Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Erlang VS Pike programming language

Compare Erlang VS Pike programming language and see what are their differences

Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Erlang logo Erlang

A programming language used to build massively scalable soft real-time systems with requirements on high availability

Pike programming language logo Pike programming language

Dynamic programming language with a syntax similar to Java and C
  • Erlang Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-09

We recommend LibHunt Erlang for discovery and comparisons of trending Erlang projects.

  • Pike programming language Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-15

Erlang features and specs

  • Concurrency
    Erlang is designed for massive concurrency and supports thousands of lightweight processes, making it ideal for applications requiring multiple parallel operations.
  • Fault Tolerance
    Erlang provides robust support for fault tolerance, with built-in mechanisms for process monitoring and error recovery, leading to high system availability.
  • Distributed Computing
    Erlang's architecture facilitates distributed computing with easy support for building scalable, distributed systems across multiple nodes.
  • Hot Code Swapping
    Erlang supports hot code swapping, enabling developers to update code on a live system without requiring a system restart, which is crucial for continuous operation.
  • Functional Programming
    Erlang’s functional programming paradigm leads to simpler code with fewer side effects, improving maintainability.
  • Strong Community
    Erlang has a strong community, with a wealth of resources, libraries, and frameworks that support developers in building efficient systems.

Possible disadvantages of Erlang

  • Learning Curve
    Erlang has a steep learning curve, especially for developers who are not familiar with functional programming or its concurrency model.
  • Syntax
    The syntax of Erlang can be unfamiliar and challenging to new users, which may hinder the initial coding experience.
  • Limited Libraries
    Despite having a strong community, Erlang has fewer libraries and tools compared to more popular languages, which may limit development options for certain applications.
  • Performance Limitations
    While Erlang excels in concurrency, its performance for compute-intensive tasks might not match that of languages specifically optimized for such operations.
  • Niche Use Cases
    Erlang's strengths in certain niches like telecoms and real-time systems might not translate well to more general or varied software development tasks, limiting its adoption.

Pike programming language features and specs

  • Cross-platform Compatibility
    Pike can run on various platforms, including UNIX-like systems, Windows, and macOS, which makes it versatile for developers working in different environments.
  • Built-in Support for Object-Oriented Programming
    Pike supports object-oriented programming (OOP) paradigms, which allows developers to create reusable and modular code structures.
  • Efficient String and Data Handling
    Pike provides robust tools for handling strings and other data types, which simplifies text processing and parsing tasks.
  • Garbage Collection
    Automated memory management via garbage collection helps in reducing memory leaks, aiding developers in focusing more on application logic than memory management.
  • Rich Standard Library
    Pike offers a comprehensive standard library with modules for network programming, cryptography, multimedia handling, and more, aiding rapid development.

Possible disadvantages of Pike programming language

  • Relatively Niche Community
    Pike has a smaller user community compared to more popular languages, which can result in less community support, fewer tutorials, and limited third-party libraries.
  • Less Corporate Backing
    Unlike languages backed by large corporations, Pike may lack extensive development resources and long-term support guarantees.
  • Learning Curve
    For developers coming from more mainstream languages, Pike's syntax and concepts may take some time to get used to, prolonging the initial learning process.
  • Limited Integration with New Technologies
    The slower pace of updates and limited resources might make Pike fall behind in integrating the latest technological advancements and trends.
  • Scalability Challenges
    While suitable for small to medium-sized projects, Pike might pose challenges when used for very large systems requiring advanced concurrency management.

Erlang videos

+ Add

Book Review - Erlang in Anger

More videos:

  • Review - Erlang is getting pretty! - Michal Muskala | Code BEAM SF 20

Pike programming language videos

No Pike programming language videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Erlang and Pike programming language)

Erlang

Pike programming language

Programming Language
51 51%
Programming Language
49% 49
OOP
50 50%
OOP
50% 50
Generic Programming Language
52 52%
Generic Programming Language
48% 48
Development
45 45%
Development
55% 55

User comments

Share your experience with using Erlang and Pike programming language. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Pike programming language should be more popular than Erlang. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Erlang mentions (2)

  • Perfect Elixir: Environment Setup
    I’m on MacOS and erlang.org, elixir-lang.org, and postgresql.org all suggest installation via Homebrew, which is a very popular package manager for MacOS. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • What is Calypso?
    However, as Elixir is inherently tied to the BEAM and Erlang/OTP, it means that it has features like immutable variables (though you can rebind them and have state via process loops, e.g. Agents or GenServers). This also means that OTP is the main "application framework" for Elixir/Erlang. In my opinion, OTP is a pretty good design philosophy for applications, but sometimes it's just kind of hard to set up or wrap... - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago

Pike programming language mentions (4)

  • The C Interpreter: A Tutorial for Cin
    I'm sure I remember Pike starting off as a literal C interpreter, but somewhere along the line decided to become it's own 'C-like' language. https://pike.lysator.liu.se Wikipedia seems to imply that it was separated out from LPmud's built-in 'C interpreter' which sounds about right. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • MUD in Pike
    In any other case, I dunno. I just like it cos it's basically LPC being used outside a MUD. Check out the site though, and maybe play with it too. pike.lysator.liu.se. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Hacker News top posts: May 21, 2022
    Pike Programming Language\ (45 comments). Source: almost 3 years ago
  • What's the most obscure ACTUAL programming language?
    Pike (Apparently some Opera browser proxy compression server was written in it.). Source: about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Erlang and Pike programming language, you can also consider the following products

Go Programming Language - Go, also called golang, is a programming language initially developed at Google in 2007 by Robert...

D (Programming Language) - D is a language with C-like syntax and static typing.

Elixir - Dynamic, functional language designed for building scalable and maintainable applications

C++ - Has imperative, object-oriented and generic programming features, while also providing the facilities for low level memory manipulation

Perl - Highly capable, feature-rich programming language with over 26 years of development

IronPython - Development

Loading...