Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
EV

EVmatch VS Pixi.js

Compare EVmatch VS Pixi.js and see what are their differences

DocRaptor
As the only API powered by the Prince HTML-to-PDF engine, DocRaptor provides the best support for complex PDFs with powerful support for headers, page breaks, page numbers, flexbox, watermarks, accessible PDFs, and much more featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

EVmatch logo EVmatch

Peer-to-peer electric vehicle charging

Pixi.js logo Pixi.js

Fast lightweight 2D library that works across all devices
  • EVmatch Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-14
  • Pixi.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-14

EVmatch features and specs

  • Peer-to-Peer Network
    EVmatch provides a peer-to-peer network for EV charging, allowing users to rent personal charging stations, thus increasing accessibility to charging points in residential areas.
  • Flexibility
    The platform offers significant flexibility, enabling users to find and reserve charging spots at convenient times and locations, which can be more adaptable than traditional charging networks.
  • Cost Efficiency
    Users might find charging rates to be more economical than commercial charging stations, as they are set by individual station owners and can vary based on demand and location.
  • Community Building
    By facilitating interactions between EV drivers and charging station owners, EVmatch helps strengthen community ties and encourages the adoption of sustainable practices.

Possible disadvantages of EVmatch

  • Network Limitations
    The availability of charging stations may be limited in less populated or less tech-savvy areas, reducing the network's effectiveness compared to more established commercial networks.
  • Variability in Charging Experience
    Since charging stations are individually owned, the quality, maintenance, and reliability of the stations can vary, potentially leading to inconsistent user experiences.
  • Dependency on User Base
    The effectiveness of the service heavily depends on having a large and active user base willing to share their charging stations, which can fluctuate and affect availability.
  • Potential for Higher Costs at Peak Times
    During high-demand periods, prices set by station owners might increase, potentially leading to higher costs than traditional charging networks during these times.

Pixi.js features and specs

  • High Performance
    Pixi.js utilizes WebGL to deliver high-performance rendering, which is ideal for building fast and responsive web applications and games.
  • Cross-Platform
    It supports multiple platforms, allowing developers to build applications that work seamlessly across different devices, including desktops, tablets, and smartphones.
  • Extensive Documentation
    Pixi.js has comprehensive and well-documented resources that help developers understand how to use the library effectively, including tutorials and examples.
  • Rich Feature Set
    The library comes with a wide range of features such as textures, sprites, and filters, enabling developers to create visually complex and appealing content.
  • Active Community
    Pixi.js benefits from a large and active community, which means frequent updates, a wealth of plugins, and abundant community support.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source library, Pixi.js is free to use and modify, making it accessible to developers with different levels of expertise and budgets.

Possible disadvantages of Pixi.js

  • Learning Curve
    Despite its extensive documentation, beginners may find Pixi.js challenging to learn and integrate into their projects because of its extensive feature set.
  • WebGL Dependencies
    While WebGL provides high performance, it can also cause compatibility issues on older devices or browsers that do not fully support WebGL.
  • Limited 3D Capabilities
    Pixi.js is primarily a 2D rendering engine, so it may not be suitable for projects that require advanced 3D graphics and interactions.
  • Size
    Compared to simpler libraries, Pixi.js can be relatively large in terms of file size, which could impact the loading times of web applications, especially on slower networks.
  • Complex Debugging
    Debugging issues in Pixi.js can be complex, especially in large applications, as it often involves low-level graphics operations and WebGL debugging tools.

Analysis of Pixi.js

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Pixi.js is generally considered a good choice for 2D graphics rendering on the web.

Why this product is good

  • Performance: Pixi.js is known for its fast 2D rendering performance, leveraging WebGL and falling back to HTML5 Canvas when necessary.
  • Ease of Use: It has a straightforward API, which makes it accessible for both beginners and experienced developers.
  • Community: There's a strong and active community around Pixi.js, providing plenty of resources, plugins, and support.
  • Features: It offers a robust set of features for 2D graphics, including support for sprites, text, animation, and interaction.
  • Cross-Platform: Pixi.js works across different devices and browsers, ensuring broad compatibility.

Recommended for

  • Game Developers: Those looking to create 2D games with efficient rendering.
  • Web Developers: Developers needing to incorporate graphics or animations into their web projects.
  • Digital Artists: Artists wanting to create interactive experiences or digital art pieces.
  • Educators: Those educating others in graphics programming or web development.

EVmatch videos

+ Add

Wallbox Home and Commercial EV Charging Stations Integrated with EVmatch Software

More videos:

  • Review - Meet the Electric Car Charging Matchmaker: EVmatch App
  • Tutorial - How to Charge Your Electric Vehicle with EVmatch Using Reservations or Charge Now

Pixi.js videos

+ Add

PixiJS Crash Course

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to EVmatch and Pixi.js)

EVmatch

Pixi.js

Cars
100 100%
Cars
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
Javascript UI Libraries
100% 100
Transportation
100 100%
Transportation
0% 0
Development
0 0%
Development
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using EVmatch and Pixi.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Pixi.js should be more popular than EVmatch. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

EVmatch mentions (2)

  • Experience with owning an EV in DC?
    There are also peer to peer EV charger sharing — think AirBnB but just for someone’s charger— on evmatch.com, there are a handful of them in DC but this will probably grow. TBH I’d thought about listing mine but never did, so maybe I’ll have to do that after all. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Tesla J1772 Wall Connector in shop
    I think this kind of thing is only currently available via evmatch.com and wallbox or juicebox chargers. Source: over 2 years ago

Pixi.js mentions (5)

  • Release Radar • March 2024 Edition
    If you're into video game dev, then PixiJS is something you need to know about. It's a HTML5 game engine that provides a lightweight 2D library across all devices. This latest update has a new package structure, custom builds, graphics API overhaul, and lots more. You can read about all these changes in the PixiJS Migration Guide. Also big congrats to PixiJS for being part of the open source community for ten... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Advice about useful libraries to create a 2D car game (hill climb racing style)
    I would need a renderer to display the graphics of my calculations on the "backend". After some research I think pixijs which is written in TS could be a great tool. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Is programming just not for me?
    And if that seems to up your alley you could look into Javascript game/renderer frameworks. They have 2D engines like https://github.com/photonstorm/phaser or https://github.com/pixijs/pixijs . Or my personal choice A-Frame which is a 3D, AR and VR engine (XR) https://github.com/aframevr/ . Source: over 2 years ago
  • Pixie – A full-featured 2D graphics library for Nim
    This has a high risk of being confused with pixi.js: https://github.com/pixijs/pixijs. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • Custome game engine: what stack ?
    WebGL, I hear, has a similar API to OpenGL. (Also, WebGPU is coming at some point.) Or, you could use a thin library that handles the WebGL drawing of sprites for you. I prefer that option over using a full game engine: I find it's better to only include dependencies when they become necessary. I recently tried a web rendering library called PixiJS, and it seemed like a pretty clean and nice-sized API, and... Source: almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing EVmatch and Pixi.js, you can also consider the following products

ChargeHub - Find charging stations for your electric vehicle

p5.js - JS library for creating graphic and interactive experiences

Chargeprice - Check the best charging tariffs for your EV

Anime.js - Lightweight JavaScript animation library

AllyVolt - Democratizing EV charging stations

D3.js - D3.js is a JavaScript library for manipulating documents based on data. D3 helps you bring data to life using HTML, SVG, and CSS.

Loading...