Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Enhanced GitHub VS Commit Together by Github

Compare Enhanced GitHub VS Commit Together by Github and see what are their differences

Enhanced GitHub logo Enhanced GitHub

:rocket: Chrome extension to display size of each file, download link and copy file contents directly to clipboard - softvar/enhanced-github

Commit Together by Github logo Commit Together by Github

Now add co-authors to your commits
  • Enhanced GitHub Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-06
  • Commit Together by Github Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-04

Enhanced GitHub features and specs

  • File Download
    Enhanced GitHub provides a direct download button for each file in a repository, which simplifies the process of obtaining files without needing to clone the entire repository.
  • Repo Size
    It displays the total size of the repository, which is not available in the default GitHub interface, helping users make informed decisions about cloning or downloading repositories.
  • Link to Release Downloads
    The tool provides quick access links to release downloads directly from the repository page, saving users time navigating through release sections.
  • Clone Speed Enhancement
    It offers estimated clone speeds based on your connection, improving user understanding of how long a repository might take to clone.

Possible disadvantages of Enhanced GitHub

  • Browser Compatibility
    Enhanced GitHub might not be compatible with all browsers as it primarily functions as a browser extension, limiting its accessibility.
  • Security Concerns
    As a third-party tool, there could be concerns regarding data security and privacy, since it requires permissions to access GitHub content.
  • Maintenance
    The project might not be regularly maintained or updated for new GitHub features or changes, which could lead to issues or reduced functionality.
  • Limited Scope
    While enhancing certain aspects of GitHub, the tool does not cover all potential improvements, limiting its usefulness to its specific features.

Commit Together by Github features and specs

  • Enhanced Collaboration
    Commit Together allows multiple authors to be credited in a single commit, which fosters a more collaborative environment and ensures everyone involved receives recognition for their contributions.
  • Improved Code Review Process
    With multiple authors clearly listed, reviewers can better understand who contributed to which parts of the code, facilitating more directed questions and discussions.
  • Accountability
    By attributing every change to the respective author, teams can easily track who made specific changes, which helps in accountability and understanding the history of a project.
  • Efficiency in Pair Programming
    When pair programming, both developers can be credited for their combined effort, streamlining the process of sharing code ownership during collaborative sessions.

Possible disadvantages of Commit Together by Github

  • Complex Commit History
    Having multiple authors for a single commit may lead to a more complex commit history, making it harder to pinpoint individual contributions over time.
  • Potential Workflow Conflicts
    Teams that are used to single-author commits may experience workflow conflicts or require adjustments in practices to accommodate multi-author contributions.
  • Initial Setup Overhead
    Learners and new users might face a learning curve or require additional setup to understand and correctly implement the multi-author commit feature.
  • Tooling Compatibility
    Some third-party tools and extensions might not fully support or display multi-author commits, leading to inconsistencies in those environments.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Enhanced GitHub and Commit Together by Github)
Software Development
100 100%
0% 0
Productivity
0 0%
100% 100
Developer Tools
28 28%
72% 72
Git
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Enhanced GitHub and Commit Together by Github. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Commit Together by Github seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Enhanced GitHub mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Enhanced GitHub yet. Tracking of Enhanced GitHub recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Commit Together by Github mentions (1)

  • Ask HN: Do you rewrite pull requests?
    There is "Co-authored-by" which is supported on GitHub [1] and seems appropriate if the maintainer is basing the solution on someone's code. [1] https://github.blog/2018-01-29-commit-together-with-co-authors/. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Enhanced GitHub and Commit Together by Github, you can also consider the following products

Refined GitHub - Browser extension that makes GitHub cleaner & more powerful

Commit Print - Posters of your git history

GitZip - Download or create a download link for a GitHub project folder/sub-folder or file.

CommitTasks - A small CLI tool that combines git commit and todo list 🛠📝

GitHub Hovercard - GitHub Hovercard provides neat hovercards for GitHub.

Board for Github - A webview based GitHub project app with native features