Emoji CSS VS Unused CSS finder

Add Emoji's to your website

Crawl your website and find unused CSS

Ease of Use
Implementing Emoji CSS is straightforward. You only need to include the CSS file in your project and use simple class names to display emojis, making it easy for developers of all levels to incorporate.
Cross-browser Compatibility
Emoji CSS is designed to work across different browsers, ensuring that your emojis will display consistently regardless of the user's browsing environment.
Vector Graphics
The emojis are served as vector graphics, which ensures they are scalable and retain quality at different sizes, unlike raster images which can become pixelated.
Customization
Emoji CSS allows for CSS-based customizations, meaning you can easily style or animate the emojis using standard CSS.

Limited Emojis
The library may not include every available emoji, which can be limiting if you need specific icons that aren't provided.
Load Time
Including an external CSS file can add to the load time of your webpage, which might be a concern for performance-critical applications.
Dependency
Relying on an external library means your project is dependent on its availability and updates. If the service goes down or is discontinued, you would need to find an alternative.
No Native Support
Since Emoji CSS uses custom icons, it doesn't benefit from the native support provided by operating systems and browsers for standard emojis, which can potentially lead to inconsistencies.

Efficiency
Identifies unused CSS, resulting in cleaner and more efficient code. This can lead to improved page load times and reduced bandwidth usage.
Ease of Use
Provides a straightforward interface that allows users to quickly scan their websites and find unnecessary CSS without needing extensive technical knowledge.
Cost Savings
By eliminating unused CSS, it reduces the amount of data that needs to be transmitted and stored, potentially saving on hosting and bandwidth costs.
Improved Maintenance
With a reduction in CSS file size, future maintenance becomes easier and more manageable, making it simpler to update or refactor code.

False Positives
May incorrectly identify CSS as unused if the tool does not recognize dynamic changes or conditional loading, which can lead to accidental removal of necessary styles.
Dependency on External Tool
Relying on an external tool could present privacy and security concerns, especially when sharing potentially sensitive code and styling information.
Manual Verification
Requires manual verification of results to ensure important styles are not removed, which can be time-consuming and somewhat negate the tool's time savings.
Incompatibility with Complex Frameworks
Might not effectively handle complex CSS frameworks or preprocessors, where styles are used indirectly or dynamically through Javascript or server-side frameworks.