Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Enzyme VS CSS Grab n' Go Editor

Compare Enzyme VS CSS Grab n' Go Editor and see what are their differences

Flagsmith
Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Enzyme logo Enzyme

Enzyme is a JavaScript testing utility for React.

CSS Grab n' Go Editor logo CSS Grab n' Go Editor

Visual editor for learning and quick CSS mocking
  • Enzyme Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-16
  • CSS Grab n' Go Editor Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-25

Enzyme features and specs

  • Shallow Rendering
    Allows you to render a component without its children, which speeds up tests and isolates the component being tested.
  • Rich API
    Provides a comprehensive set of APIs that enable deep rendering, traversing, and manipulating of components, making it flexible and powerful for various testing needs.
  • Compatibility with Mocha and Jest
    Easily integrates with popular testing frameworks like Mocha and Jest, ensuring a smooth setup process.
  • Simulate Events
    Supports simulation of user events such as clicks, enabling more realistic interaction testing.
  • Selector Support
    Allows for selecting and finding elements using CSS selectors or component constructors, making it easier to target specific elements in tests.
  • Active Community
    Has a large and active community, which can be a valuable resource for support, plugins, and best practices.

Possible disadvantages of Enzyme

  • Complex Setup
    The initial setup and configuration can be complex, especially for beginners, requiring additional libraries and configurations.
  • Limited Support for New React Features
    Often lags behind in supporting new React features, such as Hooks or the latest Context API, compared to other testing frameworks.
  • Deprecation Warnings
    Issues with deprecation warnings and updates can arise, causing frustrations during maintenance and upgrades.
  • Performance Overhead
    Can be slower compared to other testing libraries, especially when using deep rendering for large components.
  • Inconsistent API
    Some users find the API inconsistent or unintuitive, requiring more effort to learn and use effectively.

CSS Grab n' Go Editor features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    The CSS Grab n' Go Editor provides a simple and intuitive interface that allows users, including those with minimal coding experience, to easily create and edit CSS styles.
  • Efficiency
    By providing a quick way to edit CSS, the tool enhances productivity for developers who need to implement or adjust styles rapidly without setting up a full development environment.
  • Accessibility
    Since it is web-based, the CSS Grab n' Go Editor can be accessed from any device with internet connectivity, providing flexibility for remote or on-the-go use.
  • Real-Time Preview
    Allows users to see the effects of their CSS changes immediately, which helps in verifying style adjustments instantly.

Possible disadvantages of CSS Grab n' Go Editor

  • Limited Advanced Features
    The tool might lack some advanced features that seasoned developers are accustomed to in full-fledged IDEs, which could be a limitation for complex projects.
  • Dependency on Internet Connection
    Being a web-based tool, it requires a stable internet connection to function effectively, which can be a con for users with unreliable internet access.
  • Potential Learning Curve
    While aimed at being user-friendly, new users might still face an initial learning curve in understanding the available features and best practices for CSS editing.
  • Security Concerns
    As with any web-based tool, there is always a concern about data privacy and security, particularly if sensitive project files are being edited or uploaded over the internet.

Analysis of Enzyme

Overall verdict

  • Enzyme is generally considered a good tool for testing React applications, especially among developers familiar with its API. However, it is worth noting that there has been a shift towards using React Testing Library, which has gained popularity for its focus on testing the application as users would interact with it.

Why this product is good

  • Enzyme is a popular JavaScript testing utility for React that makes it easier to assert, manipulate, and traverse your React Components' output. It provides methods for rendering components, interacting with them, and testing their lifecycle methods, which are essential for writing comprehensive tests for your React applications.

Recommended for

    Enzyme is recommended for developers who are working on React applications and prefer a testing library that provides a more detailed inspection of component internals, or for those maintaining legacy codebases that already rely on Enzyme. If you value testing that emphasizes implementation details, Enzyme can be a good choice.

Enzyme videos

+ Add

Enzymes (Updated)

More videos:

  • Review - Enzymes
  • Review - Over-the-Counter Enzyme Supplements Explained: Mayo Clinic Physician Explains Pros, Cons

CSS Grab n' Go Editor videos

No CSS Grab n' Go Editor videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Enzyme and CSS Grab n' Go Editor)

Enzyme

CSS Grab n' Go Editor

Developer Tools
60 60%
Developer Tools
40% 40
Design Tools
48 48%
Design Tools
52% 52
Front End Package Manager
100 100%
Front End Package Manager
0% 0
Web App
0 0%
Web App
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Enzyme and CSS Grab n' Go Editor. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Enzyme seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Enzyme mentions (3)

  • Top React Testing Libraries in 2025
    Enzyme is a widely-used testing utility that provides robust tools for interacting with and inspecting React components. Its API supports shallow, full, and static rendering, enabling developers to test components in isolation or with their child components. Enzyme also allows testing lifecycle methods, making it ideal for applications with complex state and props interactions. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • How we have managed to run Enzyme tests with React 18 app.
    Like many other companies with mature software, we found ourselves at a crossroads with our React application. The app, initially developed in early 2019, was built with React 16 and used Enzyme for unit testing. Over the past five years, the app grew, evolved, gained new features, and went though minor and major refactorings. Obviously, as responsible engineers we always maintained unit test coverage around... - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • What would you consider to be a must for a modern 2022 dev stack?
    React testing library instead of enzyme for testing react UIs. I'll never go back. Source: about 3 years ago

CSS Grab n' Go Editor mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CSS Grab n' Go Editor yet. Tracking of CSS Grab n' Go Editor recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Enzyme and CSS Grab n' Go Editor, you can also consider the following products

Ava - Making conversations accessible for the deaf

EazyCSS - No code CSS editor for any website.

EyeJS - A JavaScript testing framework for the real world.

Hoverify - All-in-one browser extension to improve your web dev experience.

react-testing-library - [`React Testing Library`][gh] builds on top of `DOM Testing Library` by adding

NextUX Visual Editor - Easy-to-use iteration app for non-designers

Loading...