Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
FFS

F# (via FunScript) VS ClojureScript

Compare F# (via FunScript) VS ClojureScript and see what are their differences

bunq
bank of the Free! Mobile banking that makes life easy. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

F# (via FunScript) logo F# (via FunScript)

Web Development

ClojureScript logo ClojureScript

A Clojure compiler targeting JavaScript
  • F# (via FunScript) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-02-18
  • ClojureScript Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-06

F# (via FunScript) features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

ClojureScript features and specs

  • Immutable Data Structures
    ClojureScript provides persistent, immutable data structures which simplify reasoning about code and avoiding unintended side effects.
  • Functional Programming
    ClojureScript is a Lisp that encourages functional programming, aiding the creation of concise and predictable code.
  • Interoperability with JavaScript
    ClojureScript can interoperate seamlessly with JavaScript, allowing access to JavaScript libraries and facilitating interaction with existing JavaScript codebases.
  • REPL Driven Development
    The REPL (Read-Eval-Print Loop) in ClojureScript enables rapid testing and iteration of code, resulting in more efficient development processes.
  • Rich Ecosystem
    ClojureScript benefits from the rich ecosystem of Clojure libraries and tools, as well as those available in the JavaScript ecosystem.

Possible disadvantages of ClojureScript

  • Learning Curve
    ClojureScript has a steep learning curve for developers new to Lisp or functional programming paradigms, which may limit its initial adoption.
  • Compilation Overhead
    Unlike JavaScript, ClojureScript code needs to be compiled, which can add complexity and overhead to the development workflow.
  • Smaller Community
    ClojureScript has a smaller community compared to more mainstream JavaScript frameworks, which can affect the availability of resources and support.
  • Tooling Complexity
    Integrating ClojureScript into existing projects can be complex, and its tooling setup might not be as straightforward as more established JavaScript tools.
  • Performance
    While generally performant, ClojureScript applications can sometimes face performance penalties due to the abstraction layers involved.

F# (via FunScript) videos

No F# (via FunScript) videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

ClojureScript videos

+ Add

How to use NPM Packages in ClojureScript

More videos:

  • Review - ClojureScript - Chris Houser
  • Review - ClojureScript Release - Rich Hickey

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to F# (via FunScript) and ClojureScript)

F# (via FunScript)

ClojureScript

Personal Finance
24 24%
Personal Finance
76% 76
Financial Planner
34 34%
Financial Planner
66% 66
Finance
100 100%
Finance
0% 0
Cryptocurrencies
0 0%
Cryptocurrencies
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using F# (via FunScript) and ClojureScript. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, ClojureScript seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 17 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

F# (via FunScript) mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of F# (via FunScript) yet. Tracking of F# (via FunScript) recommendations started around Mar 2021.

ClojureScript mentions (17)

  • jQuery v4.0.0 Beta
    LISP in the browser! You end up having to shit a large runtime with your app but it all transpiles to vanilla JS. https://clojurescript.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Ask HN: Why don't browsers just build a non-JS interpreter?
    JS isn't perfect, but it's good enough. And there is ongoing effort to make it even better. Also, many other languages compile to JS (without WASM). Notably: - https://www.typescriptlang.org/ - https://coffeescript.org/ - https://clojurescript.org/ - https://www.transcrypt.org/ I wrote https://multi-launch.leftium.com, which is only 6% JS. The majority is Svelte (65%) + TypeScript (27%). ( - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Implement functional programming in Sass
    A few years ago, I started learning the ClojureScript language and quickly became fascinated with functional programming. One day, I wondered if it would be possible to implement a similar programming style in Sass, allowing for anonymous functions and threading macros. After conducting some experiments, I came up with the following Sass functions:. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • HTMX is the future
    I also didn't cheat by transpiling Clojure into JavaScript. (see ClojureScript). - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • Which dialect to choose.
    Clojure has also a mature compiler to JavaScript. https://clojurescript.org/. Source: about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing F# (via FunScript) and ClojureScript, you can also consider the following products

Mint - Free personal finance software to assist you to manage your money, financial planning, and budget planning tools. Achieve your financial goals with Mint.

ReasonML - ReasonML is a new face to OCaml that--when coupled with BuckleScript--makes web development easy...

EarlGrey - EarlGrey is a native iOS UI automation test framework that enables you to write clear, concise tests.

GnuCash - A personal and small-business financial-accounting software, licensed under GNU/GPL and available for Linux, Windows, Mac OS X, BSD, and Solaris.

Tcl - Already one of the world's best-selling consumer electronics brands, TCL is now the fastest-growing TV brand in North America. TCL TVs feature stylish design and the latest technology.

Opal (Ruby) - Ruby to Javascript Compiler. It is source-to-source, making it fast as a runtime. Opal includes a compiler (which can be run in any browser), a corelib and runtime implementation.

Loading...