Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

EyeJS VS BrowserStack

Compare EyeJS VS BrowserStack and see what are their differences

EyeJS logo EyeJS

A JavaScript testing framework for the real world.

BrowserStack logo BrowserStack

BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.
  • EyeJS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-08-24
  • BrowserStack Landing page
    Landing page //
    2025-05-06

BrowserStack is a leading software testing platform powering over two million tests every day across 15 global data centers. With BrowserStack, developers can comprehensively test their websites and mobile applications across 2,000+ real mobile devices and browsers in a single cloud platform—and at scale. BrowserStack helps Tesco, Shell, NVIDIA, Discovery, Wells Fargo, and over 50,000 customers deliver quality software at speed.

EyeJS

Website
eye.js.org
Pricing URL
-
$ Details
-
Platforms
-
Release Date
-

BrowserStack

$ Details
freemium $29.0 / Monthly (Starts at single user plans and billed annually)
Platforms
Mac OSX Android Windows Browser Web iOS Google Chrome Firefox Safari REST API Internet Explorer
Release Date
2012 September
Startup details
Country
Ireland
State
Dublin
City
Dublin
Founder(s)
Nakul Aggarwal
Employees
500 - 999

EyeJS features and specs

  • Simplicity
    EyeJS offers a straightforward API that makes it easy for developers to write and understand tests without a steep learning curve.
  • Speed
    It is designed to run tests quickly, reducing the time taken for feedback and allowing rapid iterations during development.
  • Lightweight
    Being a lightweight framework, EyeJS does not add significant overhead to projects and is easy to integrate without bloat.
  • Minimal Configuration
    EyeJS requires very little configuration to get started, enabling developers to focus on writing tests rather than setting up the environment.
  • Modern JavaScript Support
    It supports modern JavaScript syntax and features, allowing developers to write tests in the same style as their application code.

Possible disadvantages of EyeJS

  • Limited Features
    Compared to more established testing frameworks, EyeJS might lack advanced features that some developers may need for complex projects.
  • Community and Ecosystem
    EyeJS has a smaller community and ecosystem, which can result in fewer resources, plugins, and integrations compared to larger frameworks.
  • Documentation
    The documentation may not be as comprehensive as that of more mature projects, potentially making it harder for newcomers to resolve issues.
  • Less Adoption
    EyeJS is less widely adopted than some other testing frameworks, which may impact the availability of community support and shared knowledge.
  • Limited Test Types
    It might be more suited for simple unit tests and could struggle with more complex testing requirements, such as end-to-end testing.

BrowserStack features and specs

  • Cloud-based
  • Browser Extensions
  • SaaS

EyeJS videos

No EyeJS videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

BrowserStack videos

BrowserStack Overview

More videos:

  • Tutorial - SpeedLab by BrowserStack
  • Review - SharePoint Team Finds BrowserStack Invaluable

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to EyeJS and BrowserStack)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Website Testing
0 0%
100% 100
Front End Package Manager
Browser Testing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using EyeJS and BrowserStack. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare EyeJS and BrowserStack

EyeJS Reviews

We have no reviews of EyeJS yet.
Be the first one to post

BrowserStack Reviews

Top Selenium Alternatives
BrowserStack is another leading cloud-based testing platform that offers access to a vast array of browsers and real mobile devices. It's designed to simplify the testing process by allowing tests to run in parallel across different environments, significantly reducing the time needed for comprehensive testing. BrowserStack features include live, interactive testing,...
Source: bugbug.io
Why choose HeadSpin over BrowserStack?
Companies like HeadSpin and BrowserStack play a significant role in fulfilling the demand for testing on real devices and cross-browser devices. Their ability to test on real devices online and monitor digital experiences adds to the value proposition of organizations implementing testing solutions. However, every company has different requirements and here are a few reasons...
Source: www.headspin.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, BrowserStack seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

EyeJS mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of EyeJS yet. Tracking of EyeJS recommendations started around Mar 2021.

BrowserStack mentions (7)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing EyeJS and BrowserStack, you can also consider the following products

Chai - Chai is a BDD / TDD assertion library for node and the browser that can be delightfully paired with any javascript testing framework.

LambdaTest - Perform Web Testing on 2000+ Browsers & OS

Enzyme - Enzyme is a JavaScript testing utility for React.

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

Ava - Making conversations accessible for the deaf

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.