Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

empty VS Check

Compare empty VS Check and see what are their differences

monday.com
The most intuitive platform to manage projects and teamwork featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

empty logo empty

empty is an utility that provides an interface to execute and/or interact with processes under...

Check logo Check

Check is a unit testing framework for C, which runs on environments such as GNU/Linux, GNU/Hurd, BSD, and Mac OSX. 
  • empty Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-20
  • Check Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-05

empty features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Check features and specs

  • Open Source
    Check is an open-source tool, meaning it is freely available for users to download, use, and modify. This allows developers to tailor the tool to their specific needs and contribute to its development.
  • C Library Unit Testing
    Check is specifically designed for unit testing in C, providing a framework that integrates well with the C language, making it easier for developers to conduct tests.
  • Automatic Test Discovery
    Check automatically discovers and executes tests within a test suite, simplifying the testing process and reducing the amount of manual configuration required.
  • Flexible Output Formats
    Check supports multiple output formats, including XML, which can be useful for integrating with continuous integration systems and for detailed reporting.
  • Active Community
    Being hosted on a platform like SourceForge provides Check with a community of users who can offer support, share insights, and contribute to ongoing development.

Possible disadvantages of Check

  • Limited Language Support
    Check is specifically designed for the C language, which means it may not be suitable for projects that involve multiple programming languages.
  • Complexity for New Users
    For developers who are new to unit testing or unfamiliar with C, setting up and using Check might have a learning curve, potentially making it harder to adopt immediately.
  • Less Feature-Rich Compared to Modern Alternatives
    Compared to more modern and feature-rich testing frameworks like Google Test or Catch2, Check may lag in some advanced features or ease of integration with other tools.
  • Fewer Tutorials and Documentation
    While there is documentation available, it might not be as comprehensive or as up-to-date as some other testing frameworks, which could be a hindrance for new users looking for extensive learning resources.

empty videos

+ Add

The Empty Man Deserves a Cult Following

More videos:

  • Review - Empty Shell Review
  • Review - Chris Stuckmann's Empty Review of 2023 | EFAP Highlight

Check videos

No Check videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to empty and Check)

empty

Check

Project Management
49 49%
Project Management
51% 51
Task Management
49 49%
Task Management
51% 51
CMS
100 100%
CMS
0% 0
Productivity
34 34%
Productivity
66% 66

User comments

Share your experience with using empty and Check. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing empty and Check, you can also consider the following products

Expect - Expect is a tool for automating interactive applications such as telnet, ftp, passwd, fsck, rlogin...

Gone - An ephemeral to-do list

Toxiproxy - Toxiproxy is a framework for simulating network conditions to prove with tests that the application doesn't have single points of failure.

Simpli - Keep track of email, calendars, notes and more in a unified interface.

DejaGnu - DejaGnu is a framework for testing other programs.

Priorities - A todo app for today and tomorrow only

Loading...