and specs

  • Email finder: Yes
  • Email verifier: Yes
  • Domain scan: Yes
  • Catch-all bypass: Yes

Factiva videos

Review & Repeat Searches -- Factiva demo

More videos:

  • Review - Factiva Mobile - Get the News You Need Overview
  • Review - Finding the Australian Financial Review on Factiva

Icypeas videos

Product Tour

More videos:

  • Demo - 1-min Explainer

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Factiva and Icypeas)
Data Integration
100 100%
0% 0
Lead Generation
0 0%
100% 100
Sales Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Email Finder
0 0%
100% 100

Questions and Answers

As answered by people managing Factiva and Icypeas.

What makes your product unique?

Icypeas's answer:

Icypeas has an unparalleled capacity to verify catch-all emails. It allows you to reach out to untapped leads.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

Icypeas's answer:

Icypeas is a good choice if you care about email discovery rate and bounce rate.

Honest drawbacks: - we are not an all-in-one platform like Apollo.io, which is a lead database, an enrichment tool and an outreach solution, whereas Icypeas focusses on enrichment only. - our response time (for an email search) is between 1 and 5 minutes. It is longer than all our competitors. This is true for single searches, not for bulk searches. When it comes to bulk searches, we are way faster than the competition (because we have a huge capacity to parallelize requests).

How would you describe your primary audience?

Icypeas's answer:

Salespeople in B2B SaaS companies and lead generation agencies.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Icypeas's answer:

Node.js, Vue.js, Elasticsearch, MongoDB. We plan to replace Node with Rust soon.

User comments

Share your experience with using Factiva and Icypeas. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Factiva and Icypeas, you can also consider the following products

Software AG webMethods - Software AG’s webMethods enables you to quickly integrate systems, partners, data, devices and SaaS applications

Dropcontact - Get the sh** out of your contact data

IBM MQ - IBM MQ is messaging middleware that simplifies and accelerates the integration of diverse applications and data across multiple platforms.

Apollo.io - Apollo’s predictive prospecting, sales engagement, and actionable analytics help the teams to reach its full revenue potential.

Oracle BAM - BAM Main OTN Page

Hunter - Find all the email addresses related to a domain