Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache Xerces VS eXistdb

Compare Apache Xerces VS eXistdb and see what are their differences

Apache Xerces logo Apache Xerces

Advanced XML parser, including support for XML Schema, DOM Level 2, and SAX.

eXistdb logo eXistdb

High-performance native XML database engine and all-in-one solution for application building.
  • Apache Xerces Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-03-20
  • eXistdb Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-07-11

Apache Xerces features and specs

  • Standards Compliance
    Apache Xerces is highly compliant with XML standards, including XML Schema, DOM, and SAX, which ensures robust processing and validation of XML documents.
  • Wide Language Support
    Xerces offers support for multiple programming languages, including Java, C++, and Perl, providing flexibility and integration in various development environments.
  • Community Support
    Being an Apache Software Foundation project, Xerces benefits from strong community support and regular updates, which enhances reliability and addresses security concerns.
  • Extensibility
    The library is designed to be extensible, allowing developers to customize its behavior and extend its capabilities to meet specific needs.
  • Open Source
    Xerces is open-source software, available for free under the Apache License, making it a cost-effective solution for both personal and commercial use.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Xerces

  • Complexity
    The extensive features and capabilities of Xerces can lead to increased complexity, which might be overwhelming for developers who need a simple XML solution.
  • Performance Overheads
    Due to its comprehensive feature set and strict standards compliance, Xerces might introduce performance overheads compared to simpler XML parsing libraries.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    New users may find Xerces challenging to learn, especially if they are not already familiar with XML and related technologies.
  • Limited Non-XML Functionality
    Xerces is specifically focused on XML parsing and validation, which means it lacks features for handling other types of data or file formats.
  • Deprecation and Maintenance
    Some aspects of the library may not be actively maintained or could become deprecated, potentially leading to compatibility and security issues over time.

eXistdb features and specs

  • XML Native Storage
    eXist-db is designed to natively store XML data, allowing for efficient querying and manipulation of XML structures without needing to transform them into a relational format.
  • XQuery Support
    eXist-db provides strong support for XQuery, the W3C standard query language for XML, enabling complex queries and transformations of XML data.
  • Indexing Capabilities
    It offers advanced indexing options for XML data, such as full-text indexing and range indexing, which can improve search performance significantly.
  • Extensible and Open Source
    Being open source, eXist-db allows users to extend its capabilities and adapt it according to specific needs without licensing costs.
  • REST and WebDAV Interfaces
    eXist-db provides RESTful and WebDAV interfaces, facilitating integration with other web services and applications, and enabling remote management of data.

Possible disadvantages of eXistdb

  • Performance Limitations
    There might be performance challenges when dealing with extremely large datasets compared to some relational database systems.
  • Limited Non-XML Support
    While optimized for XML, eXist-db might not be the best choice for applications dealing extensively with non-XML data or requiring complex relational database features.
  • Learning Curve
    Developers new to XML databases and XQuery might face a steeper learning curve, as they need to become proficient in these technologies to fully leverage eXist-db.
  • Community and Ecosystem Size
    Compared to larger database systems, the eXist-db community and ecosystem are smaller, which might affect the availability of third-party tools and community support.
  • Scalability Concerns
    While eXist-db is powerful in handling XML data, scalability in distributed environments might be more challenging than in some other database systems designed for horizontal scaling.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Xerces and eXistdb)
Task Management
37 37%
63% 63
Databases
38 38%
62% 62
Text Editors
43 43%
57% 57
NoSQL Databases
33 33%
67% 67

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Xerces and eXistdb. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Xerces seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache Xerces mentions (1)

  • What second language to learn after Python?
    Well, regarding HTML5, what I've found was libxml (does not support tag-soup HTML5), https://github.com/lexbor/lexbor, for which I was unable to find good documentation ( see https://lexbor.com/docs/lexbor/#dom), Apache Xerces (appears to not support tag-soup HTML5 as well), and Gumbo, which does not appear to be active and to support selectors and XPath (although there are libraries that add that). Source: almost 4 years ago

eXistdb mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of eXistdb yet. Tracking of eXistdb recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Xerces and eXistdb, you can also consider the following products

MarkLogic - Schema-agnostic Enterprise NoSQL database technology, coupled w/ powerful search & flexible application services

BaseX - BaseX is a very light-weight, high-performance and scalable XML Database engine and XPath/XQuery...

Apache Anakia - XML Databases

Qizx - XML Databases

Apache Santuario - Apache Santuario - Index

Apache Axiom - XML Databases