Envoyer VS ASP.NET

Envoyer Reviews

ASP.NET Reviews

Envoyer mentions (7)

• An automatic deployment system for PM2 self-hosting. Uses only an api endpoint and bash script

  Follows the deployment methods used by envoyer.io. Source: 10 months ago

• Automatically Deploy Laravel Applications with Amezmo - Modern deployment Tool for PHP

  Amezmo is a managed Laravel hosting platform without the pain of managing a VPS, they provide automated deployments, automatic SSL, Remote MySQL, and so much more. Using Amezmo you get the power of a VPS but without the complexity and time commitment required to maintain the server for hosting your PHP apps, helping you focus on what's important. For zero-downtime PHP deployments, You'll typically use a tool like... - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago

• My whole live site is down! First Spatie Library then a whole host of other issues after composer install

  Thank you for the envoyer.io recommendation - I use Laravel Forge - do you know if they have something similar. Regarding symlinks I'm not sure if you're referring to a folder somewhere on my local system - which of course will not be practical when pushing live or to remote - however one way I have been attempting to do this is to fork vendor folders and then pull using composer for the latest commit.. I'm just... Source: over 1 year ago

• How I added zero down deployment to my website

  Laravel offers a first-party paid product to avoid this, Envoyer it's only $10 bucks a month. But laravelremote.com doesn't generate any revenue right now, and I'm the type of person that likes to do things in-house to learn how it works, and I also like the freedom that it provides. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago

• I am lost on how to "correctly" deploy my app to the production server

  Envoy is also great, but won't solve your zero downtime or rollback requirments on its own. There is Laravel Envoyer (similar name, different product) which will fulfill those requirements, but it has a (small) cost attached. Source: over 2 years ago

ASP.NET mentions (19)

• What’s New in Bold Reports 6.1 April 2024 Release

  The Bold Reporting Tools ASP.NET MVC and ASP.NET Web Forms will no longer be deployed in the embedded build. However, bug fixes are diligently transferred to our public repositories until Microsoft officially announces the end of support for these platforms. For new web application development or to stay up-to-date, Blazor or ASP.NET Core are recommended. - Source: dev.to / 5 days ago

• Is ASP.NET Core the next step in my career being an ASP.NET MVC developer? Or are there other technologies I should look at?

  Sorry for the possibly dumb questions. But then does .NET 5 have a "Model View Controller" workflow? I'm seeing ASP.NET still exists. But it's just "ASP.NET", no "MVC" or "Core" attached to the end. And they seem to recommend Blazor instead of C# which is something I only know the name of. Source: about 1 year ago

• Mixing GCloud and F#

  Cloud functions run aspnet core under the hood, but since it is a controlled environment it was designed in a way that the only concern you should worry about is running your function so all of the usual boilerplate related to adding services, middleware or enabling features is hidden away from you which for most simple scenarios this is what you will need and in the case of F# where dependency injection is more... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• Professional transition from Java to C#?

  I'm doing "backend data processing microservices" and the main framework component is ASP. Source: over 1 year ago

• Mudblazor for Blazor

  .NET has had various templating frameworks since its inception in the early 2000's. From the likes of Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF), Windows Forms(WF), ASP.NET Core MVC, Razor Pages to Blazor and now .NET MAUI. Microsoft offers a way to choose an ASP.NET Core web UI for developers to find the right user interface(UI) to use for their solution. The focus however is on Blazor and in particular for webAssembly. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago