Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

eXistdb VS Apache Santuario

Compare eXistdb VS Apache Santuario and see what are their differences

eXistdb logo eXistdb

High-performance native XML database engine and all-in-one solution for application building.

Apache Santuario logo Apache Santuario

Apache Santuario - Index
  • eXistdb Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-07-11
  • Apache Santuario Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-02-08

eXistdb features and specs

  • XML Native Storage
    eXist-db is designed to natively store XML data, allowing for efficient querying and manipulation of XML structures without needing to transform them into a relational format.
  • XQuery Support
    eXist-db provides strong support for XQuery, the W3C standard query language for XML, enabling complex queries and transformations of XML data.
  • Indexing Capabilities
    It offers advanced indexing options for XML data, such as full-text indexing and range indexing, which can improve search performance significantly.
  • Extensible and Open Source
    Being open source, eXist-db allows users to extend its capabilities and adapt it according to specific needs without licensing costs.
  • REST and WebDAV Interfaces
    eXist-db provides RESTful and WebDAV interfaces, facilitating integration with other web services and applications, and enabling remote management of data.

Possible disadvantages of eXistdb

  • Performance Limitations
    There might be performance challenges when dealing with extremely large datasets compared to some relational database systems.
  • Limited Non-XML Support
    While optimized for XML, eXist-db might not be the best choice for applications dealing extensively with non-XML data or requiring complex relational database features.
  • Learning Curve
    Developers new to XML databases and XQuery might face a steeper learning curve, as they need to become proficient in these technologies to fully leverage eXist-db.
  • Community and Ecosystem Size
    Compared to larger database systems, the eXist-db community and ecosystem are smaller, which might affect the availability of third-party tools and community support.
  • Scalability Concerns
    While eXist-db is powerful in handling XML data, scalability in distributed environments might be more challenging than in some other database systems designed for horizontal scaling.

Apache Santuario features and specs

  • Security
    Apache Santuario provides robust XML signature and encryption capabilities, enhancing the security of XML data transmission and storage.
  • Compatibility
    It adheres to W3C standards for XML encryption and signing, ensuring broad compatibility with other XML processing systems and applications.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project under the Apache Software Foundation, it allows for community-driven development and use without licensing fees.
  • Flexibility
    Supports a wide range of cryptographic algorithms and configurations, allowing developers to tailor its usage according to their specific security needs.
  • Integration
    Can be integrated into existing applications with relative ease, using its well-documented API.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Santuario

  • Complexity
    Setting up and correctly configuring XML signatures and encryption can be complex, requiring a good understanding of cryptographic concepts.
  • Performance Overheads
    The use of XML security can introduce performance overheads, as processing of XML signatures and encryption is computationally intensive.
  • Documentation
    While documentation exists, it may not always cover every use case comprehensively, requiring developers to seek additional help or resources.
  • Learning Curve
    Developers unfamiliar with XML security standards or Apache Santuario might face a steep learning curve when starting out.
  • Community Support
    The community is smaller compared to more popular open-source projects, which might limit the availability of third-party resources and support.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to eXistdb and Apache Santuario)
Text Editors
50 50%
50% 50
Task Management
51 51%
49% 49
Databases
51 51%
49% 49
NoSQL Databases
50 50%
50% 50

User comments

Share your experience with using eXistdb and Apache Santuario. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Santuario seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

eXistdb mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of eXistdb yet. Tracking of eXistdb recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Apache Santuario mentions (1)

  • Consuming SOAP and REST apis from my C++ application?
    I've just examined the structure of a standard SOAP package and yes - it looks easy as hell to build it myself. I already have tinyxml in my project, anyway. The only thing that leaves me in doubt is the xml signature. I am thinking about https://santuario.apache.org/ ? Source: about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing eXistdb and Apache Santuario, you can also consider the following products

BaseX - BaseX is a very light-weight, high-performance and scalable XML Database engine and XPath/XQuery...

MarkLogic - Schema-agnostic Enterprise NoSQL database technology, coupled w/ powerful search & flexible application services

Apache Xerces - Advanced XML parser, including support for XML Schema, DOM Level 2, and SAX.

Qizx - XML Databases

Apache Anakia - XML Databases

Apache Xalan - XML Databases