Software Alternatives & Reviews

Errbit VS Protobuf

Compare Errbit VS Protobuf and see what are their differences

Errbit logo Errbit

The open source error catcher that's Airbrake API compliant

Protobuf logo Protobuf

Protocol buffers are a language-neutral, platform-neutral extensible mechanism for serializing structured data.
  • Errbit Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-16
  • Protobuf Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-29

Errbit videos

No Errbit videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Protobuf videos

StreamBerry, part 2 : introduction to Google ProtoBuf

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Errbit and Protobuf)
Error Tracking
100 100%
0% 0
Configuration Management
0 0%
100% 100
Exception Monitoring
100 100%
0% 0
Mobile Apps
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Errbit and Protobuf. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Protobuf seems to be a lot more popular than Errbit. While we know about 82 links to Protobuf, we've tracked only 1 mention of Errbit. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Errbit mentions (1)

  • local error monitoring ?
    Are you looking for a self-hosted solution? There's Errbit (https://errbit.com/), an open source Airbrake-compatible system. Source: over 2 years ago

Protobuf mentions (82)

  • Developing games on and for Mac and Linux
    Protocol Buffers: https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Adding Codable conformance to Union with Metaprogramming
    ProtocolBuffers’ OneOf message addresses the case of having a message with many fields where at most one field will be set at the same time. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Logcat is awful. What would you improve?
    That's definitely the bigger thing. I think something like Protocol Buffers (Protobuf) is what you're looking for there. Output the data and consume it by something that can handle the analysis. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Bitcoin is the "narrow waist" of internet-based value
    These protocols prevent an O(N x M) explosion of code that have to solve for many cases. For example, since JSON is an almost ubiquitous format for wire transfer (although other things do exist like protobufs), if I had N data formats that I want to serialize, I only need to write N serializers/deserializers (SerDes). If there was no such narrow waist and there were M alternatives to JSON in wide usage, I would... Source: over 1 year ago
  • Understanding gRPC Concepts, Use Cases & Best Practices
    gRPC uses protocol buffers (it is an open source message format) as the default method of communication between client and server. Also, gRPC uses HTTP/ 2 as the default protocol. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Errbit and Protobuf, you can also consider the following products

Sentry.io - From error tracking to performance monitoring, developers can see what actually matters, solve quicker, and learn continuously about their applications - from the frontend to the backend.

gRPC - Application and Data, Languages & Frameworks, Remote Procedure Call (RPC), and Service Discovery

Rollbar - Rollbar collects errors that happen in your application, notifies you, and analyzes them so you can debug and fix them. Ruby, Python, PHP, Node.js, JavaScript, and Flash libraries available.

Messagepack - An efficient binary serialization format.

TrackJS - JavaScript Error Tracking for Modern Web Applications

YAML - YAML 1.2 --- YAML: YAML Ain't Markup Language